Prioritizing river basins for intensive monitoring and assessment by the US Geological Survey

被引:12
|
作者
Van Metre, Peter C. [1 ]
Qi, Sharon [2 ]
Deacon, Jeffrey [3 ]
Dieter, Cheryl [4 ]
Driscoll, Jessica M. [5 ]
Fienen, Michael [6 ]
Kenney, Terry [7 ]
Lambert, Patrick [7 ]
Lesmes, David [8 ]
Mason, Christopher A. [3 ]
Mueller-Solger, Anke [9 ]
Musgrove, Marylynn [1 ]
Painter, Jaime [10 ]
Rosenberry, Donald [5 ]
Sprague, Lori [5 ]
Tesoriero, Anthony J. [2 ]
Windham-Myers, Lisamarie [11 ]
Wolock, David [12 ]
机构
[1] US Geol Survey, Austin, TX 78754 USA
[2] US Geol Survey, Portland, OR USA
[3] US Geol Survey, Richmond, VA USA
[4] US Geol Survey, Baltimore, MD USA
[5] US Geol Survey, Lakewood, CO 80225 USA
[6] US Geol Survey, Madison, WI USA
[7] US Geol Survey, West Valley City, UT USA
[8] US Geol Survey, 959 Natl Ctr, Reston, VA 22092 USA
[9] US Geol Survey, Sacramento, CA USA
[10] US Geol Survey, Norcross, CA USA
[11] US Geol Survey, Menlo Pk, CA USA
[12] US Geol Survey, Lawrence, KS USA
关键词
Monitoring design; Federal research; Hydrology; Basin selection; WATER-QUALITY; NETWORK DESIGN;
D O I
10.1007/s10661-020-08403-1
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The US Geological Survey (USGS) is currently (2020) integrating its water science programs to better address the nation's greatest water resource challenges now and into the future. This integration will rely, in part, on data from 10 or more intensively monitored river basins from across the USA. A team of USGS scientists was convened to develop a systematic, quantitative approach to prioritize candidate basins for this monitoring investment to ensure that, as a group, the 10 basins will support the assessment and forecasting objectives of the major USGS water science programs. Candidate basins were the level-4 hydrologic units (HUC04) with some of the smaller HUC04s being combined; median candidate-basin area is 46,600 km(2). Candidate basins for the contiguous United States (CONUS) were grouped into 18 hydrologic regions. Ten geospatial variables representing land use, climate change, water use, water-balance components, streamflow alteration, fire risk, and ecosystem sensitivity were selected to rank candidate basins within each of the 18 hydrologic regions. The two highest ranking candidate basins in each of the 18 regions were identified as finalists for selection as "Integrated Water Science Basins"; final selection will consider input from a variety of stakeholders. The regional framework, with only one basin selected per region, ensures that as a group, the basins represent the range in major drivers of the hydrologic cycle. Ranking within each region, primarily based on anthropogenic stressors of water resources, ensures that settings representing important water-resource challenges for the nation will be studied.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prioritizing river basins for intensive monitoring and assessment by the US Geological Survey
    Peter C. Van Metre
    Sharon Qi
    Jeffrey Deacon
    Cheryl Dieter
    Jessica M. Driscoll
    Michael Fienen
    Terry Kenney
    Patrick Lambert
    David Lesmes
    Christopher A. Mason
    Anke Mueller-Solger
    Marylynn Musgrove
    Jaime Painter
    Donald Rosenberry
    Lori Sprague
    Anthony J. Tesoriero
    Lisamarie Windham-Myers
    David Wolock
    Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2020, 192
  • [2] Correction to: Prioritizing river basins for intensive monitoring and assessment by the US Geological Survey
    Peter C. Van Metre
    Sharon Qi
    Jeffrey Deacon
    Cheryl Dieter
    Jessica M. Driscoll
    Michael Fienen
    Terry Kenney
    Patrick Lambert
    David Lesmes
    Christopher A. Mason
    Anke Mueller-Solger
    Marylynn Musgrove
    Jaime Painter
    Donald Rosenberry
    Lori Sprague
    Anthony J. Tesoriero
    Lisamarie Windham-Myers
    David Wolock
    Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2023, 195
  • [3] Prioritizing river basins for intensive monitoring and assessment by the US Geological Survey (vol 192, 458, 2020)
    Van Metre, Peter C.
    Qi, Sharon
    Deacon, Jeffrey
    Dieter, Cheryl
    Driscoll, Jessica M.
    Fienen, Michael
    Kenney, Terry
    Lambert, Patrick
    Lesmes, David
    Mason, Christopher A.
    Mueller-Solger, Anke
    Musgrove, Marylynn
    Painter, Jaime
    Rosenberry, Donald
    Sprague, Lori
    Tesoriero, Anthony J.
    Windham-Myers, Lisamarie
    Wolock, David
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2023, 195 (06)
  • [4] Correction to: Prioritizing river basins for intensive monitoring and assessment by the US Geological Survey (Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, (2020), 192, 7, (458), 10.1007/s10661-020-08403-1)
    Van Metre, Peter C.
    Qi, Sharon
    Deacon, Jeffrey
    Dieter, Cheryl
    Driscoll, Jessica M.
    Fienen, Michael
    Kenney, Terry
    Lambert, Patrick
    Lesmes, David
    Mason, Christopher A.
    Mueller-Solger, Anke
    Musgrove, Marylynn
    Painter, Jaime
    Rosenberry, Donald
    Sprague, Lori
    Tesoriero, Anthony J.
    Windham-Myers, Lisamarie
    Wolock, David
    Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2023, 195 (06):
  • [5] Prioritizing US Geological Survey science on salinization and salinity in candidate and selected priority river basins
    Conaway, Christopher H.
    Baker, Nancy T.
    Brown, Craig J.
    Green, Christopher T.
    Kent, Douglas B.
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2024, 197 (01)
  • [6] Prioritizing river basins for nutrient studies
    Anthony J. Tesoriero
    Dale M. Robertson
    Christopher T. Green
    J. K. Böhlke
    Judson W. Harvey
    Sharon L. Qi
    Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2024, 196
  • [7] Prioritizing river basins for nutrient studies
    Tesoriero, Anthony J.
    Robertson, Dale M.
    Green, Christopher T.
    Bohlke, J. K.
    Harvey, Judson W.
    Qi, Sharon L.
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2024, 196 (03)
  • [8] US Geological Survey
    不详
    ISSUES IN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 15 (02) : 96 - 96
  • [9] The US Geological Survey
    Comstock, TB
    SCIENCE, 1907, 25 : 309 - 311
  • [10] An evaluation of the US Geological Survey World Petroleum Assessment 2000
    Klett, TP
    Gautier, DL
    Ahlbrandt, TS
    AAPG BULLETIN, 2005, 89 (08) : 1033 - 1042