Selection of Head and Neck Cancer Patients for Intensive Therapy

被引:8
|
作者
Vitzthum, Lucas K. [1 ]
Park, Helen [1 ]
Zakeri, Kaveh [1 ]
Bryant, Alex K. [1 ]
Feng, Christine [1 ]
Shen, Hanjie [2 ]
Cohen, Ezra E. W. [3 ]
Murphy, James D. [1 ,2 ]
Mell, Loren K. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Radiat Med & Appl Sci, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[2] Ctr Precis Radiat Med, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Med, Div Hematol & Oncol, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
关键词
SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; HUMAN-PAPILLOMAVIRUS; NONOROPHARYNGEAL HEAD; ENDOMETRIAL CANCER; ELDERLY-PATIENTS; PROGNOSTIC ROLE; OROPHARYNGEAL; RADIOTHERAPY; MODEL; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.09.011
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Previous studies have found that patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) with a higher relative hazard for recurrence versus competing mortality (omega(+) ratio) are more likely to benefit from intensive therapy. Nomograms to predict this ratio (omega scores) can be useful to guide clinical management; however, comorbidity and other risk factors are frequently lacking from trial samples. Methods and Materials: In this study of 7117 US veterans, we evaluated the ability of a omega score nomogram developed from clinical trial data to stratify patients with HNC treated with radiation therapy by their relative risk of cancer progression versus competing mortality. We then fit generalized competing event models to determine the effect of comorbidity and other covariates on the omega(+) ratio. Results: The omega score was effective in stratifying patients with HNC according to their risk for cancer recurrence relative to competing mortality, especially among patients aged >70 years. Patients with omega score >= 0.80 were more likely to receive intensive therapy compared with patients with a omega score >= 0.80 (66 vs. 54%; P < .001). On multivariable generalized competing event regression, T2-4 category (relative hazard ratio [RHR], 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.16), N2-3 category (RHR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.01-1.15), and being employed (RHR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.03-1.20) were associated with increased omega(+) ratio, and increasing age (RHR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.78-0.89), Charlson comorbidity index >= 2 (RHR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.79-0.91), being a current smoker (RHR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.84-0.96), and lower body mass index (RHR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.84-0.95) were associated with a decreased omega(+) ratio. Conclusions: The omega scores are effective in stratifying patients with HNC and are correlated with the intensity of treatment given. The u scores incorporating comorbidity and other risk factors could help identify patients with HNC most likely to benefit from intensive therapy. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 166
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] SELECTION OF DEFINITIVE THERAPY IN CANCER OF HEAD AND NECK
    CHAMBERS, RG
    [J]. MARYLAND STATE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1974, 23 (03) : 50 - 54
  • [2] Advanced selection procedures for proton therapy in head and neck cancer patients.
    Scandurra, D.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 127 : S179 - S180
  • [3] PAIN THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH CANCER OF THE HEAD AND NECK
    LUCKHAUPT, H
    KEIL, K
    ROSE, KG
    [J]. LARYNGO-RHINO-OTOLOGIE, 1991, 70 (12) : 683 - 685
  • [4] A Decision Support Tool to Optimize Selection of Head and Neck Cancer Patients for Proton Therapy
    Tambas, Makbule
    van der Laan, Hans Paul
    van der Schaaf, Arjen
    Steenbakkers, Roel J. H. M.
    Langendijk, Johannes Albertus
    [J]. CANCERS, 2022, 14 (03)
  • [5] Intensive dysphagia rehabilitation program for patients with head and neck cancer
    Charters, Emma
    Clark, Jonathan
    [J]. ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 92 (03) : 505 - 510
  • [6] Preselection Tool for the Model-Based Selection of Head and Neck Cancer Patients for Proton Therapy
    Tambas, M.
    van der Laan, H. P.
    Hoek, A. V. D.
    Bijl, H. P.
    Dieters, M.
    Scandurra, D.
    Both, S.
    Steenbakkers, R.
    Langendijk, J. A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2019, 105 (01): : E384 - E384
  • [7] First experience with model-based selection of head and neck cancer patients for proton therapy
    Tambas, Makbule
    Steenbakkers, Roel J. H. M.
    van der Laan, Hans P.
    Wolters, Atje M.
    Kierkels, Roel G. J.
    Scandurra, Dan
    Korevaar, Erik W.
    Oldehinkel, Edwin
    van Zon-Meijer, Tineke W. H.
    Both, Stefan
    van den Hoek, Johanna G. M.
    Langendijk, Johannes A.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 151 : 206 - 213
  • [8] First experience with the model-based selection of head and neck cancer patients for proton therapy
    Tambas, M.
    Van der Laan, H. P.
    Van den Hoek, J. G. M.
    Bijl, H. P.
    Dieters, M.
    Kierkels, R. G. J.
    Scandurra, D.
    Both, S.
    Steenbakkers, R. J. H. M.
    Langendijk, J. A.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2019, 133 : S293 - S294
  • [9] Pain therapy in patients with advanced head and neck cancer
    Maier, C
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1998, 77 : 49 - 49
  • [10] Independent validation of a dysphagia dose response model for the selection of head and neck cancer patients to proton therapy
    Kalendralis, Petros
    Sloep, Matthijs
    George, Nibin Moni
    Snel, Jasper
    Veugen, Joeri
    Hoebers, Frank
    Wesseling, Frederik
    Unipan, Mirko
    Veening, Martijn
    Langendijk, Johannes A.
    Dekker, Andre
    van Soest, Johan
    Fijten, Rianne
    [J]. PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2022, 24 : 47 - 52