Biomechanics and neural control of movement, 20 years later: what have we learned and what has changed?

被引：15

作者：

Nordin, Andrew D. ^{[1
]}

Rymer, William Z. ^{[2
,3
]}

Biewener, Andrew A. ^{[4
]}

Schwartz, Andrew B. ^{[5
]}

Chen, Daofen ^{[6
]}

Horak, Fay B. ^{[7
,8
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Florida, POB 116131, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA

[2] Rehabil Inst Chicago, Chicago, IL 60611 USA

[3] Northwestern Univ, Evanston, IL USA

[4] Harvard Univ, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA

[5] Univ Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA USA

[6] NINDS, Bldg 36,Rm 4D04, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA

[7] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Portland, OR 97201 USA

[8] Vet Affairs Portland Hlth Care Syst, Portland, OR USA

来源：

JOURNAL OF NEUROENGINEERING AND REHABILITATION | 2017年 / 14卷

关键词：

Biomechanics; Motor control; Locomotion; Cortex; Spinal cord; BANCOM; MOTOR CORTICAL ACTIVITY; FREE ARM MOVEMENTS; MEDIAL GASTROCNEMIUS-MUSCLE; POPULATION REPRESENTATION; 3-DIMENSIONAL SPACE; DRAWING MOVEMENTS; VISUAL TARGETS; BIOMEDICAL-RESEARCH; RECRUITMENT ORDER; GAMMA-MOTONEURONS;

D O I：

10.1186/s12984-017-0298-y

中图分类号：

R318 [生物医学工程];

学科分类号：

0831 ;

摘要：

We summarize content from the opening thematic session of the 20th anniversary meeting for Biomechanics and Neural Control of Movement (BANCOM). Scientific discoveries from the past 20 years of research are covered, highlighting the impacts of rapid technological, computational, and financial growth on motor control research. We discuss spinal-level communication mechanisms, relationships between muscle structure and function, and direct cortical movement representations that can be decoded in the control of neuroprostheses. In addition to summarizing the rich scientific ideas shared during the session, we reflect on research infrastructure and capacity that contributed to progress in the field, and outline unresolved issues and remaining open questions.

引用

页数：11

共 50 条

[1] Biomechanics and neural control of movement, 20 years later: what have we learned and what has changed?
Andrew D. Nordin
William Z. Rymer
Andrew A. Biewener
Andrew B. Schwartz
Daofen Chen
Fay B. Horak
[J]. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 14
[2] The Day One Talk, 20 Years Later: What Have We Learned?
Mack, Jennifer W.
[J]. JCO ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2023, 19 (04) : 164 - +
[3] THE ARTERIAL PULMONARY CATHETER - WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED 20 YEARS LATER
VILLAR, J
[J]. MEDICINA CLINICA, 1992, 98 (07): : 254 - 256
[4] The glass ceiling: what have we learned 20 years on?
Powell, Gary N.
Butterfield, D. Anthony
[J]. JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS-PEOPLE AND PERFORMANCE, 2015, 2 (04) : 306 - 326
[5] Biomechanics: what has changed?
Verna, Carlalberta
[J]. INFORMATIONEN AUS ORTHODONTIE UND KIEFERORTHOPAEDIE, 2022, 54 (03): : 171 - 176
[6] THE STS CURRICULUM - WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED IN 20 YEARS
CUTCLIFFE, SH
[J]. SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES, 1990, 15 (03) : 360 - 372
[7] Metabolomics 20years on: what have we learned and what hurdles remain?
Alseekh, Saleh
Fernie, Alisdair R.
[J]. PLANT JOURNAL, 2018, 94 (06): : 933 - 942
[8] Breathing Not Properly 10 Years Later What We Have Learned and What We Still Need to Learn
Maisel, Alan S.
Daniels, Lori B.
[J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 60 (04) : 277 - 282
[9] FIBROMYALGIA 20 YEARS LATER - WHAT HAVE WE REALLY ACCOMPLISHED
CARETTE, S
[J]. JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 1995, 22 (04) : 590 - 594
[10] Fukushima Future Studies: five years later, what have we learned?
Drollette, Dan, Jr.
[J]. BULLETIN OF THE ATOMIC SCIENTISTS, 2016, 72 (02) : 97 - 104

← 1 2 3 4 5 →