Validation of a Current Definition of Early Allograft Dysfunction in Liver Transplant Recipients and Analysis of Risk Factors

被引:950
|
作者
Olthoff, Kim M. [1 ]
Kulik, Laura [2 ]
Samstein, Benjamin [3 ]
Kaminski, Mary
Abecassis, Michael [4 ]
Emond, Jean [3 ]
Shaked, Abraham
Christie, Jason D. [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Div Transplantat, Penn Transplant Inst,Dept Surg, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Dept Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Dept Surg, New York, NY USA
[4] Northwestern Univ, Dept Surg, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[5] Univ Penn, Dept Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[6] Univ Penn, Dept Epidemiol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
GRAFT FUNCTION; UNITED-STATES; LUNG TRANSPLANTATION; DONOR LIVER; CRITERIA; PREDICTORS; ALLOCATION; SELECTION; EVALUATE; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1002/lt.22091
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Translational studies in liver transplantation often require an endpoint of graft function or dysfunction beyond graft loss Prior definitions of early allograft dysfunction (EAD) vary, and none have been validated in a large multicenter population in the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) era. We examined an updated definition of EAD to validate previously used criteria, and correlated this definition with graft and patient outcome We performed a cohort study of 300 deceased donor liver transplants at 3 U.S. programs EAD was defined as the presence of one or more of the following previously defined postoperative laboratory analyses reflective of liver injury and function. bilirubin >= 10mg/dL on day 7, international normalized ratio >= 1 6 on day 7, and alanine or aspartate aminotransferases >2000 IU/L within the first 7 days To assess predictive validity, the EAD definition was tested for association with graft and patient survival Risk factors for EAD were assessed using multivariable logistic regression. Overall incidence of EAD was 23 2% Most grafts met the definition with increased bilirubin at day 7 or high levels of aminotransferases. Of recipients meeting the EAD definition, 18 8% died, as opposed to 1.8% of recipients without EAD (relative risk = 10.7 [95% confidence interval. 3.6, 31 9] P < 0 0001). More recipients with EAD lost their grafts (26.1%) than recipients with no EAD (35%) (relative risk = 74 [95% confidence interval. 34, 16.3] P < 0 0001) Donor age and MELD score were significant EAD risk factors in a multivariate model. In summary a simple definition of EAD using objective posttransplant criteria identified a 23% incidence, and was highly associated with graft loss and patient mortality, validating previously published criteria This definition can be used as an endpoint in translational studies aiming to identify mechanistic pathways leading to a subgroup of liver grafts with clinical expression of suboptimal function Liver Transpl 16:943-949, 2010. (C) 2010 AASLD.
引用
收藏
页码:943 / 949
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Predictive model and risk factors associated with a revised definition of early allograft dysfunction in liver transplant recipients
    Nicolau-Raducu, Ramona
    Cohen, Ari J.
    Bokhari, Amjad
    Bohorquez, Humberto
    Bruce, David
    Carmody, Ian
    Bugeaud, Emily
    Seal, John
    Sonnier, Dennis
    Nossaman, Bobby
    Loss, George
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 31 (11)
  • [2] Validity of the definition of early allograft dysfunction in liver transplant recipients.
    Olthoff, Kim
    Christie, Jason
    Samstein, Benjamin
    Kulik, Laura
    Shaked, Abraham
    Abecassis, Michael
    Emond, Jean
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2007, 7 : 469 - 469
  • [3] Risk factors, surgical complications and graft survival in liver transplant recipients with early allograft dysfunction
    Bastos-Neves, Douglas
    de Oliveira Salvalaggio, Paolo Rogerio
    de Almeida, Marcio Dias
    HEPATOBILIARY & PANCREATIC DISEASES INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 18 (05) : 423 - 429
  • [4] Risk factors, surgical complications and graft survival in liver transplant recipients with early allograft dysfunction
    Douglas Bastos-Neves
    Paolo Rogerio de Oliveira Salvalaggio
    Marcio Dias de Almeida
    Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International, 2019, 18 (05) : 423 - 429
  • [5] Early Allograft Dysfunction in High Acuity Liver Transplant Recipients.
    Ito, T.
    Lu, M.
    Murray, A.
    Graham, D. S.
    DiNorcia, J.
    Agopian, V. G.
    Yersiz, H.
    Farmer, D. G.
    Busuttil, R. W.
    Kaldas, F. M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2019, 19 : 994 - 994
  • [6] REDUCING THE RISK OF EARLY ALLOGRAFT DYSFUNCTION IN LIVER TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS BY ACTIVATION OF THE PREGNANE X RECEPTOR (PXR)
    Amer, Aimen
    Vallance, Abigail
    Mccoll, Kirsty
    Kanwar, Aditya
    Wright, Matthew
    White, Steven
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 28 : 137 - 137
  • [7] Risk factors for renal dysfunction in liver transplant recipients.
    Pawarode, A
    Fine, D
    Yoo, HY
    Thuluvath, PJ
    HEPATOLOGY, 2002, 36 (04) : 227A - 227A
  • [8] Clinical Risk Factors and Outcomes Associated with the Development of Early Allograft Dysfunction in DBD Liver Transplant
    Flores, E.
    Hessheimer, A. J.
    Saavedra, D.
    Rafael, L.
    Crespo, G.
    Fuster, J.
    Forns, X.
    Rimola, A.
    Garcia-Valdecasas, J. C.
    Fondevila, C.
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2011, 17 (06) : S283 - S283
  • [9] The Influence of Pharmacological Preconditioning with Sevoflurane on Incidence of Early Allograft Dysfunction in Liver Transplant Recipients
    Minou, Andrei F.
    Dzyadzko, Alexander M.
    Shcherba, Aliaksei E.
    Rummo, Oleg O.
    ANESTHESIOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2012, 2012
  • [10] Risk factors for allograft failure in liver transplant recipients Graft failure after liver transplantation
    Huesing-Kabar, Anna
    zu Dohna, Christina
    Heinzow, Hauke
    Cicinnati, Vito Rosario
    Beckebaum, Susanne
    Schmidt, Martina
    Gerth, Hans Ulrich
    Pohlen, Michele
    Wilms, Christian
    Palmes, Daniel
    Schmidt, Hartmut Hans-Jurgen
    Kabar, Iyad
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE, 2018, 56 (07): : 745 - 751