Modelling heterogeneity: on the problem of group comparisons with logistic regression and the potential of the heterogeneous choice model

被引:2
|
作者
Tutz, Gerhard [1 ]
机构
[1] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Akad Str 1, D-80799 Munich, Germany
关键词
Heterogeneous choice model; Location-scale model; Heterogeneity of variances; Logit model; Group comparisons; Non-contingent response style; RESPONSE STYLES; PROBIT COEFFICIENTS; LOGIT; STRATIFICATION; REGULARIZATION; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1007/s11634-019-00381-8
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
The comparison of coefficients of logit models obtained for different groups is widely considered as problematic because of possible heterogeneity of residual variances in latent variables. It is shown that the heterogeneous logit model can be used to account for this type of heterogeneity by considering reduced models that are identified. A model selection strategy is proposed that can distinguish between effects that are due to heterogeneity and substantial interaction effects. In contrast to the common understanding, the heterogeneous logit model is considered as a model that contains effect modifying terms, which are not necessarily linked to variances but can also represent other types of heterogeneity in the population. The alternative interpretation of the parameters in the heterogeneous logit model makes it a flexible tool that can account for various sources of heterogeneity. Although the model is typically derived from latent variables it is important that for the interpretation of parameters the reference to latent variables is not needed. Latent variables are considered as a motivation for binary models, but the effects in the models can be interpreted as effects on the binary response.
引用
收藏
页码:517 / 542
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Modelling heterogeneity: on the problem of group comparisons with logistic regression and the potential of the heterogeneous choice model
    Gerhard Tutz
    [J]. Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, 2020, 14 : 517 - 542
  • [2] On Group Comparisons With Logistic Regression Models
    Kuha, Jouni
    Mills, Colin
    [J]. SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 2020, 49 (02) : 498 - 525
  • [3] A comparison of model choice strategies for logistic regression
    Markku Karhunen
    [J]. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2024, 9 (01) : 37 - 52
  • [4] A comparison of model choice strategies for logistic regression
    Karhunen, Markku
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DATA AND INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2024, 9 (01) : 37 - 52
  • [5] Modelling Job Satisfaction Using a Logistic Regression Model
    Cavusoglu, Behiye
    Cek, Kemal
    Eyupoglu, Serife Z.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ANALYSIS AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS (ICAAM 2020), 2021, 2325
  • [6] Comparation of logistic regression methods and discrete choice model in the selection of habitats
    Vergara Cardozo, Sandra
    Manly, Bryan Frederick John
    dos Santos Dias, Carlos Tadeu
    [J]. SCIENTIA AGRICOLA, 2010, 67 (03): : 327 - 333
  • [7] Predicting the malignant and hyperplastic potential of polyps: A logistic regression model
    Kwasnicka, L.
    Griffiths, A.
    Penketh, R.
    Jones, A.
    Bruen, E.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2017, 124 : 15 - 15
  • [8] Route choice modelling in urban transportation networks using fuzzy logic and logistic regression methods
    Murat, Yetis Sazi
    Uludag, Nurcan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC & INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH, 2008, 67 (01): : 19 - 27
  • [9] Cluster-Based Logistic Regression Model for Holiday Travel Mode Choice
    Li, Juan
    Weng, Jinxian
    Shao, Chunfu
    Guo, Hongwei
    [J]. GREEN INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM AND SAFETY, 2016, 138 : 729 - 737
  • [10] Bayesian Logistic Regression Model Choice via Laplace-Metropolis Algorithm
    Eskandari, Farzad
    Meshkani, M. Reza
    [J]. JIRSS-JOURNAL OF THE IRANIAN STATISTICAL SOCIETY, 2006, 5 (1-2): : 9 - 24