Using a family systems approach to investigate cancer risk communication within melanoma families

被引:28
|
作者
Harris, Julie N. [1 ]
Hay, Jennifer [2 ]
Kuniyuki, Alan [3 ]
Asgari, Maryam M. [4 ,5 ]
Press, Nancy [6 ,7 ]
Bowen, Deborah J. [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Robert Wood Johnson Hlth & Soc Scholars Program, San Francisco, CA 94118 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, New York, NY 10021 USA
[3] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, Program Canc Prevent, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
[4] Kaiser Permanente No Calif, Div Res, Oakland, CA USA
[5] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Dermatol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[6] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Sch Nursing, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[7] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Sch Med, Dept Publ Hlth & Prevent Med, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[8] Boston Univ, Dept Social & Behav Sci, Boston, MA 02215 USA
关键词
family; cancer; risk communication; melanoma; family functioning; CIRCUMPLEX MODEL; BREAST-CANCER; INFORMATION; KNOWLEDGE; DISTRESS; HISTORY; DISEASE; IMPACT; BRCA1; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1002/pon.1667
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: The family provides an important communication nexus for information and support exchange about family cancer history, and adoption of family-wide cancer risk reduction strategies. The goals of this study were to (1) use the family systems theory to identify characteristics of this sample of families at increased risk of developing melanoma and (2) to relate familial characteristics to the frequency and style of familial risk communication. Methods: Participants were first-degree relatives (n = 313) of melanoma patients, recruited into a family web-based intervention study. We used multivariable logistic regression models to analyze the association between family functioning and family communication. Results: Most participants were female (60%), with an average age of 51 years. Fifty percent of participants reported that they spoke to their relatives about melanoma risk and people were more likely to speak to their female family members. Familial adaptation, cohesion, coping, and health beliefs were strongly associated with an open style of risk communication within families. None were associated with a blocked style of risk communication. Only cohesion and adaptation were associated with the amount of risk communication that occurred within families. Conclusions: Overall, individuals who came from families that were more highly cohesive, adaptable, and shared strong beliefs about melanoma risk were more likely to communicate openly about melanoma. The fact that this association was not consistent across blocked communication and communication frequency highlights the multifaceted nature of this process. Future research should focus on the interplay between different facets of communication. Copyright (C) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1102 / 1111
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A RISK COMMUNICATION AND PREVENTION INTERVENTION FOR CHILDREN AT RISK FOR MELANOMA AND THEIR FAMILIES
    Wu, Yelena P.
    Nagelhout, Elizabeth
    Aspinwall, Lisa
    Boucher, Kenneth
    Parsons, Bridget
    Kohlmann, Wendy
    Kaphingst, Kimberly
    Homburger, Sheila
    Perkins, Ryan
    Grossman, Douglas
    Harding, Garrett
    Leachman, Sancy
    [J]. ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2018, 52 : S176 - S176
  • [2] Characteristics of Health Information Gatherers, Disseminators, and Blockers Within Families at Risk of Hereditary Cancer: Implications for Family Health Communication Interventions
    Koehly, Laura M.
    Peters, June A.
    Kenen, Regina
    Hoskins, Lindsey M.
    Ersig, Anne L.
    Kuhn, Natalia R.
    Loud, Jennifer T.
    Greene, Mark H.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2009, 99 (12) : 2203 - 2209
  • [3] All in the family? Communication of cancer survivors with their families
    Bowen, Deborah J.
    Hay, Jennifer L.
    Harris-Wai, Julie N.
    Meischke, Hendrika
    Burke, Wylie
    [J]. FAMILIAL CANCER, 2017, 16 (04) : 597 - 603
  • [4] All in the family? Communication of cancer survivors with their families
    Deborah J. Bowen
    Jennifer L. Hay
    Julie N. Harris-Wai
    Hendrika Meischke
    Wylie Burke
    [J]. Familial Cancer, 2017, 16 : 597 - 603
  • [5] Think Family A new approach to Families at Risk
    Eisenstadt, Naomi
    [J]. FAMILY MATTERS, 2011, (87) : 37 - 42
  • [6] Family Communication in Lynch Syndrome Families: Experiences With the Family-Linked Approach
    Leenen, Celine H.
    den Heijer, Mariska
    van der Meer, Conny
    Kuipers, Ernst J.
    van Leerdam, Monique
    Wagner, Anja
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2011, 140 (05) : S259 - S259
  • [7] Melanoma high-risk families' perceived health care provider risk communication
    Lois J. Loescher
    Janice D. Crist
    Lee Cranmer
    Clara Curiel-Lewandrowski
    James A Warneke
    [J]. Journal of Cancer Education, 2009, 24 : 301 - 307
  • [8] Melanoma High-Risk Families' Perceived Health Care Provider Risk Communication
    Loescher, Lois J.
    Crist, Janice D.
    Cranmer, Lee
    Curiel-Lewandrowski, Clara
    Warneke, James A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION, 2009, 24 (04) : 301 - 307
  • [9] Family Communication of Genetic Risk: A Personalized Approach
    Mary B. Daly
    [J]. Current Genetic Medicine Reports, 2016, 4 (2) : 35 - 40
  • [10] Facilitating well-being in cancer impacted families: Written emotional expression within a family approach
    Rosenbaum, DI
    Lisman, SA
    [J]. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2004, 13 (01) : S58 - S58