Mining Industry 4.0-Opportunities and Barriers

被引:4
|
作者
Ulewicz, Robert [1 ]
Krstic, Bozidar [2 ]
Ingaldi, Manuela [1 ]
机构
[1] Czestochowa Tech Univ, Fac Management, Dept Prod Engn & Safety, Czestochowa, Poland
[2] Univ Kragujevac, Fac Engn, Sestre Janjic 6, Kragujevac 34000, Serbia
关键词
Mining; 4; 0; Industry; 0 mining engineering predictive; maintenance digital transformation multicriteria analysis smart; mining NAIADE operator 4; SOCIAL MULTICRITERIA EVALUATION; TECHNOLOGY; INTELLIGENT; STRATEGIES; MANAGEMENT; EFFICIENCY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.46544/AMS.v27i2.02
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Safety, development, and efficiency are the main slogans that guide modern mines. At the beginning of the fourth industrial revolution, they are familiar with innovations and modern technologies that allow them to create innovative solutions and build an environmentally friendly mining sector. The aim of the paper was to assess the feasibility of implementing the assumptions of the industrial revolution 4.0 in the mining industry. Based on the author's own research and literature research, a set of scenarios for the transformation process was developed. After the verification, three alternative scenarios related to the transformation process 4.0 in mines were used for the research. The transformation scenarios were assessed from the perspective of individual stakeholder groups. The NAIADE (Novel Approach to Imprecise Assessment and Decision Environments), which so far has not been used in the mining industry to assess development scenarios, the method was used to assess the transformation scenarios. The research identified and characterized nine groups of stakeholders. Based on the conducted structured interviews, a set of technical criteria for the assessment of scenarios was defined. The analysis results from the impact matrix and social impact matrix developed for the first time for the mining industry transformation scenarios. Based on the analysis of the impacts of individual factors, it was shown which scenario is the most acceptable for stakeholders and the best from a technical point of view. The research focuses on the deficit of digital competencies and the generational change, as well as the change in the competency requirements of the new type of worker-miner-operator 4.0.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 305
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Maritime 4.0-Opportunities in Digitalization and Advanced Manufacturing for Vessel Development
    Sullivan, Brendan P.
    Desai, Shantanoo
    Sole, Jordi
    Rossi, Monica
    Ramundo, Lucia
    Terzi, Sergio
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRY 4.0 AND SMART MANUFACTURING (ISM 2019), 2020, 42 : 246 - 253
  • [2] Operationalizing Industry 4.0: Understanding Barriers of Industry 4.0 and Circular Economy
    Halse, Lise Lillebrygfjeld
    Jaeger, Bjorn
    [J]. ADVANCES IN PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS: TOWARDS SMART PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, APMS 2019, PT II, 2019, : 135 - 142
  • [3] Opportunities and Challenges of Industry 4.0 for the steel industry
    Laura, Tolettini
    [J]. METALLURGIA ITALIANA, 2017, (10): : 68 - 70
  • [5] Barriers to Industry 4.0 Are Falling Fast
    Ruppenthal, Michael
    [J]. MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING, 2019, 163 (05): : 104 - 104
  • [6] Barriers to Industry 4.0 - Rethinking necessary?
    Hindernisse der Industrie 4.0 – Umdenken notwendig?
    [J]. 1600, Carl Hanser Verlag (112):
  • [7] Industry 4.0 and opportunities for energy sustainability
    Ghobakhloo, Morteza
    Fathi, Masood
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 295
  • [8] Industry 4.0, digitization, and opportunities for sustainability
    Ghobakhloo, Morteza
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 252
  • [9] Opportunities for Industry 4.0 to Support Remanufacturing
    Yang, Shanshan
    Raghavendra, Aravind M. R.
    Kaminski, Jacek
    Pepin, Helene
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2018, 8 (07):
  • [10] Opportunities of Sustainable Manufacturing in Industry 4.0
    Stock, T.
    Seliger, G.
    [J]. 13TH GLOBAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE MANUFACTURING - DECOUPLING GROWTH FROM RESOURCE USE, 2016, 40 : 536 - 541