Mandibular asymmetries and associated factors in orthodontic and orthognathic surgery patients
被引:27
|
作者:
Thiesen, Guilherme
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
St Louis Univ, Dept Orthodont, St Louis, MO 63103 USA
Univ Southern Santa Catarina, Dept Orthodont, Florianopolis, SC, BrazilSt Louis Univ, Dept Orthodont, St Louis, MO 63103 USA
Thiesen, Guilherme
[1
,2
]
Gribel, Bruno F.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Michigan, Dept Orthodont, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USASt Louis Univ, Dept Orthodont, St Louis, MO 63103 USA
Gribel, Bruno F.
[3
]
Freitas, Maria Perpetua M.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Luterana Brasil, Dept Orthodont, Canoas, RS, BrazilSt Louis Univ, Dept Orthodont, St Louis, MO 63103 USA
Freitas, Maria Perpetua M.
[4
]
Oliver, Donald R.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
St Louis Univ, Dept Orthodont, St Louis, MO 63103 USASt Louis Univ, Dept Orthodont, St Louis, MO 63103 USA
Oliver, Donald R.
[1
]
Kim, Ki Beom
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
St Louis Univ, Dept Orthodont, St Louis, MO 63103 USASt Louis Univ, Dept Orthodont, St Louis, MO 63103 USA
Kim, Ki Beom
[1
]
机构:
[1] St Louis Univ, Dept Orthodont, St Louis, MO 63103 USA
[2] Univ Southern Santa Catarina, Dept Orthodont, Florianopolis, SC, Brazil
[3] Univ Michigan, Dept Orthodont, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] Univ Luterana Brasil, Dept Orthodont, Canoas, RS, Brazil
Objectives: To estimate the prevalence of mandibular asymmetries in orthodontic and orthognathic surgery patients and to investigate demographic and skeletal factors associated with this disharmony. Materials and Methods: Cone-beam computed tomography images of 1178 individuals aged 19 through 60 years with complete dentitions were analyzed. Outcomes were classified as relative mandibular symmetry, moderate asymmetry, and severe asymmetry. Factors recorded included sex, age, side of mandibular deviation, sagittal jaw relationship, vertical skeletal pattern, angle of the cranial base, and maxillary asymmetry. Ordinal logistic regression was used to estimate simple and adjusted odds ratios (OR) for the individuals with moderate and severe mandibular asymmetry, as well as 95% confidence intervals. Results: Prevalence values of 55.2%, 27.2%, and 17.6% were observed for relative mandibular symmetry, moderate asymmetry, and severe asymmetry, respectively. An independent association with the side of mandibular deviation and the presence of maxillary asymmetry was observed, both for subjects with moderate mandibular asymmetry (left side: OR 1.50; 95% CI: 1.01-2.24 / maxillary asymmetry: OR 2.07; 95% CI: 1.11-3.76) and for those with severe asymmetry (left side: OR 2.09; 95% CI: 1.27-3.44 / maxillary asymmetry: OR 4.93; 95% CI: 2.64-9.20). Conclusions: Moderate and severe mandibular asymmetries were present in 44.8% of the sample, being associated with the side of mandibular deviation and with maxillary asymmetry.