The grammar of philosophical discourse

被引:0
|
作者
Krysztofiak, Wojciech [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland
关键词
Architectonic forms of philosophy; architectonic spaces; transformations of forms; logic of discourse; philosophical grammar;
D O I
10.1515/sem-2012-0020
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
In this paper, a formal theory is presented that describes syntactic and semantic mechanisms of philosophical discourses. They are treated as peculiar language systems possessing deep derivational structures called architectonic forms of philosophical systems, encoded in philosophical mind. Architectonic forms are constituents of more complex structures called architectonic spaces of philosophy. They are understood as formal and algorithmic representations of various philosophical traditions. The formal derivational machinery of a given space determines its class of all possible architectonic forms. Some of them stand under factual historical philosophical systems and they organize processes of doing philosophy within these systems. Many architectonic forms have never been realized in the history of philosophy. The presented theory may be interpreted as falling under Hegel's paradigm of comprehending cultural texts. This paradigm is enriched and inspired with Propp's formal, morphological view on texts. The peculiarity of this modification of the Hegel-Propp paradigm consists of the use of algebraic and algorithmic tools of modeling processes of cultural development. To speak metaphorically the theory is an attempt at the mathematical and logical history of philosophy inspired by the Internet metaphor. And that is why it belongs to the tradition of doing metaphilosophy in The Lvov-Warsaw School, which is continued today mainly by Wolenski, Pelc, Perzanowski, and Jadacki.
引用
收藏
页码:295 / 322
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Discourse, grammar, discourse
    Ariel, Mira
    [J]. DISCOURSE STUDIES, 2009, 11 (01) : 5 - 36
  • [2] The grammar of discourse
    Rolfe, L
    [J]. WORD-JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL LINGUISTIC ASSOCIATION, 1999, 50 (02): : 279 - 281
  • [3] The apology of the "philosophical grammar"
    Shokhin, V. K.
    [J]. EPISTEMOLOGY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-EPISTEMOLOGIYA I FILOSOFIYA NAUKI, 2010, 26 (04): : 80 - 83
  • [4] Philosophical discourse
    Samama, G
    [J]. ESPRIT, 1999, (05) : 243 - 246
  • [5] ''Philosophical discourse''
    Blanchot, M
    [J]. AUT AUT, 1996, (273-74): : 69 - 73
  • [6] Philosophical discourse
    Samama, G
    [J]. REVUE PHILOSOPHIQUE DE LA FRANCE ET DE L ETRANGER, 1999, 124 (03): : 395 - 396
  • [7] GRAMMAR AND CONTEXT IN FUNCTIONAL DISCOURSE GRAMMAR
    Hengeveld, Kees
    Lachlan Mackenzie, J.
    [J]. PRAGMATICS, 2014, 24 (02): : 203 - 227
  • [8] The idea of philosophical grammar: forms of grammar and coherent grammar concepts
    Prandi, Michele
    [J]. 1ER CONGRES MONDIAL DE LINGUISTIQUE FRANCAISE: CMLF 2008, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, : 1083 - 1091
  • [9] Discourse in cognitive grammar
    Langacker, RW
    [J]. COGNITIVE LINGUISTICS, 2001, 12 (02) : 143 - 188
  • [10] Grammar (morphosyntax) and discourse
    Tsunoda, Tasaku
    [J]. STUDIES IN LANGUAGE, 2023, 47 (04): : 830 - 869