Multi-objective railway timetabling including energy-efficient train trajectory optimization

被引:3
|
作者
Scheepmaker, Gerben M. [1 ,2 ]
Goverde, Rob M. P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Netherlands Railways, Dept Performance Management & Innovat, POB 2025, NL-3500 HA Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Delft Univ Technol, Dept Transport & Planning, POB 5048, NL-2600 GA Delft, Netherlands
关键词
energy-efficient train timetabling; energy-efficient train control; blocking time theory; capacity consumption; robustness; TIME TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT; MICRO-MACRO APPROACH; CAPACITY CONSUMPTION; SYSTEMS; NETWORKS; INTEGRATION; OPERATION; FRAMEWORK; RECOVERY; MODELS;
D O I
10.18757/ejtir.2021.21.4.5453
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
Energy-efficient train driving is an important topic to railway undertakings (RUs) for sustainability and cost reduction. The timetable affects the possibilities for energy-efficient train driving by the amount of running time supplements, which is the topic of energy-efficient train timetabling (EETT). The scientific literature on EETT focuses mainly on the balance between total running time and energy consumption. However, in practice RUs consider a trade-off between the total running time, the infrastructure occupation and the timetable robustness, while energy efficiency is not considered. In this paper we consider a multiple-objective timetabling problem at a microscopic infrastructure level that adds energy consumption to the other three objectives. We approach the multiple-objective problem by a brute force search algorithm, where we use two different methods to compute the optimal solution: a weighted sum method and a distance metric method. We apply the method to a Dutch case study on the corridor between the stations Arnhem Central and Nijmegen with alternating Intercity and Sprinter trains, without intermediate overtaking possibilities. The results indicate that there is a balancing relationship between the total running time and energy consumption, without influencing the infrastructure occupation and robustness. The results of the 10 Pareto-optimal solutions show a variation of 5% for the total running time, 18% for the energy consumption, 0.3% for the extended cycle time, and 0.8% for the buffer time. The shortest running time leads to 18% more energy consumption than the longest running time with 5% more running time supplement. In both cases the extended cycle time and buffer time are almost constant. On the other hand, reducing the infrastructure occupation leads to homogenization of the timetable. Therefore, including energy consumption in the multiple-objective can be used to balance the trade-off between total running time and capacity consumption.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 42
页数:42
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multi-train trajectory optimization for energy-efficient timetabling
    Wang, Pengling
    Goverde, Rob M. P.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2019, 272 (02) : 621 - 635
  • [2] The Research of Train Energy-Efficient Operation Strategy Based on Multi-Objective Optimization
    Luo, Yunzhen
    An, Mi
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL, CONTROL AND AUTOMATION ENGINEERING (ECAE 2017), 2017, 140 : 153 - 159
  • [3] A Sparse Optimization Approach for Energy-Efficient Timetabling in Metro Railway Systems
    [J]. Li, Xiaoyu (16121607@bjtu.edu.cn), 1600, Hindawi Limited (2018):
  • [4] Review of energy-efficient train control and timetabling
    Scheepmaker, Gerben M.
    Goverde, Rob M. P.
    Kroon, Leo G.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2017, 257 (02) : 355 - 376
  • [5] A Sparse Optimization Approach for Energy-Efficient Timetabling in Metro Railway Systems
    Luo, Ziyan
    Li, Xiaoyu
    Xiu, Naihua
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION, 2018,
  • [6] GSOANR-based multi-objective train trajectory optimization
    Li, Wei
    Zhao, Sizhe
    Li, Kang
    Xing, Yi
    Li, Qian
    Yao, Wenhua
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RAIL TRANSPORTATION, 2024, 12 (04) : 733 - 748
  • [7] Integrated energy-efficient machining of rotary impellers and multi-objective optimization
    Serin, Gokberk
    Ozbayoglu, Murat
    Unver, Hakki Ozgur
    [J]. MATERIALS AND MANUFACTURING PROCESSES, 2020, 35 (04) : 478 - 490
  • [8] Multi-Objective Deployment Optimization of UAVs for Energy-Efficient Wireless Coverage
    Zhu, Xiumin
    Zhai, Linbo
    Li, Nianxin
    Li, Yumei
    Yang, Feng
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMMUNICATIONS, 2024, 72 (06) : 3587 - 3601
  • [9] Energy-efficient Optimization Method for Train Operation Combining Driving Strategy and Timetabling
    Sheng, Zhao
    Cai, Baigen
    Shangguan, Wei
    Wang, Jian
    [J]. Tiedao Xuebao/Journal of the China Railway Society, 2019, 41 (10): : 68 - 75
  • [10] Energy-efficient trajectory planning for an industrial robot using a multi-objective optimisation approach
    Liu, Sichao
    Wang, Yuquan
    Wang, Xi Vincent
    Wang, Lihui
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH SWEDISH PRODUCTION SYMPOSIUM (SPS 2018), 2018, 25 : 517 - 525