Pioglitazone and rosiglitazone have different effects on serum lipoprotein particle concentrations and sizes in patients with type 2 diabetes and dyslipidemia

被引:158
|
作者
Deeg, Mark A.
Buse, John B.
Goldberg, Ronald B.
Kendall, David M.
Zagar, Anthony J.
Jacober, Scott J.
Khan, Mehmood A.
Perez, Alfonzo T.
Tan, Meng H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Eli Lilly & Co, Lilly Res Lab, Indianapolis, IN 46285 USA
[2] Indiana Univ, Vet Affairs Hosp, Dept Endocrinol & Metab, Indianapolis, IN USA
[3] Univ No Carolina, Dept Endocrinol & Gen Med, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[4] Univ Miami, Dept Diabet Endocrinol & Metab, Miami, FL USA
[5] Pk Nicollet Inst, Int Diabetes Ctr, Minneapolis, MN USA
[6] Takeda Pharmaceut, Lincolnshire, IL USA
[7] Takeda Global Res & Dev, Lincolnshire, IL USA
关键词
D O I
10.2337/dc06-1903
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE - Associated with insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes are increased serum triglycerides, decreased HDL cholesterol, and a predominance of large VLDL, small LDL, and small HDL particles. The comparative effects of thiazolidinedione insulin sensitizers on serum lipoprotein particle concentrations and sizes in type 2 diabetes are not known. We studied the effects of pioglitazone (PIO) and rosightazone (ROSI) treatments on serum lipoprotein particle concentrations and sizes in type 2 diabetic patients with dyslipidemia. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - This is a prospective, randomized, doubleblind, multicenter, parallel-group study. After a 4-week placebo washout period, patients randomized to PIO (n = 369) were treated with 30 mg q.d. for 12 weeks followed by 45 mg q.d. for another 12 weeks, while patients randomized to ROSI (n = 366) were treated with 4 mg q.d. followed by 4 mg b.i.d. for the same intervals. Lipoprotein subclass particle concentrations and sizes were determined by proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy at baseline and end point (PIO [n = 333] and ROSI [n = 325] patients). RESULTS - PIO treatment increased total VLDL particle concentration less than ROSI treatment and decreased VLDL particle size more than ROSI. PIO treatment reduced total LDL particle concentration, whereas ROSI treatment increased it. Both treatments increased LDL particle size, with PIO treatment having a greater effect. Whereas PIO treatment increased total HDL particle concentration and size, ROSI treatment decreased them; both increased HDL cholesterol levels. CONCLUSIONS - PIO and ROSI treatments have different effects on serum lipoprotein subclass particle concentrations and sizes in patients with type 2 diabetes and dyslipidemia.
引用
收藏
页码:2458 / 2464
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comparison of effects of pioglitazone and rosiglitazone on serum lipoproteins and their subfractions in patients with type 2 diabetes and dyslipidemia
    Tan, MH
    Kendall, DM
    Deeg, MA
    Buse, JB
    Goldberg, R
    Zagar, AJ
    Khan, MA
    Perez, AT
    Jacober, SJ
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2005, 48 : A393 - A394
  • [2] The comparative effects of pioglitazone and rosiglitazone on lipoprotein sub-fractions in patients with type 2 diabetes and dyslipidemia
    Deeg, MA
    Goldberg, RB
    Buse, JB
    Kendall, DM
    Zagar, AJ
    Pinaire, JA
    Tan, MH
    Khan, MA
    Perez, AT
    Jacober, SJ
    DIABETES, 2005, 54 : A234 - A235
  • [3] A comparison of lipid and glycemic effects of pioglitazone and rosiglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes and dyslipidemia
    Goldberg, RB
    Kendall, DM
    Deeg, MA
    Buse, JB
    Zagar, AJ
    Pinaire, JA
    Tan, MH
    Khan, MA
    Perez, AT
    Jacober, SJ
    CIRCULATION, 2005, 111 (13) : 1727 - 1728
  • [4] A comparison of lipid and glycemic effects of pioglitazone and rosiglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes and dyslipidemia
    Goldberg, RB
    Kendall, DM
    Deeg, MA
    Buse, JB
    Zagar, AJ
    Pinaire, JA
    Tan, MH
    Khan, MA
    Perez, AT
    Jacober, SJ
    DIABETES CARE, 2005, 28 (07) : 1547 - 1554
  • [5] Effects of rosiglitazone and pioglitazone on lipoprotein metabolism in patients with Type 2 diabetes and normal lipids
    Brackenridge, A. L.
    Jackson, N.
    Jefferson, W.
    Stolinski, M.
    Shojaee-Moradie, F.
    Hovorka, R.
    Umpleby, A. M.
    Russell-Jones, D.
    DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2009, 26 (05) : 532 - 539
  • [6] A comparison of nontraditional atherogenic markers with pioglitazone and rosiglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes and dyslipidemia
    Law, R
    Khan, M
    Perez, A
    Jacober, S
    Goldberg, R
    Kendall, D
    Deeg, M
    Tan, M
    Demissie, S
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2005, 48 : A286 - A286
  • [7] A comparison of lipid and glycemic effects of pioglitazone and rosiglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes and dyslipidemia - Response to Bell and Brunzell
    Goldberg, RB
    Kendall, DM
    Deeg, MA
    Buse, JB
    Zagar, AJ
    Pinaire, JA
    Tan, MH
    Khan, MA
    Perez, AT
    Jacober, SJ
    DIABETES CARE, 2005, 28 (12) : 2985 - 2986
  • [8] Pioglitazone versus rosiglitazone treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes and dyslipidemia: cost-effectiveness in the US
    Tunis, Sandra L.
    Minshall, Michael E.
    Charles, Meaghan St.
    Pandya, Bhavik J.
    Baran, Robert W.
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2008, 24 (11) : 3085 - 3096
  • [9] Different Effects of Thiazolidinediones on Cardiovascular Risk in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Pioglitazone vs Rosiglitazone
    Simo, Rafael
    Rodriguez, Angel
    Caveda, Elena
    CURRENT DRUG SAFETY, 2010, 5 (03) : 234 - 244
  • [10] A comparison of lipid and glycemic effects of pioglitazone and rosiglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes and dyslipidemia - Response to Goldberg et al.
    Brunzell, JD
    DIABETES CARE, 2005, 28 (12) : 2984 - 2985