Point Cloud Rendering After Coding: Impacts on Subjective and Objective Quality

被引:39
|
作者
Javaheri, Alireza [1 ,2 ]
Brites, Catarina [1 ,2 ]
Pereira, Fernando [1 ,2 ]
Ascenso, Joao [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Inst Super Tecn, P-1049001 Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Inst Telecomunicacoes, P-1049001 Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
Three-dimensional displays; Encoding; Rendering (computer graphics); Measurement; Geometry; Quality assessment; Codecs; Point cloud coding; quality assessment; subjective quality assessment; rendering; REPRESENTATION; COMPRESSION; SHAPE;
D O I
10.1109/TMM.2020.3037481
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Recently, point clouds have shown to be a promising way to represent 3D visual data for a wide range of immersive applications, from augmented reality to autonomous cars. Emerging imaging sensors have made easier to perform richer and denser point cloud acquisition, notably with millions of points, thus raising the need for efficient point cloud coding solutions. In such scenario, it is important to evaluate the impact and performance of several processing steps in a point cloud communication system, notably the degradations associated to point cloud coding solutions. Moreover, since point clouds are not directly visualized but rather processed with a rendering algorithm before shown on any display, the perceived quality of point cloud data highly depends on the rendering solution. In this context, the main objective of this paper is to study the impact of several coding and rendering solutions on the perceived user quality and in the performance of available objective assessment metrics. Another contribution regards the assessment of recent MPEG point cloud coding solutions for several popular rendering methods, which was never presented before. The conclusions regard the visibility of three types of coding artifacts for the three considered rendering approaches as well as the strengths and weaknesses of objective metrics when point clouds are rendered after coding.
引用
收藏
页码:4049 / 4064
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] On Subjective and Objective Quality Evaluation of Point Cloud Geometry
    Alexiou, Evangelos
    Ebrahimi, Touradj
    [J]. 2017 NINTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON QUALITY OF MULTIMEDIA EXPERIENCE (QOMEX), 2017,
  • [2] Influence of Spatial Rendering on the Performance of Point Cloud Objective Quality Metrics
    Lazzarotto, Davi
    Testolina, Michela
    Ebrahimi, Touradj
    [J]. 2022 10TH EUROPEAN WORKSHOP ON VISUAL INFORMATION PROCESSING (EUVIP), 2022,
  • [3] Point Cloud Coding Solutions, Subjective Assessment and Objective Measures: A Case Study
    Dumic, Emil
    da Silva Cruz, Luis A.
    [J]. SYMMETRY-BASEL, 2020, 12 (12): : 1 - 22
  • [4] Assessing objective quality metrics for JPEG and MPEG point cloud coding
    Lazzarotto, Davi
    Testolina, Michela
    Ebrahimi, Touradj
    [J]. 2024 16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON QUALITY OF MULTIMEDIA EXPERIENCE, QOMEX 2024, 2024, : 8 - 14
  • [5] SUBJECTIVE AND OBJECTIVE QUALITY EVALUATION OF 3D POINT CLOUD DENOISING ALGORITHMS
    Javaheri, Alireza
    Brites, Catarina
    Pereira, Fernando
    Ascenso, Joao
    [J]. 2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTIMEDIA & EXPO WORKSHOPS (ICMEW), 2017,
  • [6] RENDERING-AWARE POINT CLOUD CODING FOR MIXED REALITY DEVICES
    Capraro, Fabio
    Milani, Simone
    [J]. 2019 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE PROCESSING (ICIP), 2019, : 3706 - 3710
  • [7] Objective and Subjective QoE Evaluation for Adaptive Point Cloud Streaming
    van der Hooft, Jeroen
    Vega, Maria Torres
    Timmerer, Christian
    Begen, Ali C.
    De Turck, Filip
    Schatz, Raimund
    [J]. 2020 TWELFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON QUALITY OF MULTIMEDIA EXPERIENCE (QOMEX), 2020,
  • [8] Point cloud subjective evaluation methodology based on 2D rendering
    Alexiou, Evangelos
    Bernardo, Marco, V
    da Silva Cruz, Luis A.
    Dmitrovic, Lovorka Gotal
    Duarte, Carlos
    Dumic, Emil
    Ebrahimi, Touradj
    Matkovic, Dragan
    Pereira, Manuela
    Pinheiro, Antonio
    Skodras, Athanasios
    [J]. 2018 TENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON QUALITY OF MULTIMEDIA EXPERIENCE (QOMEX), 2018, : 132 - 137
  • [9] SUBJECTIVE-OBJECTIVE RENDERING OF TECHNOLOGY
    RASKIN, M
    [J]. HUMANIST, 1973, 33 (05) : 25 - 27
  • [10] Subjective and Objective Quality Evaluation of Compressed Point Clouds
    Javaheri, Alireza
    Brites, Catarina
    Pereira, Fernando
    Ascenso, Joao
    [J]. 2017 IEEE 19TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON MULTIMEDIA SIGNAL PROCESSING (MMSP), 2017,