Laboratory Calibration and Field Validation of Soil Water Content and Salinity Measurements Using the 5TE Sensor

被引:14
|
作者
Zemni, Nessrine [1 ,2 ]
Bouksila, Fethi [1 ]
Persson, Magnus [3 ]
Slama, Fairouz [2 ]
Berndtsson, Ronny [3 ,4 ]
Bouhlila, Rachida [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Res Rural Engn Water & Forestry, Box 10, Ariana 2080, Tunisia
[2] Univ Tunis El Manar ENIT, Natl Engn Sch Tunis, Lab Modelling Hydraul & Environm, Box 37, Tunis 1002, Tunisia
[3] Lund Univ, Dept Water Resources Engn, Box 118, SE-22100 Lund, Sweden
[4] Lund Univ, Ctr Middle Eastern Studies, Box 201, SE-22100 Lund, Sweden
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
soil salinity; soil water content; FDR sensor; soil pore water electrical conductivity; sensor calibration and validation; real time monitoring; ELECTRICAL-CONDUCTIVITY; DIELECTRIC-PROPERTIES; CAPACITANCE; MOISTURE; TDR; PROBE;
D O I
10.3390/s19235272
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Capacitance sensors are widely used in agriculture for irrigation and soil management purposes. However, their use under saline conditions is a major challenge, especially for sensors operating with low frequency. Their dielectric readings are often biased by high soil electrical conductivity. New calculation approaches for soil water content (theta) and pore water electrical conductivity (ECp), in which apparent soil electrical conductivity (ECa) is included, have been suggested in recent research. However, these methods have neither been tested with low-cost capacitance probes such as the 5TE (70 MHz, Decagon Devices, Pullman, WA, USA) nor for field conditions. Thus, it is important to determine the performance of these approaches and to test the application range using the 5TE sensor for irrigated soils. For this purpose, sandy soil was collected from the Jemna oasis in southern Tunisia and four 5TE sensors were installed in the field at four soil depths. Measurements of apparent dielectric permittivity (Ka), ECa, and soil temperature were taken under different electrical conductivity of soil moisture solutions. Results show that, under field conditions, 5TE accuracy for theta estimation increased when considering the ECa effect. Field calibrated models gave better theta estimation (root mean square error (RMSE) = 0.03 m(3) m(-3)) as compared to laboratory experiments (RMSE = 0.06 m(3) m(-3)). For ECp prediction, two corrections of the Hilhorst model were investigated. The first approach, which considers the ECa effect on K' reading, failed to improve the Hilhorst model for ECp > 3 dS m(-1) for both laboratory and field conditions. However, the second approach, which considers the effect of ECa on the soil parameter K-0, increased the performance of the Hilhorst model and gave accurate measurements of ECp using the 5TE sensor for irrigated soil.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of the Decagon® 5TE Sensor as a Tool for Irrigation and Salinity Management in a Sandy Soil
    McCann, I. R.
    Fraj, M. B.
    Dakheel, A.
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING: NEW TECHNOLOGIES FOR SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION AND FOOD SECURITY, 2014, 1054 : 153 - 160
  • [2] An Investigation of the Accuracy of EC5 and 5TE Capacitance Sensors for Soil Moisture Monitoring in Urban Soils-Laboratory and Field Calibration
    Kanso, Tala
    Gromaire, Marie-Christine
    Ramier, David
    Dubois, Philippe
    Chebbo, Ghassan
    SENSORS, 2020, 20 (22) : 1 - 21
  • [3] Laboratory and Field Assessment of the Decagon 5TE and GS3 Sensors for Estimating Soil Water Content in Saline-Alkali Reclaimed Soils
    Son, Jae-Kwon
    Shin, Won-Tae
    Cho, Jae-Young
    COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 2017, 48 (19) : 2268 - 2279
  • [4] Laboratory and field assessment of the capacitance sensors Decagon 10HS and 5TE for estimating the water content of irrigated soils
    Visconti, Fernando
    Miguel de Paz, Jose
    Martinez, Delfina
    Jose Molina, Ma
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2014, 132 : 111 - 119
  • [5] A combined equation to estimate the soil pore-water electrical conductivity: calibration with the WET and 5TE sensors
    Visconti, Fernando
    Martinez, Delfina
    Jose Molina, Maria
    Ingelmo, Florencio
    Miguel de Paz, Jose
    SOIL RESEARCH, 2014, 52 (05) : 419 - 430
  • [6] Laboratory Calibration, In-Field Validation and Use of a Soil Penetrometer Measuring Cone Resistance and Water Content
    Topp, G. C.
    Lapen, D. R.
    Edwards, M. J.
    Young, G. D.
    VADOSE ZONE JOURNAL, 2003, 2 (04): : 633 - 641
  • [7] Laboratory Calibration of TDR Probes for Simultaneous of Measurements Soil Water Content and Electrical Conductivity
    Agah, A. Erfani
    Meire, P.
    De Deckere, E.
    COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 2019, 50 (13) : 1525 - 1540
  • [8] Field and Laboratory Evaluation of the CS655 Soil Water Content Sensor
    Caldwell, Todd G.
    Bongiovanni, Tara
    Cosh, Michael H.
    Halley, Chelsea
    Young, Michael H.
    VADOSE ZONE JOURNAL, 2018, 17 (01)
  • [9] Prediction of soil organic carbon content using field and laboratory measurements of soil color
    Wills, Skye A.
    Burras, C. Lee
    Sandor, Jonathan A.
    SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2007, 71 (02) : 380 - 388
  • [10] Field measurements of the water content in the top soil using a new capacitance sensor with a flat sensitive volume
    Ruth, B
    Munch, JC
    JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION AND SOIL SCIENCE, 2005, 168 (02) : 169 - 175