Linking animal movement and remote sensing - mapping resource suitability from a remote sensing perspective

被引:20
|
作者
Remelgado, Ruben [1 ]
Leutner, Benjamin [1 ]
Safi, Kamran [2 ]
Sonnenschein, Ruth [3 ]
Kuebert, Carina [1 ]
Wegmann, Martin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wurzburg, Inst Geog & Geol, Wurzburg, Bayern, Germany
[2] Max Planck Inst Ornithol, Radolfzell am Bodensee, Baden Wurttembe, Germany
[3] European Acad Bolzano EURAC, Inst Earth Observat, Bolzano, South Tyrol, Italy
关键词
Landsat; movement ecology; optical remote sensing; resource mapping; resource suitability; surface reflectances; SENSOR SPATIAL-RESOLUTION; SELECTION; CLASSIFICATION; PHENOLOGY; IMAGERY; PLUS; AUTOCORRELATION; REQUIREMENTS; DEPENDENCE; ABSENCES;
D O I
10.1002/rse2.70
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Optical remote sensing is an important tool in the study of animal behavior providing ecologists with the means to understand species-environment interactions in combination with animal movement data. However, differences in spatial and temporal resolution between movement and remote sensing data limit their direct assimilation. In this context, we built a data-driven framework to map resource suitability that addresses these differences as well as the limitations of satellite imagery. It combines seasonal composites of multiyear surface reflectances and optimized presence and absence samples acquired with animal movement data within a cross-validation modeling scheme. Moreover, it responds to dynamic, site-specific environmental conditions making it applicable to contrasting landscapes. We tested this framework using five populations of White Storks (Ciconia ciconia) to model resource suitability related to foraging achieving accuracies from 0.40 to 0.94 for presences and 0.66 to 0.93 for absences. These results were influenced by the temporal composition of the seasonal reflectances indicated by the lower accuracies associated with higher day differences in relation to the target dates. Additionally, population differences in resource selection influenced our results marked by the negative relationship between the model accuracies and the variability of the surface reflectances associated with the presence samples. Our modeling approach spatially splits presences between training and validation. As a result, when these represent different and unique resources, we face a negative bias during validation. Despite these inaccuracies, our framework offers an important basis to analyze species-environment interactions. As it standardizes site-dependent behavioral and environmental characteristics, it can be used in the comparison of intra- and interspecies environmental requirements and improves the analysis of resource selection along migratory paths. Moreover, due to its sensitivity to differences in resource selection, our approach can contribute toward a better understanding of species requirements.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 224
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Bridging disciplines with training in remote sensing for animal movement: an attendee perspective
    Clark, Bethany L.
    Bevanda, Mirjana
    Aspillaga, Eneko
    Jorgensen, Nicolai H.
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING IN ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2017, 3 (01) : 30 - 37
  • [2] Remote sensing and the rancher: Linking rancher perception and remote sensing
    Rowley, Rex J.
    Price, Kevin P.
    Kastens, Jude H.
    [J]. RANGELAND ECOLOGY & MANAGEMENT, 2007, 60 (04) : 359 - 368
  • [3] Remote Sensing of Ecology, Biodiversity and Conservation: A Review from the Perspective of Remote Sensing Specialists
    Wang, Kai
    Franklin, Steven E.
    Guo, Xulin
    Cattet, Marc
    [J]. SENSORS, 2010, 10 (11) : 9647 - 9667
  • [4] Suitability of spectral remote sensing for coral reef surveying, monitoring and mapping
    Gomez, R
    Kafatos, M
    Lewis, A
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING, GIS APPLICATIONS, AND GEOLOGY II, 2003, 4886 : 363 - 374
  • [5] Soil Resource Assessment and Mapping using Remote Sensing and GIS
    Velmurugan, A.
    Carlos, Guillen G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE INDIAN SOCIETY OF REMOTE SENSING, 2009, 37 (03) : 511 - 525
  • [6] Soil resource assessment and mapping using remote sensing and GIS
    A. Velmurugan
    Guillen G. Carlos
    [J]. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 2009, 37 : 511 - 525
  • [7] Application of remote sensing and GIS in mineral resource mapping - An overview
    Rajesh, HM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MINERALOGICAL AND PETROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2004, 99 (03) : 83 - 103
  • [8] Soil resource mapping for precision farming using remote sensing
    Selige, T
    Schmidhalter, U
    [J]. IGARSS 2001: SCANNING THE PRESENT AND RESOLVING THE FUTURE, VOLS 1-7, PROCEEDINGS, 2001, : 3138 - 3140
  • [9] Epikarst mapping by remote sensing
    Pardo-Iguzquiza, Eulogio
    Dowd, Peter A.
    Ruiz-Constan, Ana
    Martos-Rosillo, Sergio
    Luque-Espinar, Juan A.
    Rodriguez-Galiano, Victor
    Pedrera, Antonio
    [J]. CATENA, 2018, 165 : 1 - 11
  • [10] Remote sensing in geological mapping
    Gubin, V
    [J]. CURRENT ROLE OF GEOLOGICAL MAPPING IN GEOSCIENCES, 2005, 56 : 151 - 156