Food color, flavor, and conditioned avoidance among red-winged blackbirds

被引:19
|
作者
Werner, Scott J. [1 ]
Kimball, Bruce A. [1 ]
Provenza, Frederick D. [2 ]
机构
[1] USDA, APHIS, WS, Natl Wildlife Res Ctr, Ft Collins, CO 80521 USA
[2] Utah State Univ, Dept Wildland Resources, Logan, UT 84322 USA
关键词
Agelaius phoeniceus; aversive conditioning; chemical repellent; foraging behavior; preference; sensory cue; wildlife damage management;
D O I
10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.08.002
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The relationship between food flavors and postingestive feedback enables mammalian herbivores to procure nutrients and avoid toxins within ever-changing environments. We conducted four experiments with red-winged blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus) in captivity to determine the relative roles of color and flavor cues paired with negative postingestive feedback. We first conducted baseline tests to assess preferences for colors and flavors. All blackbirds preferred red- to blue-colored food, and they preferred umami- (L-alanine) flavored to bitter/astringent food (tannic acid). We observed no difference in consumption of salty (NaCl) vs sour (citric acid) foods during baseline tests (i.e., neutral flavors). We then conditioned experimentally naive blackbirds with intraperitoneal injections of lithium chloride (LiCl) to avoid food treated with red and L-alanine, or red and NaCl (n=30 birds per conditioning group). Subsequent to conditioning with LiCl, three test groups were established from each conditioned group to evaluate color and flavor preferences, and preferences for novel color-flavor pairings (e.g., red/tannic acid vs blue/L-alanine). Blackbirds avoided red and salty food throughout the 4-day test. Avoidance conditioned with LiCl extinguished for preferred flavors, but not for colors, of food. Conditioning affected indifference for the otherwise preferred flavor and avoidance for the otherwise neutral flavor. Relative to the neutral-flavor conditioning group, the group conditioned with a preferred flavor exhibited stronger conditioned avoidance of colored food. Unlike conditioned flavor avoidance, birds were conditioned to avoid red food only when blue food was made familiar prior to conditioning. Collectively, these results illustrate that blackbirds used affective processes (flavor-feedback relationships) to shift preference for both novel and familiar flavors, and cognitive associations (colors) to avoid food, subsequent to toxin exposure. We discuss the opportunities afforded by affective and cognitive processing for reducing agricultural damage caused by blackbirds. (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:110 / 117
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] FOOD AVOIDANCE BY RED-WINGED BLACKBIRDS CONDITIONED WITH A PYRAZINE ODOR
    AVERY, ML
    NELMS, CO
    [J]. AUK, 1990, 107 (03): : 544 - 549
  • [2] 'Red-Winged Blackbirds'
    Rogers, BH
    [J]. DESCANT, 2003, 34 (03): : 221 - 222
  • [3] Seed color avoidance by captive red-winged blackbirds and boat-tailed grackles
    Avery, ML
    Humphrey, JS
    Decker, DG
    McGrane, AP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1999, 63 (03): : 1003 - 1008
  • [4] VARIATION IN PROMISCUITY AMONG RED-WINGED BLACKBIRDS
    ROBERTS, TA
    KENNELLY, JJ
    [J]. WILSON BULLETIN, 1980, 92 (01): : 110 - 112
  • [5] SALIENCE OF COLORS IN AVOIDANCE-LEARNING BY RED-WINGED BLACKBIRDS
    MASON, JR
    REIDINGER, RF
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE PSYCHONOMIC SOCIETY, 1982, 20 (03) : 156 - 156
  • [6] AVOIDANCE OF METHIOCARB-POISONED APPLES BY RED-WINGED BLACKBIRDS
    MASON, JR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1989, 53 (03): : 836 - 840
  • [7] RED BANDS AND RED-WINGED BLACKBIRDS
    BELETSKY, LD
    ORIANS, GH
    [J]. CONDOR, 1989, 91 (04): : 993 - 995
  • [8] FOOD SIZE, FOOD TYPE, AND FORAGING SITES OF RED-WINGED BLACKBIRDS
    WILSON, SW
    [J]. WILSON BULLETIN, 1978, 90 (04): : 511 - 520
  • [9] BREEDING RED-WINGED BLACKBIRDS IN CAPTIVITY
    KNOS, CJ
    STICKLEY, AR
    [J]. AUK, 1974, 91 (04): : 808 - 816
  • [10] ARE FEMALE RED-WINGED BLACKBIRDS TERRITORIAL
    SEARCY, WA
    [J]. ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1986, 34 : 1381 - 1391