Assessing psychological resilience: translation and validation of the Chinese version of the resilience evaluation scale (RES)

被引:5
|
作者
Qing, Yulan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Bakker, Anne [1 ,2 ,4 ]
van der Meer, Christianne A., I [5 ]
te Brake, Hans [6 ]
Olff, Miranda [1 ,2 ,3 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Amsterdam UMC Locat Univ Amsterdam, Dept Psychiat, Meibergdreef 9, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Amsterdam Publ Hlth Res Inst, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Amsterdam Neurosci Res Inst, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] OLVG, Dept Trauma Care, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Fdn Ctr 45, Arq Psychotrauma Expert Grp, Oegstgeest, Netherlands
[6] ARQ Ctr Excellence Impact, ARQ Natl Psychotrauma Ctr, Diemen, Netherlands
[7] ARQ Natl Psychotrauma Ctr, Diemen, Netherlands
关键词
Resilience evaluation scale (RES); psychological resilience; psychometric properties; Chinese; potentially traumatic event (PTE); RESOURCES; ADAPTATION; STRATEGIES; MODEL; SENSE;
D O I
10.1080/20008066.2022.2133358
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Background The Resilience Evaluation Scale (RES) is a novel and freely available measure of psychological resilience (factored into self-confidence and self-efficacy). To date, psychometric properties were evaluated in Dutch and American samples, but not yet in a Chinese sample. Objective We aimed to validate the RES in a Chinese sample by examining its factor structure, reliability, and construct validity. Methods The RES was translated into Chinese following a cross-cultural translation and adaptation procedure. Self-report questionnaires including the RES, exposure to potentially traumatic events (PTE's), the PTSD checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5), and scales for conceptually related constructs of psychological resilience were then administered via an online survey. Results In total, 484 Chinese adults (females, 66.9%; age: 27.33 +/- 6.86 years) participated. Parallel analysis results suggested a one-factor structure for the Chinese RES. The Chinese RES demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.88). Construct validity was demonstrated through significant associations with hypothesised related constructs and through a relation with lower levels of PTSD among the PTE-exposed subsample (n = 116) via the mediating role of avoidant coping strategies, i.e. behavioural disengagement and self-blame. Conclusion Our results suggest that the RES is a reliable and valid assessment of psychological resilience to use in Chinese, in addition to its Dutch and English versions. The RES could potentially be adopted to measure psychological resilience in cross-cultural contexts.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessing Psychological Resilience: Development and Psychometric Properties of the English and Dutch Version of the Resilience Evaluation Scale (RES)
    van der Meer, Christianne A. I.
    te Brake, Hans
    van der Aa, Niels
    Dashtgard, Pasha
    Bakker, Anne
    Olff, Miranda
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 9
  • [2] Translation and validation of Persian version of resilience evaluation scale (RES): A cross-cultural methodological research
    Aghababaeian, Hamidreza
    Ostadtaghizadeh, Abbas
    Zareian, Armin
    Olff, Miranda
    van der Meer, Christianne
    Araghi Ahvazi, Ladan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATION AND HEALTH PROMOTION, 2024, 13 (01)
  • [3] Translation and psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the resilience scale for children with cancer
    Joyce Oi Kwan Chung
    William Ho Cheung Li
    Xia Wei
    Ankie Tan Cheung
    Laurie Long Kwan Ho
    Godfrey Chi-Fung Chan
    [J]. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 19
  • [4] Translation and psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the resilience scale for children with cancer
    Chung, Joyce Oi Kwan
    Li, William Ho Cheung
    Wei, Xia
    Cheung, Ankie Tan
    Ho, Laurie Long Kwan
    Chan, Godfrey Chi-Fung
    [J]. HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2021, 19 (01)
  • [5] Validation of the Chinese version of the resilience scale for the oldest-old
    Wang, Ning
    Chen, Hongyu
    Zhang, Minyi
    Wang, Yuanyuan
    Xue, Zhihan
    Hao, Xixi
    Liu, Yan
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [6] Validation of the Chinese version of the Resilience Scale and its cutoff score for detecting low resilience in Chinese cancer patients
    Tian, Jun
    Hong, Jin Sheng
    [J]. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2013, 21 (05) : 1497 - 1502
  • [7] Validation of the Chinese version of the Resilience Scale and its cutoff score for detecting low resilience in Chinese cancer patients
    Jun Tian
    Jin Sheng Hong
    [J]. Supportive Care in Cancer, 2013, 21 : 1497 - 1502
  • [8] Psychometric Evaluation of The Chinese Version of The Resilience Scale for Children with Cancer
    Chung, O. K. J.
    Li, W. H. C.
    [J]. PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2021, 68 : S28 - S29
  • [9] Translation and population-based validation of the Arabic version of the brief resilience scale
    Baattaiah, Baian A.
    Alharbi, Mutasim D.
    Khan, Fayaz
    Aldhahi, Monira I.
    [J]. ANNALS OF MEDICINE, 2023, 55 (01)
  • [10] Resilience in Physicians: Contributions to the Validation of the European Portuguese Version of the Resilience Scale
    Serrao, Carla
    Castro, Luisa
    Teixeira, Andreia
    Rodrigues, Ana Rita
    Duarte, Ivone
    [J]. ACTA MEDICA PORTUGUESA, 2021, 34 (7-8) : 523 - 532