Evaluating the Productivity of Social Work Scholars Using the h-Index

被引：41
|
作者：
Lacasse, Jeffrey R. [1 ]
Hodge, David R. [1 ]
Bean, Kristen F. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Arizona State Univ, Sch Social Work, Coll Publ Programs, 411 N Cent Ave,Suite 800, Phoenix, AZ 85004 USA
来源：
RESEARCH ON SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE | 2011年 / 21卷 / 05期
关键词：
evidence-based practice; bibliometrics; quantitative; GOOGLE SCHOLAR; HIRSCH-INDEX; BIBLIOMETRIC INDICATORS; CITATION ANALYSIS; SCIENCE; IMPACT; PUBLICATION; QUALITY;
D O I：
10.1177/1049731511405069
中图分类号：
C916 [社会工作、社会管理、社会规划];
学科分类号：
1204 ;
摘要：
Objectives: This article reports the first estimated h-index values for social work faculty. Methods: Multiple raters blindly assessed two samples of faculty (1) tenure-track faculty at institutions listed in the U.S. News and World Report top 10 (n = 337) and (2) tenure-track editorial board members of 5 highly ranked social work journals (n = 215). Results: Intraclass correlation coefficients for h-index values among the multiple raters ranged from .83 to .92, indicating good reliability. For faculty at top 10 institutions, mean estimated h-index values were 3.97 (SD = 2.87) for assistant professors; 8.59 (SD = 3.72) for associate professors; and 16.14 (SD = 8.35) for full professors. Values for editorial board members were generally similar. Conclusions: These are the first such published data; further research is needed.
引用
收藏
页码：599 / 607
页数：9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparing the research productivity of social work doctoral programs using the h-Index
    Smith, Thomas E.
    Jacobs, Kat S.
    Osteen, Philip J.
    Carter, T. Edison
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2018, 116 (03) : 1513 - 1530
  • [2] Comparing the research productivity of social work doctoral programs using the h-Index
    Thomas E. Smith
    Kat S. Jacobs
    Philip J. Osteen
    T. Edison Carter
    [J]. Scientometrics, 2018, 116 : 1513 - 1530
  • [3] Gender comparisons of social work faculty using H-Index scores
    Carter, T. Edison
    Smith, Thomas E.
    Osteen, Philip J.
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2017, 111 (03) : 1547 - 1557
  • [4] Gender comparisons of social work faculty using H-Index scores
    T. Edison Carter
    Thomas E. Smith
    Philip J. Osteen
    [J]. Scientometrics, 2017, 111 : 1547 - 1557
  • [5] American Social Work and Psychology Faculty Members' Scholarly Productivity: A Controlled Comparison of Citation Impact Using the h-Index
    Barner, John R.
    Holosko, Michael J.
    Thyer, Bruce A.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK, 2014, 44 (08): : 2448 - 2458
  • [6] The H-index and First -author H -index of Chinese Scholars in LIS
    Chen, Yuecong
    Liu, Zongqi
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2016 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MECHATRONICS, COMPUTER AND EDUCATION INFORMATIONIZATION (MCEI 2016), 2016, 130 : 1107 - 1111
  • [7] Scholarly Productivity of Social Work Faculty at Historically Black Colleges and Universities: Are h-Index Scores a Suitable Measure?
    Marshall, Isiah, Jr.
    Smith, Belinda Davis
    Green, Makeba T.
    Anderson, Brian
    Harry, Sonja V.
    Byrd, Yolanda M.
    Pratt-Harris, Natasha C.
    Bolden, Errol S.
    Hill, Solomon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK EDUCATION, 2016, 52 (01) : 95 - 107
  • [8] Academic Productivity in Psychiatry: Benchmarks for the H-Index
    MacMaster, Frank P.
    Swansburg, Rose
    Rittenbach, Katherine
    [J]. ACADEMIC PSYCHIATRY, 2017, 41 (04) : 452 - 454
  • [9] Academic Productivity in Psychiatry: Benchmarks for the H-Index
    Frank P. MacMaster
    Rose Swansburg
    Katherine Rittenbach
    [J]. Academic Psychiatry, 2017, 41 : 452 - 454
  • [10] On the use of the h-index in evaluating chemical research
    Rosaria Ciriminna
    Mario Pagliaro
    [J]. Chemistry Central Journal, 7
12345