The reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Oxford Elbow Score

被引:5
|
作者
Yosmaoglu, Hayri Baran [2 ]
Dogan, Deha [1 ]
Sonmezer, Emel [2 ]
机构
[1] Ankara Univ, Fac Educ Sci, Dept Measurement & Evaluat, Ankara, Turkey
[2] Baskent Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Phys Therapy & Rehabil, Eskisehir Yolu 20, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
RATING SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1186/s13018-016-0429-3
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Objective measures of outcome ensure reliable decisions with regard to treatment planning. Oxford Elbow Score (OES) is one of the common outcome measures used for assessing quality of life of patients with elbow disorders. OES consists of three domains: pain, elbow function and social/psychological. The aim of this study is to test the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the OES. Methods: The study's sample includes 82 patients with elbow problems. The original version of the OES was translated into Turkish using the Isis Outcomes Translation and Linguistic Validation Process. The construct validity of the Turkish version of the OES was tested using a confirmatory factor analysis. For internal consistency, Cronbach's alpha was calculated. A Pearson correlation and a dependent sample t test were utilised for reproducibility of the OES. For convergent validity, the correlation coefficients were calculated between the domains of the OES and Short Form 36 (SF36). An independent sample t test was calculated to determine if there was a significant difference between the scores of the participants from the upper and lower groups. Results: Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) indicates that the three-factor structure of the OES was confirmed. Most of the fit indices are at the expected level, except for a root mean square error of approximation and an adjusted goodness of fit index. Cronbach's alpha was calculated as 0.91 for the whole scale. The results showed that there are positive and high correlations between the first and follow-up assessments (r = 0.89, p < 0.0001). The Turkish OES version and its dimensions have moderate and significant correlations with domains of SF36 in general. The test results indicated that the mean of each item on three domains of the OES was higher for the upper 27 %, and this difference was significant at the 0.01 level. Conclusions: The Turkish version of the OES is a reliable, valid, reproducible and practical tool. It can be used for patients with elbow disorders and is recommended for clinician use.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Oxford Elbow Score
    Hayri Baran Yosmaoglu
    Deha Doğan
    Emel Sonmezer
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 11
  • [2] The reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Dutch version of the Oxford elbow score
    Jeroen de Haan
    Harold Goei
    Niels WL Schep
    Wim E Tuinebreijer
    Peter Patka
    Dennis den Hartog
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 6
  • [3] The reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Dutch version of the Oxford elbow score
    de Haan, Jeroen
    Goei, Harold
    Schep, Niels W. L.
    Tuinebreijer, Wim E.
    Patka, Peter
    den Hartog, Dennis
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2011, 6
  • [4] The reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the oxford shoulder instability score
    Sonmezer, Emel
    Yosmaoglu, Hayri Baran
    Dogan, Celal Deha
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2020, 42 (02) : 261 - 266
  • [5] The Shanghai Elbow Dysfunction Score: Psychometric Properties, Reliability and Validity Study of the Turkish Version
    Birinci, Tansu
    Altun, Suleyman
    Ziroglu, Nezih
    Mutlu, Ebru Kaya
    EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2024, 47 (01) : 111 - 118
  • [6] Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of LHB Score
    Najafov, Elshan
    Ozal, Seyda
    Kaptan, Ahmet Yigit
    Ulucakoy, Coskun
    Kanatli, Ulunay
    Ataoglu, Baybars
    Basar, Selda
    JOURNAL OF SPORT REHABILITATION, 2021, 30 (01) : 30 - 36
  • [7] The Liverpool Elbow Score, patient-answered section: Cultural adaptation, validity and reliability of Turkish version
    Savkin, Raziye
    Buker, Nihal
    Simsek, Sule
    MUSCULOSKELETAL SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2020, 50
  • [8] Reliability and validity of Turkish version of the patient rated tennis elbow evaluation
    Lale Altan
    İlker Ercan
    Saniye Konur
    Rheumatology International, 2010, 30 : 1049 - 1054
  • [9] Reliability and validity of Turkish version of the patient rated tennis elbow evaluation
    Altan, Lale
    Ercan, Ilker
    Konur, Saniye
    RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 30 (08) : 1049 - 1054
  • [10] Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the neurogenic bladder symptom score
    Guler, Mehmet Akif
    Dogan, Deniz
    Yilmaz Yalcinkaya, Ebru
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2022, 44 (12) : 2889 - 2895