Evaluation of two HbA1c point-of-care analyzers

被引:25
|
作者
Sanchez-Mora, Catalina [1 ]
Rodriguez-Oliva, Manuel S. [1 ]
Fernandez-Riejos, Patricia [1 ]
Mateo, Joaquin [1 ]
Polo-Padillo, Juan [2 ]
Goberna, Raimundo [1 ]
Sanchez-Margalet, Victor [1 ]
机构
[1] Virgen Macarena Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Biochem, Seville 41071, Spain
[2] Univ Seville, Biostat Unit, Dept Prevent Med & Publ Hlth, Virgen Macarena Univ Hosp, Seville, Spain
关键词
diabetes; evaluation; HbA1c; interference; point-of-care testing; IFCC REFERENCE METHOD; CARBAMYLATED HEMOGLOBIN; AFFINITY-CHROMATOGRAPHY; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; HBA(1C); GLYCOHEMOGLOBIN; HPLC; ELECTROPHORESIS; AVAILABILITY; ASSAYS;
D O I
10.1515/CCLM.2011.101
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Measurement of HbA1c is the most important parameter to assess glycemic control in diabetic patients. Different point-of-care devices for HbA1c are available. The aim of this study was to evaluate two point-of-care testing (POCT) analyzers (DCA Vantage from Siemens and Afinion from Axis-Shield). We studied the bias and precision as well as interference from carbamylated hemoglobin. Methods: Bias of the POCT analyzers was obtained by measuring 53 blood samples from diabetic patients with a wide range of HbA1c, 4%-14% (20-130 mmol/mol), and comparing the results with those obtained by the laboratory method: HPLC HA 8160 (R) Menarini. Precision was performed by 20 successive determinations of two samples with low 4.2% (22 mmol/mol) and high 9.5% (80 mmol/mol) HbA1c values. The possible interference from carbamylated hemoglobin was studied using 25 samples from patients with chronic renal failure. Results: The means of the differences between measurements performed by each POCT analyzer and the laboratory method (95% confidence interval) were: 0.28% (p < 0.005) (0.10-0.44) for DCA and 0.27% (p < 0.001) (0.19-0.35) for Afinion. Correlation coefficients were: r=0.973 for DCA, and r=0.991 for Afinion. The mean bias observed by using samples from chronic renal failure patients were 0.2 (range -0.4, 0.4) for DCA and 0.2 (-0.2, 0.5) for Afinion. Imprecision results were: CV=3.1% (high HbA1c) and 2.97% (low HbA1c) for DCA, CV=1.95% (high HbA1c) and 2.66% (low HbA1c) for Afinion. Conclusions: Both POCT analyzers for HbA1c show good correlation with the laboratory method and acceptable precision.
引用
收藏
页码:653 / 657
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of a HbA1c point-of-care analyzer
    Menendez-Valladares, Paloma
    Fernandez-Riejos, Patricia
    Sanchez-Mora, Catalina
    Perez-Perez, Antonio
    Sanchez-Margalet, Victor
    Gonzalez-Rodriguez, Concepcion
    [J]. CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2015, 48 (10-11) : 686 - 689
  • [2] Trends in Quantification of HbA1c Using Electrochemical and Point-of-Care Analyzers
    Mandali, Pavan Kumar
    Prabakaran, Amrish
    Annadurai, Kasthuri
    Krishnan, Uma Maheswari
    [J]. SENSORS, 2023, 23 (04)
  • [3] Different strategies for detection of HbA1c emphasizing on biosensors and point-of-care analyzers
    Kaur, Jagjit
    Jiang, Cheng
    Liu, Guozhen
    [J]. BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS, 2019, 123 : 85 - 100
  • [4] Analysis of a Point-of-Care HbA1c Assay: Is It Time for an HbA1c Error Grid?
    Krouwer, Jan S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DIABETES SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 14 (05): : 896 - 897
  • [5] Accuracy and Precision of a Point-of-Care HbA1c Test
    Arnold, William D.
    Kupfer, Kenneth
    Little, Randie R.
    Amar, Meera
    Horowitz, Barry
    Godbole, Narendra
    Swensen, Monica Hvidsten
    Li, Yin
    San George, Richard C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DIABETES SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 14 (05): : 883 - 889
  • [6] HbA1c-testing: Evaluation of two point-of-care analysers
    Dubach, Irina L.
    Christ, Emanuel R.
    Diem, Peter
    [J]. PRIMARY CARE DIABETES, 2019, 13 (06) : 583 - 587
  • [7] Accuracy of point-of-care HbA1c testing in pregnant women
    Culliney, Katherine
    McCowan, Lesley M. E.
    Okesene-Gafa, Karaponi
    Murphy, Rinki
    Rowan, Janet
    Taylor, Rennae S.
    Mckinlay, Christopher J. D.
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2018, 58 (06): : 643 - 647
  • [8] An Evaluation of Point-of-Care HbA1c, HbA1c Home Kits, and Glucose Management Indicator: Potential Solutions for Telehealth Glycemic Assessments
    Zaharieva, Dessi P.
    Addala, Ananta
    Prahalad, Priya
    Leverenz, Brianna
    Arrizon-Ruiz, Nora
    Ding, Victoria Y.
    Desai, Manisha
    Karger, Amy B.
    Maahs, David M.
    [J]. DIABETOLOGY, 2022, 3 (03): : 494 - 501
  • [9] Performance evaluation of SD A1cCare as a HbA1c analyzer for point-of-care testing
    Lee, Kyunghoon
    Jun, Sun-Hee
    Han, Minje
    Song, Sang Hoon
    Park, Kyoung Un
    Song, Woon Heung
    Song, Junghan
    [J]. CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2015, 48 (09) : 625 - 627
  • [10] VARIATION IN POINT-OF-CARE TESTING OF HBA1C IN DIABETES CARE IN GENERAL PRACTICE
    Kristensen, T.
    [J]. DIABETES TECHNOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2016, 18 : A64 - A64