Corporate tax laws, corporate restructuring, and subsidiarization of corporate form, 1981-1995

被引:9
|
作者
Zey, M [1 ]
Swenson, T [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Strateg Policies Res Grp, College Stn, TX 77840 USA
来源
SOCIOLOGICAL QUARTERLY | 1998年 / 39卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1533-8525.1998.tb00518.x
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
Between 1981 and 1995 the dominant form of Fortune 500 firms changed from the multidivisional farm to the multisubsidiary form (Zey and Camp 1996). The explanation for the movement toward subsidiarization originates in changes during the late 1970s and 1980s in the political economy, the relationship between corporations and capital, and the regulation of corporations. As a result of the declining capital accumulation of the 1970s, the federal government instituted two measures of corporate welfare, the Tax Reform Act of 1986 (TRA86) and the Revenue Act of 1987 (RA87), that provided corporations with nontaxable ways to restructure their acquisitions and divisions as subsidiaries. Thus, by the process of subsidiarization, corporations were able to continue capital flows. We examine the increase in subsidiarization from 1981-1995 as a means of assessing the utility of four theoretical perspectives to explain change in corporate form. A one-way random effects panel analysis demonstrates how corporate financial conditions, national business laws, and organizational characteristics combine to affect the rate of subsidiarization of U.S. corporations. Separate panel models for 1981-1985 (pre-TRA86) and 1986-1995 (post-TRA86) reveal that changes in corporate tax laws affect capital accumulation and result in significant change in corporate form. This analysis supports the structural political economy contingency theory arguing that change in capital accumulation, brought about by macro changes in political legal conditions of corporations, leads to the transformation of corporate form.
引用
收藏
页码:555 / 581
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Corporate Restructuring Laws Under Stress
    van Zwieten, Kristin
    Eidenmueller, Horst
    Sussman, Oren
    [J]. EUROPEAN BUSINESS ORGANIZATION LAW REVIEW, 2023, 24 (02) : 201 - 205
  • [2] Corporate Restructuring Laws Under Stress
    Kristin van Zwieten
    Horst Eidenmueller
    Oren Sussman
    [J]. European Business Organization Law Review, 2023, 24 : 201 - 205
  • [3] Corporate tax planning and corporate tax disclosure
    Mgammal, Mahfoudh Hussein
    [J]. MEDITARI ACCOUNTANCY RESEARCH, 2019, 28 (02) : 327 - 364
  • [4] Corporate restructuring
    Joh, SW
    [J]. KOREAN ECONOMY BEYOND THE CRISIS, 2004, : 194 - 217
  • [5] CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING
    RYBCZYNSKI, T
    [J]. NATIONAL WESTMINSTER BANK QUARTERLY REVIEW, 1989, : 18 - 28
  • [6] TAX CONSEQUENCES OF SHEDDING THE CORPORATE FORM
    Miller, Merle H.
    [J]. TEXAS LAW REVIEW, 1953, 31 (04) : 357 - 372
  • [7] Is Corporate Tax Aggressiveness a Reputation Threat? Corporate Accountability, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Corporate Tax Behavior
    Lisa Baudot
    Joseph A. Johnson
    Anna Roberts
    Robin W. Roberts
    [J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2020, 163 : 197 - 215
  • [8] Is Corporate Tax Aggressiveness a Reputation Threat? Corporate Accountability, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Corporate Tax Behavior
    Baudot, Lisa
    Johnson, Joseph A.
    Roberts, Anna
    Roberts, Robin W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2020, 163 (02) : 197 - 215
  • [9] FEDERAL TAX LAWS AND CORPORATE DIVIDEND BEHAVIOR
    BRITTAIN, JA
    [J]. OHIO STATE LAW JOURNAL, 1967, 28 (03) : 427 - 439
  • [10] HOW THE TAX LAWS ENCOURAGE CORPORATE ACQUISITIONS
    BERMAN, DS
    COOPER, BS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTANCY, 1963, 116 (05): : 61 - 64