Conservation of carbon resources and values on public lands: A case study from the National Wildlife Refuge System

被引:1
|
作者
Zhu, Zhiliang [1 ]
Middleton, Beth [2 ]
Pindilli, Emily [3 ]
Johnson, Darren [2 ]
Johnson, Kurt [4 ]
Covington, Scott [4 ]
机构
[1] US Geol Survey, 959 Natl Ctr, Reston, VA 22092 USA
[2] US Geol Survey, Wetland & Aquat Res Ctr, Lafayette, LA USA
[3] US Geol Survey, Sci & Decis Ctr, USGS Northeast Reg, Reston, VA USA
[4] US Fish & Wildlife Serv, Falls Church, VA USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2022年 / 17卷 / 01期
关键词
OLD-GROWTH FORESTS; SEQUESTRATION; BENEFITS; STORAGE; RATES; FIRE;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0262218
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Public lands in the United States are those land areas managed by federal, state, and county governments for public purposes such as preservation and recreation. Protecting carbon resources and increasing carbon sequestration capacity are compatible with public land management objectives for healthy and resilient habitats, i.e., managing habitats for the benefit of wildlife and ecosystem services can simultaneously capture and store carbon. To evaluate the effect of public land management on carbon storage and review carbon management as part of the land management objectives, we used existing data of carbon stock and net ecosystem carbon balance in a study of the National Wildlife Refuge System (NWRS), a public land management program of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service). Total carbon storage of the 364 refuges studied was 16.6 PgC, with a mean value 42,981 gCm(-2). We used mixed modeling with Bonferroni adjustment techniques to analyze the effect of time since refuge designation on carbon storage. In general, older refuges store more carbon per unit area than younger refuges. In addition to the age factor, carbon resources are variable by regions and habitat types protected in the refuges. Mean carbon stock and the rate of sequestration are higher within refuges than outside refuges, but the statistical comparison of 364 refuges analyzed in this study was not significant. We also used the social cost of carbon to analyze the annual benefits of sequestrating carbon in these publicly managed lands in the United States, which is over $976 million per year in avoided CO2 emissions via specific conservation management actions. We examine case studies of management, particularly with respect to Service cooperation activities with The Conservation Fund (TCF) Go Zero (R) Program, Trust for Public Land (TPL) and individuals. Additional opportunities exist in improving techniques to maximize carbon resources in refuges, while continuing to meet the core purpose and need of the NWRS.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The National Wildlife Refuge System: A century of conservation, realizing the enduring values of national wildlife refuges
    Nussman, JM
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE SIXTY-EIGHTH NORTH AMERICAN WILDLIFE AND NATURAL RESOURCES CONFERENCE, 2003, : 55 - 61
  • [2] The Cost of Conservation: The National Wildlife Refuge System
    Smiley, Sarah A.
    [J]. BIOSCIENCE, 2008, 58 (11) : 1014 - 1014
  • [3] New directions in conservation for the National Wildlife Refuge System
    Meretsky, VJ
    Fischman, RL
    Karr, JR
    Ashe, DM
    Scott, JM
    Noss, RF
    Schroeder, RL
    [J]. BIOSCIENCE, 2006, 56 (02) : 135 - 143
  • [4] The national wildlife refuge system: A century of conservation - Celebrating a century of conservation
    Williams, SA
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE SIXTY-EIGHTH NORTH AMERICAN WILDLIFE AND NATURAL RESOURCES CONFERENCE, 2003, : 21 - 33
  • [5] AGRICULTURAL LANDS - CONSERVATION FARMING AND ITS VALUES TO WILD LIVING RESOURCES - AGRICULTURAL LANDS AND WILDLIFE - A PERSPECTIVE
    BURGER, GV
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE NORTH AMERICAN WILDLIFE AND NATURAL RESOURCES CONFERENCE, 1985, 50 : 133 - 134
  • [6] The State of Bats in Conservation Planning for the National Wildlife Refuge System, With Recommendations
    Dixon, Michael D.
    Heist, Kevin
    Tinsley, Karl
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FISH AND WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2013, 4 (02): : 406 - 422
  • [7] Historical and recent fire ecology on national wildlife refuges: a case study on Aransas National Wildlife Refuge
    Golden, Katherine E.
    Hemingway, Benjamin L.
    Frazier, Amy E.
    Harrell, Wade
    Fuhlendorf, Samuel D.
    Davis, Craig A.
    [J]. FIRE ECOLOGY, 2024, 20 (01):
  • [8] Beyond Trust Species: The Conservation Potential of the National Wildlife Refuge System in the Wake of Climate Change
    Fischman, Robert L.
    Adamcik, Robert S.
    [J]. NATURAL RESOURCES JOURNAL, 2011, 51 (01) : 1 - 33
  • [9] Lessons learned from invasive species management in the National Wildlife Refuge System
    Lusk, M
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2005, 230 : U142 - U142
  • [10] Adaptive management in the US National Wildlife Refuge System: Science-management partnerships for conservation delivery
    Moore, Clinton T.
    Lonsdorf, Eric V.
    Knutson, Melinda G.
    Laskowski, Harold P.
    Lor, Socheata K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2011, 92 (05) : 1395 - 1402