Measurement of the radiological hip joint space width.: An evaluation of various methods of measurement

被引:51
|
作者
Conrozier, T
Lequesne, M
Favret, H
Taccoen, A
Mazières, B
Dougados, M
Vignon, M
Vignon, E [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Hosp Lyon Sud, Serv Rhumatol, F-69495 Pierre Benite, France
[2] Hop Leopold Bellan, Serv Rhumatol, Paris, France
[3] Ctr Hosp Lyon Sud, LEMA, F-69310 Pierre Benite, France
[4] Lab Negma, Toussus Noble, France
[5] CHU Rangueil, Serv Rhumatol, Toulouse, France
[6] Hop Cochin, Serv Rhumatol, F-75674 Paris, France
关键词
hip; osteoarthritis; radiology; joint space narrowing;
D O I
10.1053/joca.2000.0386
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To determine the most relevant method of measurement of the radiographic hip joint space width (JSW). Design: Seventy hips were examined from 36 patients of the ECHODIAH study having had one to four X-rays of the pelvis during the 3-year course of the study. Minimum interbone distance (MIDc), mean width of both the whole joint space (MJSWL) and a region of interest of the joint space (MJSWroi) were measured using computerized analysis of digitized radiographs. MID was also measured using a graduated eyepiece (MIDge). Reproducibility of the measurement was assessed by the intraclass coefficient of correlation. Sensitivity to change was evaluated by the standardized response mean. Results: The intraobserver intraclass coefficient of correlation of MIDc and MJSWroi was 0.98 and 0.94, respectively The mean value +/-S.D. of MJSWL, MJSWroi, MIDc and MIDge was 3.3 +/-0.9, 2.6 +/-0.9, 2.4 +/-0.9 and 2.6 +/-1.2 mm, respectively. MIDge was significantly larger than MIDc (mean difference: 0.21 +/-0.62 mm, P <0.001), in both normal and osteoarthritic hips. However, the difference between MIDge and MIDc Varied largely when considering topography of femoral head migration. Whatever the method was, a significant (P <0.001) mean decrease of nearly 0.5 mm was found in osteoarthritic hips over the 3 year follow-up. The standardized response mean for MJSWL, MJSWroi, MIDge and MIDc was 0.73, 0.75, 0.79 and 0.85, respectively. Superiority of MIDc, in term of sensitivity to change, was mainly seen in osteoarthritic hips showing a superomedial or a concentric migration of the femoral head. Conclusion: Minimum interbone distance measured with a computer assisted method is suggested as the most suitable method for the evaluation of hip osteoarthritis (OA) progression. (C) 2001 OsteoArthritis Research Society International.
引用
收藏
页码:281 / 286
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Measurement of the osteoarthritic hip joint space (JS']JS) width. An evaluation of various methods.
    Vignon, E
    Conrozier, T
    Lequesne, M
    Favret, H
    Taccoen, A
    [J]. ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2000, 43 (09): : S338 - S338
  • [2] Reliability of four methods for the measurement of joint space width in osteoarthritis of the hip.
    Hilliquin, P
    Cadet, C
    Conrozier, T
    Vignon, E
    Coste, J
    [J]. ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2002, 46 (09): : S150 - S151
  • [3] Automated measurement of radiographic hip joint-space width
    Gordon, CL
    Wu, C
    Peterfy, CG
    Li, J
    Duryea, J
    Klifa, C
    Genant, HK
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2001, 28 (02) : 267 - 277
  • [4] Measurement of joint space width in hip osteoarthritis: influence of joint positioning and radiographic procedure
    Auleley, GR
    Duche, A
    Drape, JL
    Dougados, M
    Ravaud, P
    [J]. RHEUMATOLOGY, 2001, 40 (04) : 414 - 419
  • [5] The highly accurate measurement method of length and width.
    Mennesson, M
    [J]. COMPTES RENDUS HEBDOMADAIRES DES SEANCES DE L ACADEMIE DES SCIENCES, 1932, 194 : 1459 - 1461
  • [6] MEASUREMENT OF RADIOLOGICAL JOINT WIDTH IS THE KEY IN ASSESSING HIP INVOLVEMENT OF HIPS IN ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS.
    Han, Q.
    Zheng, Z.
    Zhang, K.
    Yu, Z.
    Yang, F.
    Liang, Q.
    Zhu, P.
    Baraliakos, X.
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2020, 79 : 498 - 499
  • [7] Measurement of joint space width and erosion size
    Sharp, JI
    van der Heijde, D
    Angwin, J
    Duryea, J
    Moens, HJB
    Jacobs, JWG
    Maillefert, JF
    Strand, CV
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2005, 32 (12) : 2456 - 2461
  • [8] Automatic detection of the articular margins of the hip joint offers reproductive quantification of radiographic joint-space width.
    Gordon, CL
    Wu, CY
    Li, J
    Peterfy, C
    Genant, HK
    [J]. ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1999, 42 (09): : S381 - S381
  • [9] Evaluation of two methods assessing radiographic joint space width in hip osteoarthritis (OA).
    Maillefert, JF
    Sharp, JT
    Aho, JS
    Dougados, M
    [J]. ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2001, 44 (09): : S138 - S138
  • [10] Validity and responsiveness of radiographic joint space width metric measurement in hip osteoarthritis: a systematic review
    Lin, D. Chu Miow
    Reichmann, W. M.
    Gossec, L.
    Losina, E.
    Conaghan, P. G.
    Maillefert, J. F.
    [J]. OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2011, 19 (05) : 543 - 549