A human-centered review of life cycle assessments of bioplastics

被引:8
|
作者
Morris, Monica I. Rodriguez [1 ]
Hicks, Andrea L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 2208 Engn Hall,1415 Engn Dr, Madison, WI 53706 USA
来源
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Bioplastic; Plastic; Life cycle assessment; Human behavior; Sorting behavior; End of life; DEGRADATION; PLASTICS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s11367-021-02001-0
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Purpose Bioplastics are an often-touted alternative to reduce the environmental impacts of plastic usage, and potentially reduce reliance on petroleum sources, when compared to conventional plastics. Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a tool used to quantify the comparable environmental impacts throughout a product's life cycle. Although existing literature has focused on the raw materials and includes stylized use and disposal scenarios, gaps exist related to the role of human behavior and its subsequent environmental impact due to the real-world usage and disposal of bioplastic products. This is in part due to challenges in fully understanding the role of human behavior and incorporating it into LCA to generate meaningful results. This work seeks to identify these gaps through a review of current literature. The work contained herein is written from a United States (US) perspective with its solid waste infrastructure in mind and challenges specific to the US. Materials and methods A review of existing literature on human behavior in disposal of conventional plastics and bioplastics, and the degree of incorporation of in LCA studies, is conducted. This allowed for the identification of current gaps within the literature, such as the role of human behavior and decision-making, within the end-of-life scenarios. Results and discussion There is a significant body of literature that analyzes the cradle-to-gate impact of bio-based bioplastics from an LCA perspective. However, user behavior and end of life are studied less due to the challenges of predicting human behavior at disposal, modeling the boundaries, and issues of location specificity. There is conflicting evidence as to the benefits and adverse impacts of bioplastics when compared with conventional plastics, which may be further clarified through the incorporation of human behavior in the end of life of the bioplastic and conventional plastic products. Conclusions Bioplastics have been suggested as an opportunity to reduce the environmental impacts of plastic usage throughout their life cycle. Portions of the bioplastic life cycle have been well quantified in literature, such as raw materials and manufacturing, while the end of life has largely been incorporated as stylized scenarios. Bioplastic LCA literature does not fully capture the effects of true disposal in its findings. In order to capture these effects, a focus on the junction between end-of-consumer-use and entry into waste collection system is needed. To generate more comprehensive and holistic assessments, more research is required as to the role of human behavior and its consequential environmental impacts. This will lead to more realistic modeling and society level forecasts as to the comparative environmental impacts of bioplastic usage.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 172
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A human-centered review of life cycle assessments of bioplastics
    Monica I. Rodriguez Morris
    Andrea L. Hicks
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2022, 27 : 157 - 172
  • [2] A review of bioplastics at end-of-life: Linking experimental biodegradation studies and life cycle impact assessments
    Van Roijen, Elisabeth C. A.
    Miller, Sabbie A.
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2022, 181
  • [3] Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence, a review
    Domfeh, Emmanuel Adjei
    Weyori, Benjamin Asubam
    Appiahene, Peter
    Mensah, Jacob
    Awarayi, Nicodemus Songose
    [J]. TechRxiv, 2022,
  • [4] A Human-Centered Review of Algorithms in Homelessness Research
    Moon, Erina Seh-Young
    Guha, Shion
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2024 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYTEMS, CHI 2024, 2024,
  • [5] A Survey of Human-Centered Evaluations in Human-Centered Machine Learning
    Sperrle, F.
    El-Assady, M.
    Guo, G.
    Borgo, R.
    Chau, D. Horng
    Endert, A.
    Keim, D.
    [J]. COMPUTER GRAPHICS FORUM, 2021, 40 (03) : 543 - 567
  • [6] Review of Human-Centered Explainable AI in Healthcare
    Song, Shuchao
    Chen, Yiqiang
    Yu, Hanchao
    Zhang, Yingwei
    Yang, Xiaodong
    [J]. Jisuanji Fuzhu Sheji Yu Tuxingxue Xuebao/Journal of Computer-Aided Design and Computer Graphics, 2024, 36 (05): : 645 - 657
  • [7] Real-Life Guards for Human-Centered Systems
    Serbedzija, Nikola
    [J]. 10TH ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PERVASIVE TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO ASSISTIVE ENVIRONMENTS (PETRA 2017), 2017, : 234 - 235
  • [8] Human-Centered Design
    Flynn, Katherine
    [J]. ARCHITECT, 2020, 109 (02): : 49 - 49
  • [9] Human-Centered AI
    Marble, Jena
    [J]. DESIGN AND CULTURE, 2024,
  • [10] Human-Centered AI
    Taylor, Angelique
    [J]. ISSUES IN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 38 (04) : 93 - 95