Leaf ureide degradation and N2 fixation tolerance to water deficit in soybean

被引:57
|
作者
Vadez, V [1 ]
Sinclair, TR [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, USDA ARS, Dept Agron, Agron Physiol Lab, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
关键词
N-2; fixation; soybeans; soil water deficit; ureide degradation; tolerance;
D O I
10.1093/jexbot/52.354.153
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Accumulation of ureides in leaves is associated with the sensitivity of N-2 fixation in soybean to soil water deficit. Consequently, ureide degradation in leaves may be a key to increasing soybean tolerance to dry soils. Previous research indicated that allantoic acid degradation is catalysed by different enzymes in cultivars Maple Arrow and Williams, The enzyme found in Williams requires manganese as a cofactor. The first objective of this study was to determine if the two degradation pathways were associated with differences in N-2 sensitivity to soil water deficits. N-2 fixation of Williams grown on low-Mn soil was sensitive to stress, but it was relatively tolerant when grown on soil amended with Mn. N-2 fixation in Maple Arrow was relatively tolerant of soil drying regardless of the Mn treatment. The second objective of this study was to expand the study of the degradation pathway to nine additional genotypes, Based on ureide degradation in the presence and absence of Mn, these genotypes also segregated for the two degradation pathways. Those genotypes with the Mn-dependent pathway tended to have drought-sensitive N-2 fixation, but there was one exception, The genotypes not requiring Mn for ureide degradation were drought-tolerant except for one genotype, These results demonstrated the possibility for increasing N-2 fixation tolerance to soil water deficits in soybean by selection of lines with high ureide degradation rates, which were commonly associated with the Mn-independent pathway.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 159
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Alteration in leaf ureide metabolism by soil Mn availability to increase soybean N2 fixation tolerance to water deficit
    Vadez, V
    Sinclair, TR
    SOIL AND CROP SCIENCE SOCIETY OF FLORIDA PROCEEDINGS, 2001, 60 : 93 - 98
  • [2] Identification of soybean genotypes with N2 fixation tolerance to water deficits
    Sinclair, TR
    Purcell, LC
    Vadez, V
    Serraj, R
    King, CA
    Nelson, R
    CROP SCIENCE, 2000, 40 (06) : 1803 - 1809
  • [3] Comparison of inhibition of N2 fixation and ureide accumulation under water deficit in four common bean genotypes of contrasting drought tolerance
    Coleto, I.
    Pineda, M.
    Rodino, A. P.
    De Ron, A. M.
    Alamillo, J. M.
    ANNALS OF BOTANY, 2014, 113 (06) : 1071 - 1082
  • [4] Soybean N2 fixation estimates, ureide concentration, and yield responses to drought
    Purcell, LC
    Serraj, R
    Sinclair, TR
    De, A
    CROP SCIENCE, 2004, 44 (02) : 484 - 492
  • [5] Ureide accumulation in response to Mn nutrition by eight soybean genotypes with N2 fixation tolerance to soil drying
    Sinclair, TR
    Vadez, V
    Chenu, K
    CROP SCIENCE, 2003, 43 (02) : 592 - 597
  • [6] Asparagine and ureide accumulation in nodules and shoots as feedback inhibitors of N2 fixation in soybean
    Vadez, V
    Sinclair, TR
    Serraj, R
    PHYSIOLOGIA PLANTARUM, 2000, 110 (02) : 215 - 223
  • [7] THE EFFECT OF WATER DEFICIT ON N2(C2H2) FIXATION BY WHITE BEAN AND SOYBEAN
    SMITH, DL
    DIJAK, M
    HUME, DJ
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 1988, 68 (04) : 957 - 967
  • [8] N2 FIXATION (C2H2 REDUCTION) AND UREIDE CONCENTRATION IN SEVERAL SOYBEAN CULTIVARS
    MATSUNAGA, R
    MATSUMOTO, S
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CROP SCIENCE, 1986, 55 (02) : 223 - 228
  • [9] Drought tolerance and yield increase of soybean resulting from improved symbiotic N2 fixation
    Sinclair, Thomas R.
    Purcell, Larry C.
    King, C. Andy
    Sneller, Clay H.
    Chen, Pengyin
    Vadez, Vincent
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2007, 101 (01) : 68 - 71
  • [10] Selection of soybean (Glycine max) lines for increased tolerance of N2 fixation to drying soil
    Sinclair, TR
    Purcell, LC
    Vadez, V
    Serraj, R
    AGRONOMIE, 2001, 21 (6-7): : 653 - 657