In vitro susceptibility testing of Aspergillus spp. against voriconazole, itraconazole, posaconazole, amphotericin B and caspofungin

被引:16
|
作者
Shi Jun-yan [1 ]
Xu Ying-chun [1 ]
Shi Yi [2 ]
Lue Huo-xiang [3 ]
Liu Yong [4 ]
Zhao Wang-sheng [5 ]
Chen Dong-mei [6 ]
Xi Li-yan [7 ]
Zhou Xin [8 ]
Wang He [1 ]
Guo Li-na [1 ]
机构
[1] China Acad Med Sci, Peking Union Med Coll, Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Clin Microbiol Lab, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Gen Hosp Nanjing Mil Command, Dept Resp, Nanjing 210002, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Prov Peoples Hosp, Clin Lab, Hangzhou 310014, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[4] China Med Univ, Shengjing Hosp, Clin Lab, Shenyang 110001, Liaoning, Peoples R China
[5] Jiangsu Prov Hosp, Clin Microbiol Lab, Nanjing 210029, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[6] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Clin Lab, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[7] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Dermatol, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[8] Shanghai First Peoples Hosp, Dept Resp, Shanghai 200080, Peoples R China
关键词
aspergillus; antifungal agents; drug resistance; antifungal activity; MICRODILUTION METHODS; FILAMENTOUS FUNGI; ETEST; FUMIGATUS; COMBINATION; EFFICACY; MODEL; MICS;
D O I
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.2010.19.016
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background During recent years, the incidence of serious infections caused by opportunistic fungi has increased dramatically due to alterations of the immune status of patients with hematological diseases, malignant tumors, transplantations and so forth. Unfortunately, the wide use of triazole antifungal agents to treat these infections has lead to the emergence of Aspergillus spp. resistant to triazoles. The present study was to assess the in vitro activities of five antifungal agents (voriconazole, itraconazole, posaconazole, amphotericin B and caspofungin) against different kinds of Aspergillus spp. that are commonly encountered in the clinical setting. Methods The agar-based Etest MIC method was employed. One hundred and seven strains of Aspergillus spp. (5 species) were collected and prepared according to Etest Technique Manuel. Etest MICs were determined with RPMI agar containing 2% glucose and were read after incubation for 48 hours at 35 degrees C. MIC50, MIC90 and MIC range were acquired by Whonet 5.4 software. Results The MIC90 of caspofungin against A. fumigatus, A. flavus and A. nidulans was 0.094 mu g/ml whereas the MIC90 against A. niger was 0.19 mu g/ml. For these four species, the MIC90 of caspofungin was the lowest among the five antifungal agents. For A. terrus, the MIC90 of posaconazole was the lowest. For A. fumigatus and A. flavus, the MIC90 in order of increasing was caspofungin, posaconazole, voriconazole, itraconazole, and amphotericin B. The MIC of amphotericin B against A. terrus was higher than 32 mu g/ml in all 7 strains tested. Conclusions The in vitro antifungal susceptibility test shows the new drug caspofungin, which is a kind of echinocandins, has good activity against the five species of Aspergillus spp. and all the triazoles tested have better in vitro activity than traditional amphotericin B. Chin Med J 2010;123(19):2706-2709
引用
收藏
页码:2706 / 2709
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [2] In vitro susceptibility to amphotericin B, itraconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole and caspofungin of Aspergillus spp. isolated from patients with haematological malignancies in Tunisia
    Gheith, Soukeina
    Saghrouni, Fatma
    Bannour, Wadiaa
    Ben Youssef, Yosra
    Khelif, Abderrahim
    Normand, Anne-Cecile
    Piarroux, Renaud
    Ben Said, Moncef
    Njah, Mansour
    Ranque, Stephane
    SPRINGERPLUS, 2014, 3
  • [3] In vitro synergy testing of anidulafungin with itraconazole, voriconazole, and amphotericin B against Aspergillus spp. and Fusatium spp.
    Philip, A
    Odabasi, Z
    Rodriguez, J
    Paetznick, VL
    Chen, E
    Rex, JH
    Ostrosky-Zeichner, L
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2005, 49 (08) : 3572 - 3574
  • [4] In vitro pharmacodynamics of amphotericin B, itraconazole, and voriconazole against Aspergillus, Fusarium, and Scedosporium spp.
    Lewis, RE
    Wiederhold, NP
    Klepser, ME
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2005, 49 (03) : 945 - 951
  • [5] In-vitro activity of voriconazole against Aspergillus spp. And comparison with itraconazole and amphotericin B
    Oakley, KL
    Moore, CB
    Denning, DW
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1998, 42 (01) : 91 - 94
  • [6] Germinated and nongerminated conidial suspensions for testing of susceptibilities of Aspergillus spp. to amphotericin B, itraconazole, posaconazole, ravuconazole, and voriconazole
    Espinel-Ingroff, A
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2001, 45 (02) : 605 - 607
  • [7] Antifungal susceptibility testing of Exophiala spp.: a head-to-head comparison of amphotericin B, itraconazole, posaconazole and voriconazole
    Fothergill, Annette W.
    Rinaldi, Michael G.
    Sutton, Deanna A.
    MEDICAL MYCOLOGY, 2009, 47 (01) : 41 - 43
  • [8] Comparative in vitro activities of posaconazole, voriconazole, itraconazole, and amphotericin B against Aspergillus and Rhizopus, and synergy testing for Rhizopus
    Arikan, Sevtap
    Sancak, Banu
    Alp, Sehnaz
    Hascelik, Gulsen
    Mcnicholas, Paul
    MEDICAL MYCOLOGY, 2008, 46 (06) : 567 - 573
  • [9] In vitro susceptibilities of Aspergillus spp. causing otomycosis to amphotericin B, voriconazole and itraconazole
    Kaya, Ayse Demet
    Kiraz, Nuri
    MYCOSES, 2007, 50 (06) : 447 - 450
  • [10] In-vitro susceptibility of Aspergillus spp. isolates to amphotericin B and itraconazole
    Dannaoui, E
    Persat, F
    Monier, MF
    Borel, E
    Piens, MA
    Picot, S
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1999, 44 (04) : 553 - 555