A Hot-Deck Multiple Imputation Procedure for Gaps in Longitudinal Recurrent Event Histories

被引:8
|
作者
Wang, Chia-Ning [1 ]
Little, Roderick [1 ]
Nan, Bin [1 ]
Harlow, Sioban D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Biostat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Epidemiol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
Hormone treatment; Menopause; Menstrual periods; Missing data; Predictive mean matching; Terminal event; PROPOSED BLEEDING CRITERIA; MENOPAUSAL; DIARRHEA; ONSET; TIME;
D O I
10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01558.x
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
We propose a regression-based hot-deck multiple imputation method for gaps of missing data in longitudinal studies, where subjects experience a recurrent event process and a terminal event. Examples are repeated asthma episodes and death, or menstrual periods and menopause, as in our motivating application. Research interest concerns the onset time of a marker event, defined by the recurrent event process, or the duration from this marker event to the final event. Gaps in the recorded event history make it difficult to determine the onset time of the marker event, and hence, the duration from onset to the final event. Simple approaches such as jumping gap times or dropping cases with gaps have obvious limitations. We propose a procedure for imputing information in the gaps by substituting information in the gap from a matched individual with a completely recorded history in the corresponding interval. Predictive mean matching is used to incorporate information on longitudinal characteristics of the repeated process and the final event time. Multiple imputation is used to propagate imputation uncertainty. The procedure is applied to an important data set for assessing the timing and duration of the menopausal transition. The performance of the proposed method is assessed by a simulation study.
引用
收藏
页码:1573 / 1582
页数:10
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] A hot-deck multiple imputation procedure for gaps in longitudinal data on recurrent events
    Little, Roderick J.
    Yosef, Matheos
    Cain, Kevin C.
    Nan, Bin
    Harlow, Sioban D.
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2008, 27 (01) : 103 - 120
  • [2] The relationship between hot-deck multiple imputation and weighted likelihood
    Reilly, M
    Pepe, M
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1997, 16 (1-3) : 5 - 19
  • [3] Comparison of hot-deck and neural-network imputation
    Wilmot, CG
    Shivananjappa, S
    [J]. TRANSPORT SURVEY QUALITY AND INNOVATION, 2003, : 543 - 554
  • [4] Multiple hot-deck imputation for network inference from RNA sequencing data
    Imbert, Alyssa
    Valsesia, Armand
    Le Gall, Caroline
    Armenise, Claudia
    Lefebvre, Gregory
    Gourraud, Pierre-Antoine
    Viguerie, Nathalie
    Villa-Vialaneix, Nathalie
    [J]. BIOINFORMATICS, 2018, 34 (10) : 1726 - 1732
  • [5] Hot-deck imputation with SAS® arrays and macros for large surveys
    Stiller, J
    Dalzell, DR
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-THIRD ANNUAL SAS USERS GROUP INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE, 1998, : 1378 - 1383
  • [6] FINDING A FLEXIBLE HOT-DECK IMPUTATION METHOD FOR MULTINOMIAL DATA
    Andridge, Rebecca
    Bechtel, Laura
    Thompson, Katherine Jenny
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURVEY STATISTICS AND METHODOLOGY, 2021, 9 (04) : 789 - 809
  • [7] Calibrated Hot-Deck Donor Imputation Subject to Edit Restrictions
    Coutinho, Wieger
    de Waal, Ton
    Shlomo, Natalie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OFFICIAL STATISTICS, 2013, 29 (02) : 299 - 321
  • [8] Multiple imputation using an iterative hot-deck with distance-based donor selection
    Siddique, Juned
    Belin, Thomas R.
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2008, 27 (01) : 83 - 102
  • [9] Impacts of Fractional Hot-Deck Imputation on Learning and Prediction of Engineering Data
    Song, Ikkyun
    Yang, Yicheng
    Im, Jongho
    Tong, Tong
    Ceylan, Halil
    Cho, In Ho
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON KNOWLEDGE AND DATA ENGINEERING, 2020, 32 (12) : 2363 - 2373
  • [10] Weighted Hot-Deck Imputation in Farm and Fishery Household Economy Surveys
    Kim, Kyu-Seong
    Lee, Kee-Jae
    Kim, Jin
    [J]. KOREAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2005, 18 (02) : 311 - 328