Variation of glucosinolates concentration and root growth of horseradish as affected by nitrogen and sulphur supply

被引:7
|
作者
Rivelli, A. R. [1 ]
Lelario, F. [2 ]
Agneta, R. [1 ]
Moellers, C. [3 ]
De Maria, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basilicata, Sch Agr Forest Food & Environm Sci, Via Ateneo Lucano 10, I-85100 Potenza, Italy
[2] Univ Basilicata, Dept Sci, Potenza, Italy
[3] Univ Gottingen, Dept Crop Sci, Gottingen, Germany
关键词
above and below-ground tissues; Armoracia rusticana; medicinal herb; natural preservative; secondary metabolites; ARMORACIA-RUSTICANA; PROFILE; TISSUES;
D O I
10.17221/750/2015-PSE
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The aim of the study was to evaluate total and individual glucosinolates concentration, root weight and diameters of horseradish accessions (Cor and Mon) grown by adding nitrogen (N) and sulphur (S) and harvested at the beginning (late autumn) and towards the end (early spring) of the harvest period. The concentration of the 9 glucosinolates (GLS) quantified in roots varied greatly between accessions (6-fold higher in Cor) and with fertilization (N alone led to an increase of 64% of GLS with an additional enhancement of 65% when S was added to N). Root GLS concentration was significantly higher in early spring compared to the previous harvest in late autumn (12.5 vs 8.9 mu mol/g DW (dry weight)); a drastic decline of GLS (2.7 mu mol/g DW) occurred in root harvested in the following autumn from plants left ad hoc in the field. The aliphatic sinigrin was the most abundant (80% of total GLS), followed by the aromatic gluconasturtiin and the indolic glucobrassicin (5.8% and 4.7%, respectively). Root diameter and weight increased in plants treated with fertilizers (19% and 61%, respectively) and throughout the harvests with Cor showing values double with respect to Mon (925 vs 476 g/plant). Relationships between GLS concentration and root weight (R-2 = 0.61) and diameter (R-2 = 0.69) were improved by excluding the roots harvested from plants left ad hoc in the field that showed the worst performances.
引用
收藏
页码:307 / 313
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] GROWTH AND SHOOT-ROOT PARTITIONING OF SPINACH PLANTS AS AFFECTED BY NITROGEN SUPPLY
    SMOLDERS, E
    MERCKX, R
    PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT, 1992, 15 (07): : 795 - 807
  • [2] Marandu grass root system as affected by the combinations of nitrogen and sulphur rates
    Batista, Karina
    Monteiro, Francisco Antonio
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE CIENCIA DO SOLO, 2006, 30 (05): : 821 - 828
  • [3] GROWTH AND NITROGEN ACCUMULATION IN TOBACCO PLANTS AS AFFECTED BY NITRATE CONCENTRATION, ROOT TEMPERATURE, AND AERIAL TEMPERATURE
    OSMOND, DL
    RAPER, CD
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1981, 73 (03) : 491 - 496
  • [4] MAIZE GROWTH AS AFFECTED BY ROOT TEMPERATURE AND FORM OF NITROGEN
    MORAGHAN, JT
    PORTER, OA
    PLANT AND SOIL, 1975, 43 (02) : 479 - 487
  • [5] Nitrogen and sulphur in Marandu grass: Relationship between supply and concentration in leaf tissues
    Batista, Karina
    Monteiro, Francisco Antonio
    SCIENTIA AGRICOLA, 2007, 64 (01): : 44 - 51
  • [6] Variation in Root and Shoot Growth in Response to Reduced Nitrogen
    Tolley, Seth
    Mohammadi, Mohsen
    PLANTS-BASEL, 2020, 9 (02):
  • [7] Growth,Nitrogen Uptake and Flow in Maize Plants Affected by Root Growth Restriction
    Liangzheng Xu1
    2School of Life Sciences
    3Centre of Agricultural Resources
    Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 2009, 51 (07) : 689 - 697
  • [8] Growth, Nitrogen Uptake and Flow in Maize Plants Affected by Root Growth Restriction
    Xu, Liangzheng
    Niu, Junfang
    Li, Chunjian
    Zhang, Fusuo
    JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE PLANT BIOLOGY, 2009, 51 (07) : 689 - 697
  • [9] Variation in the nitrogen concentration of the leaf, branch, trunk, and root in vegetation in China
    Zhao Hang
    He Nianpeng
    Xu Li
    Zhang Ximin
    Wang Qiufeng
    Wang Bin
    Yu Guirui
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2019, 96 : 496 - 504
  • [10] Growth and yield of taramira (Eruca sativa) as affected by nitrogen and sulphur under dryland conditions
    Rana, KS
    Rana, DS
    Kumar, P
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2001, 46 (01) : 168 - 170