Orthogonal Uncertainty Modeling in the Engineering of Cyber-Physical Systems

被引:15
|
作者
Bandyszak, Torsten [1 ]
Daun, Marian [1 ]
Tenbergen, Bastian [2 ]
Kuhs, Patrick [1 ]
Wolf, Stefanie [3 ]
Weyer, Thorsten [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Duisburg Essen, Paluno, D-45127 Essen, Germany
[2] SUNY Coll Oswego, Dept Comp Sci, Oswego, NY 13126 USA
[3] Siemens AG, Corp Technol, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany
[4] Univ Koblenz Landau, Inst Software Technol, D-56070 Koblenz, Germany
关键词
Uncertainty; Robot sensing systems; Context modeling; Collaboration; Production; Runtime; Cyber-physical systems; industry automation case study; model-based engineering; orthogonal modeling; uncertainty; uncertainty modeling; MULTIPLE MOBILE ROBOTS; INDUSTRY; 4.0; REPRESENTATION; TRANSPORT; FRAMEWORK; CONFLICT;
D O I
10.1109/TASE.2020.2980726
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Software-intensive cyber-physical systems (CPS) perform essential tasks such as controlling automated production processes in industrial production plants. The required levels of autonomy, openness, and self-adaptation, as well as the dynamic nature of the context of such CPS, result in challenging tasks for their engineering. During operation, unexpected situations in which the system has insufficient knowledge about the current state of the system itself as well as its context may occur. Engineering CPS, e.g., for industrial production sites, must account for such uncertainties the system will have to cope with during its lifetime in a structured and systematic way. Since the development of CPS requires consideration of different system perspectives, current uncertainty modeling approaches cannot be applied right away, as they do not explicitly consider uncertainty aspects that affect different artifacts. To aid the engineering of CPS, this article presents a model-based approach to document uncertainty. We propose "Orthogonal Uncertainty Models," which closely integrate with other engineering artifacts from different perspectives, as a means for capturing a dedicated uncertainty viewpoint. Our approach has been evaluated in the industry automation domain. The application shows that the idea of regarding uncertainty within a dedicated perspective is highly beneficial. Particularly, our approach helps to uncover and document uncertainties related to behavioral, functional, and structural properties of a system, as well as uncertainties related to business models that would otherwise possibly remain covert. Note to Practitioners-Identifying and documenting uncertainties, which may occur during operation of a system, is a common problem in engineering processes. Such uncertainties may lead to severe damage, and thus need to be mitigated appropriately. It is crucial to account for these uncertainties during engineering, especially in the early phases. Depending on the specific project characteristics, a multitude of different diagram types are used to model a system. Uncertainties thus reflect in many artifacts, which leads to: 1) redundancies in the specified uncertainty attached to diagram elements and 2) uncertainty information (e.g., about the cause or effect of uncertainty) that is spread across different diagrams. The latter makes it difficult to structure uncertainty information and trace it throughout the engineering process so that uncertainty can be systematically considered. Our approach provides a graphical modeling language that employs a dedicated perspective on uncertainty in separate diagrams that can be linked to any engineering artifact.
引用
收藏
页码:1250 / 1265
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Modeling and Verification of Cyber-Physical Systems under uncertainty
    Geng, Shengling
    Peng, Jiao
    Li, Ping
    [J]. 2017 13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NATURAL COMPUTATION, FUZZY SYSTEMS AND KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY (ICNC-FSKD), 2017,
  • [2] Toward Modeling and Verification of Uncertainty in Cyber-Physical Systems
    Chatterjee, Amrita
    Reza, Hassan
    [J]. 2020 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRO INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (EIT), 2020, : 568 - 576
  • [3] Uncertainty Modeling and Quantitative Evaluation of Cyber-physical Systems
    Yang, Chenchen
    Sun, Haiying
    Liu, Jing
    Kang, Jiexiang
    Yin, Wei
    Wang, Hui
    Li, Tengfei
    [J]. 2021 IEEE 45TH ANNUAL COMPUTERS, SOFTWARE, AND APPLICATIONS CONFERENCE (COMPSAC 2021), 2021, : 874 - 883
  • [4] Engineering with cyber-physical systems - From mechatronic to cyber-physical engineering
    Scheifele, Stefan
    Verl, Alexander
    Riedel, Oliver
    [J]. ATP MAGAZINE, 2018, (11-12): : 68 - 78
  • [5] Engineering Cyber-Physical Systems
    Gruhn, Volker
    Gries, Stefan
    Hesenius, Marc
    Ollesch, Julius
    Ur Rehman, Shafiq
    Schwenzfeier, Nils
    Wahl, Christian
    Wessling, Florian
    [J]. NEW TRENDS IN INTELLIGENT SOFTWARE METHODOLOGIES, TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES, 2017, 297 : 3 - 18
  • [6] Modeling Cyber-Physical Systems
    Derler, Patricia
    Lee, Edward A.
    Vincentelli, Alberto Sangiovanni
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, 2012, 100 (01) : 13 - 28
  • [7] Toward Requirements Engineering of Cyber-Physical Systems: Modeling CubeSat
    Reza, Hassan
    Straub, Jeremy
    Alexander, Nicholas
    Korvald, Christoffer
    Hubber, Justin
    Chawla, Abhinav
    [J]. 2016 IEEE AEROSPACE CONFERENCE, 2016,
  • [8] Challenges in Engineering Cyber-Physical Systems
    Broy, Manfred
    Schmidt, Albrecht
    [J]. COMPUTER, 2014, 47 (02) : 70 - 72
  • [9] Engineering Resilient Cyber-Physical Systems
    Overbye, Thomas J.
    [J]. 2012 IEEE POWER AND ENERGY SOCIETY GENERAL MEETING, 2012,
  • [10] Threat modeling in cyber-physical systems
    Fernandez, Eduardo B.
    [J]. 2016 IEEE 14TH INTL CONF ON DEPENDABLE, AUTONOMIC AND SECURE COMPUTING, 14TH INTL CONF ON PERVASIVE INTELLIGENCE AND COMPUTING, 2ND INTL CONF ON BIG DATA INTELLIGENCE AND COMPUTING AND CYBER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY CONGRESS (DASC/PICOM/DATACOM/CYBERSC, 2016, : 448 - 453