Ionospheric TEC variation over Manama, Bahrain and comparison with NeQuick-2 model

被引:5
|
作者
Sharma, Sunil Kumar [1 ]
机构
[1] Majmaah Univ, Coll Comp & Informat Sci, Majmaah 11952, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Manama; IGS; GNSS; NeQuick; VTEC; TECU;
D O I
10.1007/s10509-019-3503-6
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
This paper presents the ionospheric total electron content (TEC) variation over Manama city of Bahrain using GNSS observables from International GNSS Services (IGS) station at Manama, Bahrain during the period from January 2016 to December 2017. To understand the behavior of TEC variability, the diurnal, monthly and seasonal vertical TEC (VTEC) variations are studied and subsequently compared with NeQuick-2 model estimations. Diurnal VTEC variation reveals a diurnal peak level of about 14 TECU around 09.00UT and declines thereafter to reach a level of about 5 TECU around 20.00UT. However, the comparison study confirms the NeQuick-2 model overestimating the GNSS-VTEC irrespective of time of observation during the day. Monthly behavior of VTEC variation reflects that the NeQuick model is well estimated with GNSS-VTEC during November 2016 and January, February and October months in 2017. The magnitude of variations depicts about 30 to 35 TECU (the highest values) during September 2017 and three continuous months February to April in 2016, while it shows about 10 TECU (the lowest value) during January and December months of 2017, November and December months of 2016. Seasonal VTEC variation shows the underestimation of NeQuick-2 model during the June solstice for the years 2016 and 2017, about 10 TECU. It is notable that NeQuick model shows almost good agreement during the March equinox and December solstice in spite of departure in magnitude difference.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ionospheric TEC variation over Manama, Bahrain and comparison with NeQuick-2 model
    Sunil Kumar Sharma
    Astrophysics and Space Science, 2019, 364
  • [2] Analysis of Ionospheric TEC Variation over Manama, Bahrain, and Comparison with IRI-2012 and IRI-2016 Models
    Sunil Kumar Sharma
    Kutubuddin Ansari
    Sampad Kumar Panda
    Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 2018, 43 : 3823 - 3830
  • [3] Analysis of Ionospheric TEC Variation over Manama, Bahrain, and Comparison with IRI-2012 and IRI-2016 Models
    Sharma, Sunil Kumar
    Ansari, Kutubuddin
    Panda, Sampad Kumar
    ARABIAN JOURNAL FOR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2018, 43 (07) : 3823 - 3830
  • [4] Comparison of Ionospheric Total Electron Content (TEC) over Sonmiani (Pakistan) with NeQuick-2 and IRI-2012 during July 2014-June 2015
    Ameen, Muhammmad Ayyaz
    Jabbar, Mehak Abdul
    Yu, Xiao
    Zhen, Weimin
    Murtaza, Ghulam
    Chishtie, Farrukh
    Khursheed, Haqqa
    Atiq, Muhammad
    ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, 2019, 63 (06) : 1882 - 1891
  • [5] A method to ingest GPS-TEC into the NeQuick ionospheric model
    Brunini, C.
    Gularte, E.
    Meza, A.
    Radicella, S. M.
    Nava, B.
    Coisson, P.
    Mosert, M.
    RADIO SCIENCE, 2007, 42 (04)
  • [6] An improved NeQuick-G global ionospheric TEC model with a machine learning approach
    K. Sivakrishna
    D. Venkata Ratnam
    Gampala Sivavaraprasad
    GPS Solutions, 2023, 27
  • [7] A study of vTEC above Nepal exploring different calibration techniques, including a comparison with the NeQuick-2 model
    P. Poudel
    A. Silwal
    B. D. Ghimire
    S. P. Gautam
    M. Karki
    N. P. Chapagain
    B. Adhikari
    D. Pandit
    C. Amory-Mazaudier
    Astrophysics and Space Science, 2022, 367
  • [8] Comparisons of the Variation of the Ionospheric TEC with NmF2 over China
    Liu, Rui-Yuan
    Wu, Ye-Wen
    Zhang, Bei-Chen
    2014 XXXITH URSI GENERAL ASSEMBLY AND SCIENTIFIC SYMPOSIUM (URSI GASS), 2014,
  • [9] An improved NeQuick-G global ionospheric TEC model with a machine learning approach
    Sivakrishna, K.
    Ratnam, D. Venkata
    Sivavaraprasad, Gampala
    GPS SOLUTIONS, 2023, 27 (02)
  • [10] An examination of the Galileo NeQuick model: comparison with GPS and JASON TEC
    Ningbo Wang
    Yunbin Yuan
    Zishen Li
    Ying Li
    Xingliang Huo
    Min Li
    GPS Solutions, 2017, 21 : 605 - 615