The unimportance of the reaction H2 + N2O ⇆ H2O + N2: A shock-tube study using H2O time histories and ignition delay times

被引:22
|
作者
Mulvihill, Clayton R. [1 ]
Mathieu, Olivier [1 ]
Petersen, Eric L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Mech Engn, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
H-2; -; N2O; Laser absorption; Hydrogen; Nitrous oxide; HIGH-TEMPERATURE PHOTOCHEMISTRY; SHOCK-TUBE; NITROUS-OXIDE; KINETIC MECHANISM; H2O TRANSITIONS; RATE-CONSTANT; DELAY TIMES; HYDROGEN; IGNITION; MIXTURES;
D O I
10.1016/j.combustflame.2018.07.003
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
The hydrogen-nitrous oxide (H-2-N2O) system is of paramount importance in safety considerations for nuclear waste management and semiconductor manufacturing. For less-dilute H-2-N2O mixtures, a reaction of key importance in determining ignition delay times is the direct reaction between H-2 and N2O to give H2O and N-2, although this reaction has received only one direct investigation in the work of Kosarev et al. (2007). To examine the importance of the title reaction, new H2O time histories were obtained using a laser absorption technique at 1.39 pm in a mixture of 0.222% N2O/1.778% H-2/Ar between 1414 and 1811 K near 1.2 atm. Additionally, the ignition delay time measurements of Kosarev et al. (2007) were repeated using endwall emission and pressure diagnostics. The new datasets show excellent agreement with the predictions of a recent mechanism when the title reaction is reduced by a factor of 30 relative to the work of Kosarev et al. Furthermore, the accurate mechanism predictions of H-2-N2O ignition delay time data available in the literature (other than those of Kosarev et al.) were not degraded when the proposed value of k(1) = 7.0 x 10(13)exp(-16, 356/T) was used (k(1) in cm(3) mole(-1) s(-1), Tin K). This expression for k(1) should be viewed as an upper limit on the rate for the title reaction and should make the title reaction negligibly important in future NOx modeling efforts; the true value of k(1) is likely even lower than this expression. A factor of 2 uncertainty is assigned to this expression for k(1). Finally, it is recommended that the data of Kosarev et al. (2007) be neglected in future mechanism validations as these data appear to be inaccurate, in part due to non-ideal pressure rise effects and choice of emission diagnostic. (C) 2018 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:478 / 486
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The unimportance of the reaction H2 + N2O ⇆ H2O + N2: A shock-tube study using H2O time histories and ignition delay times (vol 196, pg 478, 2018)
    Mulvihill, Clayton R.
    Mathieu, Olivier
    Petersen, Eric L.
    COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 2019, 204 : 430 - 430
  • [2] SHOCK-TUBE STUDIES OF N2O DECOMPOSITION AND N2O-H2 REACTION
    HIDAKA, Y
    TAKUMA, H
    SUGA, M
    BULLETIN OF THE CHEMICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN, 1985, 58 (10) : 2911 - 2916
  • [3] Velocity of N2 upon dissociation of N2O in N2O•(H2O)m
    Gandhi, SR
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A, 1999, 103 (50): : 10713 - 10718
  • [4] Shock tube study of artificial ignition of N2O:O2:H2:Ar mixtures
    Kosarev, I. N.
    Starikovskaia, S. M.
    Starikovskii, A. Y.
    SHOCK WAVES, VOL 1, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 769 - 774
  • [5] Properties of (H2O)n, (H2O)n, and (H2O)nH+ clusters.
    Jordan, KD
    Vila, F
    Christie, R
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1999, 218 : U387 - U387
  • [6] Relaxation of H2O from its |04⟩- vibrational state in collisions with H2O, Ar, H2, N2, and O2
    Barnes, PW
    Sims, IR
    Smith, IWM
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 120 (12): : 5592 - 5600
  • [7] SHOCK-TUBE STUDY OF H2-O2-CO-AR AND H2-N2O-CO-AR SYSTEMS - MEASUREMENT OF RATE CONSTANT FOR H + N2O = N2 + OH
    DEAN, AM
    STEINER, DC
    WANG, EE
    COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 1978, 32 (01) : 73 - 83
  • [8] H2 or H2O?
    Valinotti, Diego
    TCE, 2007, (789): : 58 - 58
  • [9] N2O AND H2O ATMOSPHERIC THERMAL EMISSIONS
    HARRISON, AW
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 1975, 53 (07) : 674 - 682
  • [10] The water dimer reaction OH + (H2O)2 → (H2O)-OH + H2O
    Gao, Aifang
    Li, Guoliang
    Peng, Bin
    Xie, Yaoming
    Schaefer, Henry F., III
    PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 19 (28) : 18279 - 18287