A comparison of approximation techniques for variance-based sensitivity analysis of biochemical reaction systems

被引:10
|
作者
Zhang, Hong-Xuan [1 ]
Goutsias, John [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Whitaker Biomed Engn Inst, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
来源
BMC BIOINFORMATICS | 2010年 / 11卷
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
POLYNOMIAL CHAOS EXPANSION; REPRESENTATION RS-HDMR; CIRCADIAN CLOCK; MODEL; NETWORK; REDUCTION; TRANSIENT; DURATION; DESIGN; MAPK;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2105-11-246
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Background: Sensitivity analysis is an indispensable tool for the analysis of complex systems. In a recent paper, we have introduced a thermodynamically consistent variance-based sensitivity analysis approach for studying the robustness and fragility properties of biochemical reaction systems under uncertainty in the standard chemical potentials of the activated complexes of the reactions and the standard chemical potentials of the molecular species. In that approach, key sensitivity indices were estimated by Monte Carlo sampling, which is computationally very demanding and impractical for large biochemical reaction systems. Computationally efficient algorithms are needed to make variance-based sensitivity analysis applicable to realistic cellular networks, modeled by biochemical reaction systems that consist of a large number of reactions and molecular species. Results: We present four techniques, derivative approximation (DA), polynomial approximation (PA), Gauss-Hermite integration (GHI), and orthonormal Hermite approximation (OHA), for analytically approximating the variance-based sensitivity indices associated with a biochemical reaction system. By using a well-known model of the mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling cascade as a case study, we numerically compare the approximation quality of these techniques against traditional Monte Carlo sampling. Our results indicate that, although DA is computationally the most attractive technique, special care should be exercised when using it for sensitivity analysis, since it may only be accurate at low levels of uncertainty. On the other hand, PA, GHI, and OHA are computationally more demanding than DA but can work well at high levels of uncertainty. GHI results in a slightly better accuracy than PA, but it is more difficult to implement. OHA produces the most accurate approximation results and can be implemented in a straightforward manner. It turns out that the computational cost of the four approximation techniques considered in this paper is orders of magnitude smaller than traditional Monte Carlo estimation. Software, coded in MATLAB r, which implements all sensitivity analysis techniques discussed in this paper, is available free of charge. Conclusions: Estimating variance-based sensitivity indices of a large biochemical reaction system is a computationally challenging task that can only be addressed via approximations. Among the methods presented in this paper, a technique based on orthonormal Hermite polynomials seems to be an acceptable candidate for the job, producing very good approximation results for a wide range of uncertainty levels in a fraction of the time required by traditional Monte Carlo sampling.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comparison of approximation techniques for variance-based sensitivity analysis of biochemical reaction systems
    Hong-Xuan Zhang
    John Goutsias
    [J]. BMC Bioinformatics, 11
  • [2] Reducing experimental variability in variance-based sensitivity analysis of biochemical reaction systems
    Zhang, Hong-Xuan
    Goutsias, John
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 134 (11):
  • [3] An effective approximation for variance-based global sensitivity analysis
    Zhang, Xufang
    Pandey, Mahesh D.
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2014, 121 : 164 - 174
  • [4] Variance-Based Global Sensitivity Analysis for Power Systems
    Ni, Fei
    Nijhuis, Michiel
    Nguyen, Phuong H.
    Cobben, Joseph F. G.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2018, 33 (02) : 1670 - 1682
  • [5] VARIANCE-BASED SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS ON PSHA
    Wu, Min-Hao
    Wang, Jui-Pin
    Sung, Chia-Ying
    [J]. Journal of GeoEngineering, 2024, 19 (03): : 112 - 120
  • [6] Variance-based global sensitivity analysis for fuzzy random structural systems
    Javidan, Mohammad Mahdi
    Kim, Jinkoo
    [J]. COMPUTER-AIDED CIVIL AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2019, 34 (07) : 602 - 615
  • [7] Efficient method for variance-based sensitivity analysis
    Chen, Xin
    Molina-Cristobal, Arturo
    Guenov, Marin D.
    Riaz, Atif
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2019, 181 : 97 - 115
  • [8] Parameter uncertainty effects on variance-based sensitivity analysis
    Yu, W.
    Harris, T. J.
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2009, 94 (02) : 596 - 603
  • [9] An efficient sampling method for variance-based sensitivity analysis
    Yun, Wanying
    Lu, Zhenzhou
    Zhang, Kaichao
    Jiang, Xian
    [J]. STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2017, 65 : 74 - 83
  • [10] Operating rules for hydro-photovoltaic systems: A variance-based sensitivity analysis
    Yang, Zhikai
    Liu, Pan
    Xia, Qian
    Li, He
    Cheng, Qian
    Cheng, Lei
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2024, 372