Roughness perception: A multisensory/crossmodal perspective

被引:41
|
作者
Di Stefano, Nicola [1 ]
Spence, Charles [2 ]
机构
[1] CNR, Inst Cognit Sci & Technol, Rome, Italy
[2] Univ Oxford, Oxford, England
关键词
Auditory consonance; dissonance; Human vocalizations; Astringency; Intersensory; Taste; Touch; Olfaction; Vision; CROSS-MODAL ASSOCIATIONS; TACTILE ROUGHNESS; SURFACE-TEXTURE; GROOVED SURFACES; ORAL ASTRINGENCY; AUDITORY-CORTEX; TEMPORAL CUES; HUMAN HAND; TOUCH; MUSIC;
D O I
10.3758/s13414-022-02550-y
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Roughness is a perceptual attribute typically associated with certain stimuli that are presented in one of the spatial senses. In auditory research, the term is typically used to describe the harsh effects that are induced by particular sound qualities (i.e., dissonance) and human/animal vocalizations (e.g., screams, distress cries). In the tactile domain, roughness is a crucial factor determining the perceptual features of a surface. The same feature can also be ascertained visually, by means of the extraction of pattern features that determine the haptic quality of surfaces, such as grain size and density. By contrast, the term roughness has rarely been applied to the description of those stimuli perceived via the chemical senses. In this review, we take a critical look at the putative meaning(s) of the term roughness, when used in both unisensory and multisensory contexts, in an attempt to answer two key questions: (1) Is the use of the term 'roughness' the same in each modality when considered individually? and (2) Do crossmodal correspondences involving roughness match distinct perceptual features or (at least on certain occasions) do they merely pick-up on an amodal property? We start by examining the use of the term in the auditory domain. Next, we summarize the ways in which the term roughness has been used in the literature on tactile and visual perception, and in the domain of olfaction and gustation. Then, we move on to the crossmodal context, reviewing the literature on the perception of roughness in the audiovisual, audiotactile, and auditory-gustatory/olfactory domains. Finally, we highlight some limitations of the reviewed literature and we outline a number of key directions for future empirical research in roughness perception.
引用
收藏
页码:2087 / 2114
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Roughness perception: A multisensory/crossmodal perspective
    Nicola Di Stefano
    Charles Spence
    Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2022, 84 : 2087 - 2114
  • [2] Perception: A Multisensory Perspective
    Spence, Charles
    MULTISENSORY RESEARCH, 2020, 33 (03) : 363 - 373
  • [3] Perception: A Multisensory Perspective
    Cicchini, Guido Marco
    PERCEPTION, 2019, 48 (05) : 456 - 457
  • [4] Crossmodal attention and multisensory integration
    Spence, S
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 19 (01) : 62 - 62
  • [5] Multisensory roughness perception of virtual surfaces: Effects of correlated cues
    Weisenberger, JM
    Poling, GL
    12TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON HAPTIC INTERFACES FOR VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENT AND TELEOPERATOR SYSTEMS, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, : 161 - 168
  • [6] Crossmodal cueing effects on multisensory integration
    Blurton, S. P.
    Gondan, M.
    Greenlee, M. W.
    PERCEPTION, 2013, 42 : 172 - 172
  • [7] Crossmodal shaping of pain: a multisensory approach to nociception
    Senkowski, Daniel
    Hoefle, Marion
    Engel, Andreas K.
    TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2014, 18 (06) : 319 - 327
  • [8] Crossmodal associations modulate multisensory spatial integration
    Jonathan Tong
    Lux Li
    Patrick Bruns
    Brigitte Röder
    Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2020, 82 : 3490 - 3506
  • [9] Crossmodal associations modulate multisensory spatial integration
    Tong, Jonathan
    Li, Lux
    Bruns, Patrick
    Roeder, Brigitte
    ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2020, 82 (07) : 3490 - 3506
  • [10] Is the primary visual cortex multisensory? Comment on "Crossmodal influences on visual perception" by Prof. Ladan Shams
    Barone, Pascal
    PHYSICS OF LIFE REVIEWS, 2010, 7 (03) : 291 - 292