Long-term findings from COMFORT-II, a phase 3 study of ruxolitinib vs best available therapy for myelofibrosis

被引:383
|
作者
Harrison, C. N. [1 ]
Vannucchi, A. M. [2 ]
Kiladjian, J-J [3 ,4 ]
Al-Ali, H. K. [5 ]
Gisslinger, H. [6 ]
Knoops, L. [7 ,8 ]
Cervantes, F. [9 ]
Jones, M. M. [10 ]
Sun, K. [10 ]
McQuitty, M. [11 ]
Stalbovskaya, V. [11 ]
Gopalakrishna, P. [11 ]
Barbui, T. [12 ]
机构
[1] Guys Hosp, Guys & St Thomas NHS Fdn Trust, London, England
[2] Univ Florence, Dept Expt & Clin Med, AOU Careggi, Ctr Res & Innovat Myeloproliferat Neoplasms CRIMM, Florence, Italy
[3] Hop St Louis, Paris, France
[4] Univ Paris Diderot, Paris, France
[5] Univ Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
[6] Med Univ Vienna, Vienna, Austria
[7] Clin Univ St Luc, Brussels, Belgium
[8] Catholic Univ Louvain, Duve Inst, Brussels, Belgium
[9] Hosp Clin Barcelona, Inst Invest Biomed August Pi & Sunyer, Barcelona, Spain
[10] Incyte Corp, Wilmington, DE USA
[11] Novartis Pharmaceut, Basel, Switzerland
[12] Osped Papa Giovanni XXIII, Res Fdn, Bergamo, Italy
关键词
MYELOPROLIFERATIVE NEOPLASMS RESEARCH; INTERNATIONAL WORKING GROUP; PROGNOSTIC SCORING SYSTEM; FOLLOW-UP; SURVIVAL; TRIALS; EFFICACY; IMPACT; SAFETY; LEUKEMIA;
D O I
10.1038/leu.2016.148
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Ruxolitinib is a Janus kinase (JAK) (JAK1/JAK2) inhibitor that has demonstrated superiority over placebo and best available therapy (BAT) in the Controlled Myelofibrosis Study with Oral JAK Inhibitor Treatment (COMFORT) studies. COMFORT-II was a randomized (2: 1), open-label phase 3 study in patients with myelofibrosis; patients randomized to BAT could crossover to ruxolitinib upon protocol-defined disease progression or after the primary end point, confounding long-term comparisons. At week 48, 28% (41/146) of patients randomized to ruxolitinib achieved. 35% decrease in spleen volume (primary end point) compared with no patients on BAT (P<0.001). Among the 78 patients (53.4%) in the ruxolitinib arm who achieved >= 35% reductions in spleen volume at any time, the probability of maintaining response was 0.48 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.35-0.60) at 5 years (median, 3.2 years). Median overall survival was not reached in the ruxolitinib arm and was 4.1 years in the BAT arm. There was a 33% reduction in risk of death with ruxolitinib compared with BAT by intent-to-treat analysis (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.44-1.02; P = 0.06); the crossover-corrected HR was 0.44 (95% CI, 0.18-1.04; P = 0.06). There was no unexpected increased incidence of adverse events with longer exposure. This final analysis showed that spleen volume reductions with ruxolitinib were maintained with continued therapy and may be associated with survival benefits.
引用
收藏
页码:1701 / 1707
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Long-term outcomes of ruxolitinib (RUX) therapy in patients (pts) with myelofibrosis (MF): 5-year update from COMFORT-I.
    Gupta, Vikas
    Verstovsek, Srdan
    Mesa, Ruben A.
    Gotlib, Jason R.
    DiPersio, John F.
    Catalano, John V.
    Deininger, Michael W. N.
    Miller, Carole Brennan
    Silver, Richard T.
    Talpaz, Moshe
    Winton, Elliott F.
    Harvey, Jimmie Huling
    Arcasoy, Murat.
    Hexner, Elizabeth O.
    Lyons, Roger M.
    Paquette, Ronald
    Raza, Azra
    Kornacki, Deanna
    Sun, Kang
    Kantarjian, Hagop M.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (15)
  • [33] A Pooled Overall Survival (OS) Analysis of 5-Year Data from the COMFORT-I and COMFORT-II Trials of Ruxolitinib for the Treatment of Myelofibrosis (MF)
    Verstovsek, Srdan
    Gupta, Vikas
    Gotlib, Jason R.
    Mesa, Ruben A.
    Vannucchi, Alessandro M.
    Kiladjian, Jean-Jacques
    Cervantes, Francisco
    Sun, William
    Gao, Jessy
    Dong, Touchuan
    Naim, Ahmad
    Gopalakrishna, Prashanth
    Harrison, Claire N.
    BLOOD, 2016, 128 (22)
  • [34] PHASE 3 RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF MOMELOTINIB VERSUS BEST AVAILABLE THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH MYELOFIBROSIS PREVIOUSLY TREATED WITH RUXOLITINIB: RESULTS OF THE SIMPLIFY-2 STUDY
    Verstovsek, S.
    Vannucchi, A. M.
    Platzbecker, U.
    Cervantes, F.
    Gupta, V.
    Lavie, D.
    Passamonti, F.
    Winton, E. F.
    Dong, H.
    Kawashima, J.
    Maltzman, J. D.
    Kiladjian, J-J.
    Harrison, C. N.
    HAEMATOLOGICA, 2017, 102 : 320 - 321
  • [37] Long-Term Efficacy and Safety Results From a Phase II Study of Ruxolitinib in Patients with Polycythemia Vera
    Verstovsek, Srdan
    Passamonti, Francesco
    Rambaldi, Alessandro
    Barosi, Giovanni
    Rosen, Peter J.
    He, Shui
    Contel, Nancy
    Mookerjee, Bijoyesh
    Rumi, Elisa
    Gattoni, Elisabetta
    Pieri, Lisa
    Cazzola, Mario
    Kantarjian, Hagop M.
    Barbui, Tiziano
    Vannucchi, Alessandro M.
    BLOOD, 2012, 120 (21)
  • [38] COST EFFECTIVENESS OF RUXOLITINIB VERSUS BEST AVAILABLE THERAPY FOR THE TREATMENT OF MYELOFIBROSIS FROM PUBLIC HEALTH PERSPECTIVE IN CHILE
    Rojas, R.
    Balmaceda, C.
    Vargas, C.
    Espinoza, M. A.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2016, 19 (07) : A590 - A590
  • [39] Ruxolitinib (RUX) vs Best Available Therapy (BAT) in patients (pts) with Glucocorticoid-Refractory chronic Graft-vs-Host Disease (cGVHD): Primary findings from the phase 3, randomized REACH3 study
    Zeiser, R.
    Polverelli, N.
    Ram, R.
    Hashmi, S.
    Chakraverty, R.
    Langmuir, P.
    Hollaender, N.
    Gowda, M.
    Stefanelli, T.
    Lee, S. J.
    Teshima, T.
    Locatelli, F.
    ONCOLOGY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2021, 44 : 65 - 66
  • [40] Phase 3 randomized trial of momelotinib (MMB) versus best available therapy (BAT) in patients with myelofibrosis (MF) previously treated with ruxolitinib (RUX).
    Harrison, Claire N.
    Vannucchi, Alessandro M.
    Platzbecker, Uwe
    Cervantes, Francisco
    Gupta, Vikas
    Lavie, David
    Passamonti, Francesco
    Winton, Elliott F.
    Dong, Hua
    Kawashima, Jun
    Maltzman, Julia D.
    Kiladjian, Jean-Jacques
    Verstovsek, Srdan
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35