What happens to non-responders in cardiac resynchronization therapy?

被引:3
|
作者
Rio, Pedro [1 ]
Oliveira, Mario Martins [1 ]
Cunha, Pedro Silva [1 ]
da Silva, Manuel Nogueira [1 ]
Branco, Luisa Moura [1 ]
Galrinho, Ana [1 ]
Soares, Rui [1 ]
Feliciano, Joana [1 ]
Pimenta, Ricardo [1 ]
Ferreira, Rui Cruz [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Hosp Lisboa Cent, Hosp Santa Marta, Dept Cardiol, Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
Heart failure; Cardiac resynchronization therapy; Clinical response; Prognosis; CHRONIC HEART-FAILURE; LONG-TERM SURVIVAL; IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATOR; FOLLOW-UP; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC RESPONSE; CLINICAL IMPROVEMENT; PROSPECT PREDICTORS; MADIT-CRT; CARE-HF; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.repc.2017.02.017
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction and Objectives: Left ventricular reverse remodeling (LVRR) is strongly related to the long-term prognosis of patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The aim of this study was to assess the long-term clinical outcome of patients without LVRR at six months after CRT implantation and to determine the prognostic impact of clinical response in this population. Methods: We analyzed 178 consecutive patients who underwent successful CRT device implantation (age 64 +/- 11 years; 69% male; 89% in New York Heart Association [NYHA] functional class III; 35% with ischemic cardiomyopathy). Clinical status and echocardiographic parameters were determined before and six months after CRT implantation. We identified those without criteria for LVRR (>= 10% increase in left ventricular ejection fraction with >= 15% reduction in left ventricular end-systolic diameter compared to baseline). Clinical responders were defined by a sustained improvement of at least one NYHA functional class. Results: At six-month assessment after CRT, 109 (61%) patients showed LVRR. During a mean follow-up of 56 +/- 21 months, 47 (26%) patients died, with higher mortality in the group without LVRR (36% vs. 20%, p=0.023). Clinical response was greater in patients with LVRR (88% vs. 55%, p<0.001). In patients without LVRR, clinical response to CRT was the strongest independent predictor of survival (hazard ratio: 0.120; 95% confidence interval: 0.039-0.366; p<0.001). Conclusion: Although patients without LVRR six months after CRT implantation had a worse prognosis, with higher all-cause mortality, clinical response can be an independent predictor of survival in this population. (C) 2017 Sociedade Portuguesa de Cardiologia. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:885 / 892
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Therapy of Non-Responders to Cardiac Resynchronization
    Demming, Thomas
    Sandrock, Sarah
    Bonnemeier, Hendrik
    [J]. AKTUELLE KARDIOLOGIE, 2018, 7 (06) : 470 - 475
  • [2] Response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: what about the non-responders?
    Maria Ines Barradas Da Silva, M.
    Duarte, F.
    Coutinho Dos Santos, I.
    Resendes De Oliveira, L.
    Serena, C.
    Fontes, A.
    Viveiros Monteiro, A.
    Machado, C.
    Dourado, R.
    Santos, E.
    Pelicano, N.
    Pacheco, M.
    Tavares, A.
    Martins, D.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2022, 24 : 8 - 8
  • [3] Optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy in non-responders
    Sepsi, Milan
    Krivan, Lubomir
    Kozak, Milan
    Sebo, Marek
    Poloczek, Martin
    Jarkovsky, Jiri
    Rybka, Lukas
    Kubkova, Lenka
    Vlasinova, Jitka
    Spinar, Jindrich
    [J]. COR ET VASA, 2013, 55 (04) : E293 - E300
  • [4] How to identify non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Catanzariti, Domenico
    Maines, Massimiliano
    Angheben, Carlo
    [J]. GIORNALE ITALIANO DI CARDIOLOGIA, 2012, 13 (10) : 152S - 156S
  • [5] Cardiac contractility modulation in non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Naegele, H.
    Behrens, S.
    Eisermann, C.
    [J]. EUROPACE, 2008, 10 (12): : 1375 - 1380
  • [6] Detrimental effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy on the non-responders
    Luo, Xiu-Xia
    Fang, Fang
    Chui, Ka-lung
    Gan, Shufen
    Ma, Zhan
    Yu, Cheuk-Man
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 197 : 203 - 205
  • [7] Pacing interventions in non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Wijesuriya, Nadeev
    Elliott, Mark K.
    Mehta, Vishal
    De Vere, Felicity
    Strocchi, Marina
    Behar, Jonathan M.
    Niederer, Steven A.
    Rinaldi, Christopher A.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [8] Pacemaker optimization in cardiac resynchronization therapy non-responders
    Bank, Alan J.
    Kelly, Aaron S.
    Burns, Kevin
    Thelen, Andrea M.
    Adler, Stuart W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2006, 12 (06) : S59 - S59
  • [9] Avoiding non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy: a practical guide
    Daubert, Claude
    Behar, Nathalie
    Martins, Raphael P.
    Mabo, Philippe
    Leclercq, Christophe
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2017, 38 (19) : 1463 - 1472C
  • [10] Non-Responders to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy - The Magnitude of the Problem and the Issues
    Auricchio, Angelo
    Prinzen, Frits W.
    [J]. CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2011, 75 (03) : 521 - 527