Sustainable development assessment from a capitals perspective: Analytical structure and indicator selection criteria

被引:46
|
作者
da Silva, Juvancir [1 ,2 ]
Fernandes, Valdir [3 ]
Limont, Marcelo [1 ]
Rauen, William Bonino [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Posit, Grad Programme Environm Management, R Prof Pedro Viriato Parigot de Souza 5300, BR-81280330 Curitiba, Parana, Brazil
[2] Univ Estadual Ponta Grossa, Dept Business Management, Praca Santos Andrade 01, BR-84010919 Ponta Grossa, Parana, Brazil
[3] Univ Tecnol Fed Parana, Grad Programme Urban Environm Sustainabil, Av Sete Setembro 3165, BR-80230901 Curitiba, Parana, Brazil
[4] Univ Fed Parana, Dept Hydraul & Sanitat, Av Cel Francisco H dos Santos 210, BR-81130001 Curitiba, Parana, Brazil
关键词
Sustainable development capitals; Indicator system; Selection criteria; Analytical structure; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; INFRASTRUCTURE; GOVERNANCE; FRAMEWORK; NETWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110147
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Sustainable development assessment has been conducted considering its various dimensions, such as environmental, social, cultural and economic. In this paper, the representation of such dimensions is undertaken from the perspective of the natural, social and built capitals. These dimensions are usually represented by indicators, indexes and systems of indicators, but their abundance in the technical and scientific literatures without adequate analytical structures can impair assessment quality and speed. This study aimed to propose a structure for sustainable development assessment whereby key aspects and indicators can be identified, prioritised and meaningfully used from the perspective of sustainable development capitals. Content analysis of selected international papers and technical reports was undertaken to identify relevant analysis elements and their hierarchical order. This has led to a four-tier framework composed of three capitals, seven categories, 19 subcategories and 52 attributes, each of which can be measured with the aid of one or more locally relevant indicator(s) in the context of sustainable development assessment. Selection criteria for such indicators were compiled from the literature and are presented in terms of their political, management, data quality and economic relevance. This study may contribute to the development and refinement of structured sustainable development indicator systems with less analytical ambiguity, overlapping and gaps, and hence improve the representativeness of future assessment efforts.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Development of sustainable assessment criteria for building materials selection
    Akadiri, Peter
    Olomolaiye, Paul
    ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECTURAL MANAGEMENT, 2012, 19 (06) : 666 - +
  • [2] Water sustainability assessment from the perspective of sustainable development capitals: Conceptual model and index based on literature review
    da Silva, Juvancir
    Fernandes, Valdir
    Limont, Marcelo
    Dziedzic, Mauricio
    Andreoli, Cleverson V.
    Rauen, William Bonino
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 254
  • [3] Sustainable assessment criteria for airport runway material selection: a fuzzy analytical hierarchy approach
    AlKheder, Sharaf
    AlKandari, Dalal
    AlYatama, Sarah
    ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECTURAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 29 (08) : 3091 - 3113
  • [4] Sustainable development goals as a guideline for indicator selection in Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment
    Wulf, Christina
    Werker, Jasmin
    Zapp, Petra
    Schreiber, Andrea
    Schloer, Holger
    Kuckshinrichs, Wilhelm
    25TH CIRP LIFE CYCLE ENGINEERING (LCE) CONFERENCE, 2018, 69 : 59 - 65
  • [5] Assessment criteria for the Selection of a Care facility from the Perspective of the Population
    Geraedts, M.
    Brechtel, T.
    Zoell, R.
    Hermeling, P.
    GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2012, 74 (8-9) : 555 - 555
  • [6] A discourse-analytical perspective on sustainability assessment: interpreting sustainable development in practice
    Jean Hugé
    Tom Waas
    Farid Dahdouh-Guebas
    Nico Koedam
    Thomas Block
    Sustainability Science, 2013, 8 : 187 - 198
  • [7] A discourse-analytical perspective on sustainability assessment: interpreting sustainable development in practice
    Huge, Jean
    Waas, Tom
    Dahdouh-Guebas, Farid
    Koedam, Nico
    Block, Thomas
    SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2013, 8 (02) : 187 - 198
  • [8] An Integrated Competitiveness Assessment of the Baltic Capitals Based on the Principles of Sustainable Development
    Cincikaite, Renata
    Meidute-Kavaliauskiene, Ieva
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (07)
  • [9] Study on the selection of equity structure of PPP waste-to-energy projects from the perspective of sustainable development
    Hou Wenhua
    You, Siqi
    Zhang, Yuqing
    JOURNAL OF PLANNING LITERATURE, 2023, 38 (04) : 628 - 628
  • [10] Study on the selection of equity structure of PPP waste-to-energy projects from the perspective of sustainable development
    Hou, Wenhua
    You, Siqi
    Zhang, Yuqing
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 65 (11) : 2099 - 2123