An empirical survey on biobanking of human genetic material and data in six EU countries

被引:72
|
作者
Hirtzlin, I
Dubreuil, C
Préaubert, N
Duchier, J
Jansen, B
Simon, J
de Faria, PL
Perez-Lezaun, A
Visser, B
Williams, GD
Cambon-Thomsen, A
机构
[1] Univ Paris 01, F-75231 Paris 05, France
[2] Fac Med Toulouse, INSERM, U558, F-31073 Toulouse, France
[3] Europae Akad Umwelt & Wirtschaft, Luneburg, Germany
[4] Univ Nova Lisboa, Escola Nacl Saude Publ, Lisbon, Portugal
[5] Univ Pompeu Fabra, Unitat Biol Evolut, Dept Ciencies Expt & Salut, Barcelona, Spain
[6] Ctr Genet Resources, Wageningen, Netherlands
[7] Univ Cent Lancashire, Ctr Profess Eth, Preston PR1 2HE, Lancs, England
[8] ANAES, Paris, France
关键词
human biobanking; genetic collection management; Europe; empirical survey; ethics; economics;
D O I
10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201007
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Biobanks correspond to different situations: research and technological development, medical diagnosis or therapeutic activities. Their status is not clearly defined. We aimed to investigate human biobanking in Europe, particularly in relation to organisational, economic and ethical issues in various national contexts. Data from a survey in six EU countries ( France, Germany, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain and the UK) were collected as part of a European Research Project examining human and non-human biobanking (EUROGENBANK, coordinated by Professor JC Galloux). A total of 147 institutions concerned with biobanking of human samples and data were investigated by questionnaires and interviews. Most institutions surveyed belong to the public or private non-profit-making sectors, which have a key role in biobanking. This activity is increasing in all countries because few samples are discarded and genetic research is proliferating. Collections vary in size, many being small and only a few very large. Their purpose is often research, or research and healthcare, mostly in the context of disease studies. A specific budget is very rarely allocated to biobanking and costs are not often evaluated. Samples are usually provided free of charge and gifts and exchanges are the common rule. Good practice guidelines are generally followed and quality controls are performed but quality procedures are not always clearly explained. Associated data are usually computerised ( identified or identifiable samples). Biobankers generally favour centralisation of data rather than of samples. Legal and ethical harmonisation within Europe is considered likely to facilitate international collaboration. We propose a series of recommendations and suggestions arising from the EUROGENBANK project.
引用
收藏
页码:475 / 488
页数:14
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] An empirical survey on biobanking of human genetic material and data in six EU countries
    Isabelle Hirtzlin
    Christine Dubreuil
    Nathalie Préaubert
    Jenny Duchier
    Brigitte Jansen
    Jürgen Simon
    Paula Lobato de Faria
    Anna Perez-Lezaun
    Bert Visser
    Garrath D Williams
    Anne Cambon-Thomsen
    European Journal of Human Genetics, 2003, 11 : 475 - 488
  • [2] An empiric survey on biobanking in human genetics in six EU countries
    Cambon-Thomsen, A
    Hirtzlin, I
    Dubreuil, C
    Préaubert, N
    Duchier, J
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2002, 10 : 194 - 195
  • [3] Biobanking between the EU and Third Countries - Can Data Sharing Be Facilitated via Soft Regulatory Tools?
    Slokenberga, Santa
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH LAW, 2018, 25 (05) : 517 - 536
  • [4] Support Systems for Poor Readers: Empirical Data From Six EU Member States
    Ise, Elena
    Blomert, Leo
    Bertrand, Daisy
    Faisca, Luis
    Puolakanaho, Anne
    Saine, Nina L.
    Suranyi, Zsuzsanna
    Vaessen, Anniek
    Csepe, Valeria
    Lyytinen, Heikki
    Reis, Alexandra
    Ziegler, Johannes C.
    Schulte-Koerne, Gerd
    JOURNAL OF LEARNING DISABILITIES, 2011, 44 (03) : 228 - 245
  • [5] Variation of smoking prevalence in six European countries, comparison of health survey data
    Bayingana, K.
    Tafforeau, T. F.
    Alfaro, L. M.
    Calmonte, R.
    Deverill, C.
    Kjoller, M.
    Lieberherr, R.
    Ramm, J.
    Rasmussen, N. K.
    Van Oyen, H.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2006, 21 : 83 - 84
  • [6] Response styles in rating scales - Evidence of method bias in data from six EU countries
    van Herk, H
    Poortinga, YH
    Verhallen, TMM
    JOURNAL OF CROSS-CULTURAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 35 (03) : 346 - 360
  • [7] Status, sale and patenting of human genetic material: an international survey
    Bartha Maria Knoppers
    Nature Genetics, 1999, 22 : 23 - 26
  • [8] Status, sale and patenting of human genetic material: an international survey
    Knoppers, BM
    NATURE GENETICS, 1999, 22 (01) : 23 - 26
  • [9] Measuring health literacy in Asia: Validation of the HLS-EU-Q47 survey tool in six Asian countries
    Duong, Tuyen V.
    Aringazina, Altyn
    Baisunova, Gaukhar
    Nurjanah
    Pham, Thuc V.
    Pham, Khue M.
    Truong, Tien Q.
    Nguyen, Kien T.
    Oo, Win Myint
    Mohamad, Emma
    Su, Tin Tin
    Huang, Hsiao-Ling
    Sorensen, Kristine
    Pelikan, Juergen M.
    Van den Broucke, Stephan
    Chang, Peter Wushou
    JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2017, 27 (02) : 80 - 86
  • [10] Teachers’ Conceptions About the Genetic Determinism of Human Behaviour: A Survey in 23 Countries
    Jérémy Castéra
    Pierre Clément
    Science & Education, 2014, 23 : 417 - 443