Uterine artery embolization: Reduced radiation with refined technique

被引:51
|
作者
Nikolic, B
Spies, JB
Campbell, L
Walsh, SM
Abbara, S
Lundsten, MJ
机构
[1] Georgetown Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Washington, DC 20007 USA
[2] Georgetown Univ Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol & Radiotherapy, Washington, DC 20007 USA
关键词
fibroids; radiations; injurious effects; uterine arteries; embolization; uterus; neoplasms;
D O I
10.1016/S1051-0443(07)61400-6
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To determine the estimated absorbed ovarian dose (EAOD) and absorbed skin dose (ASD) that occurs during uterine artery embolization (UAE) using pulsed fluoroscopy and a refined procedure protocol. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The absorbed dose was measured in 20 patients who underwent UAE procedures. Radiation was limited by using low frequency pulsed fluoroscopy, bilateral catheter technique with simultaneous injections for embolization as well as pre-and postembolization exposures and focus on limitation of magnified and oblique fluoroscopy. Lithium fluoride dosimeters were placed both in the posterior vaginal fornix and on the skin at the beam entrance site. The vaginal dose was used to approximate the EAOD. Fluoroscopy time and exposures were recorded. The mean values for all patients were calculated and compared to our previous results obtained with conventional fluoroscopy and to threshold doses for the induction of deterministic skin injury. RESULTS: Mean fluoroscopy time was 10.95 min. (range 6-21.3 min.) and the mean number of angiographic exposures was 20.9 (range 14-53). The mean EAOD was 9.5 cGy (range 2.21-23.21 cGy) and the mean ASD was 47.69 cGy (range 10.83-110.14 cGy). This compares to previous results with non-pulsed fluoroscopy of an EAOD of 22.34 cGy (range 4.25-65.08 cGy) and an ASD of 162.32 cGy (range 66.01-303.89 cGy) as well as threshold doses for induction of deterministic radiation injury to the skin (400-500 cGy). CONCLUSION: When pulsed fluoroscopy is used with emphasis on dose reduction techniques, the EAOD and ASD can be substantially reduced to less than 1/2 (P = .017) and 1/3 (P < .0001) when compared to UAE performed with nonpulsed fluoroscopy. These radiation reduction tools should therefore be applied whenever possible.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 44
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reporting radiation dose for uterine artery embolization
    LaBerge, JM
    RADIOLOGY, 2001, 218 (03) : 917 - 918
  • [2] Uterine artery embolization: A minimally invasive technique for the treatment of uterine fibroids
    Wong, GCH
    Muir, SJ
    Lai, APW
    Goodwin, SC
    JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH & GENDER-BASED MEDICINE, 2000, 9 (04): : 357 - 362
  • [3] Reporting radiation dose for uterine artery embolization - Response
    Nikolic, B
    Spies, JB
    Lundsten, MJ
    Abbara, S
    RADIOLOGY, 2001, 218 (03) : 918 - 918
  • [4] Uterine artery embolization for fibroids: Measurement of radiation dose
    Rasuli, P
    Lavoie, C
    Hammond, I
    French, GJ
    RADIOLOGY, 1999, 213P : 133 - 133
  • [5] Patient radiation dose associated with uterine artery embolization
    Nikolic, B
    Spies, JB
    Lundsten, MJ
    Abbara, S
    RADIOLOGY, 2000, 214 (01) : 121 - 125
  • [6] Uterine artery embolization
    Dave, Bhavesh
    Bhatt, Naveen
    Khalasi, Yogendr A.
    Balasubramanya, K. S.
    Gupta, Mohit
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY OF INDIA, 2005, 55 (03): : 275 - 277
  • [7] Uterine artery embolization
    Rohr, Aaron
    APPLIED RADIOLOGY, 2019, 48 (05)
  • [8] Assessment of organ radiation dose associated with uterine artery embolization
    Glomset, O
    Hellesnes, J
    Heimland, N
    Hafsahl, G
    Smith, HJ
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2006, 47 (02) : 179 - 185
  • [9] Update on uterine artery embolization for symptomatic fibroid disease (uterine artery embolization)
    Morris, Christopher S.
    ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2008, 33 (01): : 104 - 111
  • [10] Postpartum hemorrhage with uterine artery embolization: the risk of complications of uterine artery embolization
    Kim, Min Jung
    Kim, Il Jung
    Kim, Shinyoung
    Park, In Yang
    MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY & ALLIED TECHNOLOGIES, 2022, 31 (02) : 276 - 283