Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Paired With Verb Network Strengthening Treatment Improves Verb Naming in Primary Progressive Aphasia: A Case Series

被引:4
|
作者
Sheppard, Shannon M. [1 ,2 ]
Goldberg, Emily B. [2 ]
Sebastian, Rajani [2 ]
Walker, Alexandra [2 ]
Meier, Erin L. [2 ,3 ]
Hillis, Argye E. [2 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Chapman Univ, Dept Commun Sci & Disorders, Irvine, CA 92866 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Neurol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[3] Northeastern Univ, Dept Commun Sci & Disorders, Boston, MA USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[5] Johns Hopkins Univ, Krieger Sch Arts & Sci, Dept Cognit Sci, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
LANGUAGE; FLUENCY; CORTEX; MECHANISMS; GENERATION; THERAPY; DECLINE; PATIENT; ANOMIA; ROLES;
D O I
10.1044/2022_AJSLP-21-00272
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Purpose: There are few evidence-based treatments for language deficits in primary progressive aphasia (PPA). PPA treatments are often adopted from the poststroke aphasia literature. The poststroke aphasia literature has shown promising results using Verb Network Strengthening Treatment (VNeST), a behavioral therapy that focuses on improving naming by producing verbs and their arguments in phrases and sentences. Emerging research in poststroke aphasia and PPA has shown promising results pairing behavioral language therapy with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Method: This study used a double-blind, within-subjects, sham-controlled crossover design to study the effect of anodal tDCS applied to left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) plus VNeST versus VNeST plus sham stimulation in two individuals with nonfluent variant PPA and one individual with logopenic variant PPA. Participants received two phases of treatment, each with 15 1-hr sessions of VNeST. One phase paired VNeST with tDCS stimulation, and one with sham. For each phase, language testing was conducted at baseline, and at 1 week and 8 weeks posttreatment conclusion. For each participant, treatment efficacy was evaluated for each treatment phase by comparing the mean change in accuracy between baseline and the follow-up time points for naming trained verbs (primary outcome measure), untrained verbs, and nouns on the Object and Action Naming Battery. Mean change from baseline was also directly compared between tDCS and sham phases at each time point. Results: Results revealed a different pattern of outcomes for each of the participants. A tDCS advantage was not found for trained verbs for any participant. Two participants with nonfluent variant PPA had a tDCS advantage for generalization to naming of untrained verbs, which was apparent at 1 week and 8 weeks posttreatment. One participant with nonfluent variant also showed evidence of generalization to sentence production in the tDCS phase. Conclusion: VNeST plus anodal tDCS stimulation of left IFG shows promising results for improving naming in PPA.
引用
收藏
页码:1736 / 1754
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Transcranial Cerebellar Direct Current Stimulation Enhances Verb Generation but Not Verb Naming in Poststroke Aphasia
    Marangolo, Paola
    Fiori, Valentina
    Caltagirone, Carlo
    Pisano, Francesca
    Priori, Alberto
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2018, 30 (02) : 188 - 199
  • [2] Written Verb Naming Improves After tDCS Over the Left IFG in Primary Progressive Aphasia
    Fenner, Amberlynn S.
    Webster, Kimberly T.
    Ficek, Bronte N.
    Frangakis, Constantine E.
    Tsapkini, Kyrana
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 10
  • [3] Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Improves Verbal Fluency in Patients with Primary Progressive Aphasia
    Hosseini, Mahdieh
    McConathey, Eric M.
    Ungrady, Molly
    Grossman, Murray
    Coslett, H. Branch
    Hamilton, Roy
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 2019, 92 (15)
  • [4] Verb Frequency and Density Drive Naming Performance in Primary Progressive Aphasia
    Stockbridge, Melissa D.
    Venezia, Jonathan H.
    Vitti, Emilia
    Tippett, Donna C.
    Hillis, Argye E.
    [J]. APHASIOLOGY, 2023, 37 (12) : 1964 - 1980
  • [5] Meta-Analysis on the Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Naming of Elderly with Primary Progressive Aphasia
    Byeon, Haewon
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (03)
  • [6] Exploring the effects of verb and noun treatment on verb phrase production in primary progressive aphasia: A series of single case experimental design studies
    Taylor-Rubin, Cathleen
    Nickels, Lyndsey
    Croot, Karen
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL REHABILITATION, 2022, 32 (06) : 1121 - 1163
  • [7] Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation as an Adjunct to Verb Network Strengthening Treatment in Post-stroke Chronic Aphasia: A Double-Blinded Randomized Feasibility Study
    Matar, Shereen J.
    Newton, Caroline
    Sorinola, Isaac O.
    Pavlou, Marousa
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [8] Treatment Methods of Language and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Naming Impairment Resulted from the Primary Progressive Aphasia: A Systematic Review
    Farhadi, Neda
    Yousefzade, Fahime
    Rahimi, Alireza
    Ghasisin, Leila
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2024, 11 (03)
  • [9] Improved naming after transcranial direct current stimulation in aphasia
    Monti, A.
    Cogiamanian, F.
    Marceglia, S.
    Ferrucci, R.
    Mameli, F.
    Mrakic-Sposta, S.
    Vergari, M.
    Zago, S.
    Priori, A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2008, 79 (04): : 451 - 453
  • [10] The effect of computerised Verb Network Strengthening Treatment on lexical retrieval in aphasia
    Furnas, Daniel W.
    Edmonds, Lisa A.
    [J]. APHASIOLOGY, 2014, 28 (04) : 401 - 420