Economic impact of psoriasis treatment on the patient and on the National Health Service

被引:14
|
作者
Poyner, TF
Wall, ARJ
Adnitt, PI
Menday, AP
机构
[1] Leo Pharmaceut Prod, Princes Risborough HP27 9RR, Bucks, England
[2] Ctr Hlth, Woking, Surrey, England
[3] Queens Pk Med Ctr, Stockton On Tees, England
关键词
calcipotriol; dithranol; economic; psoriasis; treatment;
D O I
10.3109/09546639909055907
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Personal expenditure arising from psoriasis by patients with mild/moderate chronic plaque psoriasis was assessed before and at the end of randomized treatment in 122 patients treated with calcipotriol for a mean of 12 weeks and in 110 patients treated with dithranol for a mean of 11 weeks. Mean monthly expenditure before calcipotriol treatment was pound 15.23 (median pound 11.00) and was pound 13.54 (median pound 6.00) during calcipotriol treatment. Mean monthly expenditure before dithranol treatment was pound 15.97 (median pound 6.00) and was pound 16.89 (median pound 11.00) during dithranol treatment. When compared with calcipotriol treatment, dithranol treatment tended to result in increased monthly expenditure (P = 0.08), primarily on purchasing new clothing plaque before (P = 0.03) and new bed-linen/towels (P = 0.06). Healthcare resource use by the National Health Service (NHS), in respect of general practitioner (GP) and hospital consultation and treatment, was also assessed for two separate 6-month periods, before (period I) and after (period II) randomized treatment, for 147 calcipotriol-treated and 131 dithranol-treated patients. Patients selected their choice of treatment during period II. Mean healthcare resource use by the NHS in period I was pound 49.65 (median pound 25.79) and was pound 55.61 (median pound 21.39) in period II. Costs were primarily for GP consultations and treatment. The cost of treating psoriasis was greater to the patient than to the NHS.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 29
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Economic impact of biologics for the treatment of psoriasis
    Le Moigne, M.
    Lapeyre-Mestre, M.
    Bourrel, R.
    Molinier, L.
    Paul, C.
    Montastruc, J. L.
    Sommet, A.
    FUNDAMENTAL & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2013, 27 : 113 - 113
  • [2] Acamprosate in the treatment of alcoholism: a budget impact analysis for the National Health Service in Italy
    Colombo, Giorgio L.
    Di Matteo, Sergio
    Bruno, Giacomo
    SUBSTANCE ABUSE AND REHABILITATION, 2012, 3 : 73 - 79
  • [3] IMPACT ON ITALIAN NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE EXPENDITURE FOR THE TREATMENT OF VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM WITH RIVAROXABAN
    Roggeri, A.
    Roggeri, D. P.
    Pengo, V
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2015, 18 (07) : A384 - A384
  • [4] The UK National Health Service approach to the economic crisis
    Patel, Kiran C. R.
    Spilsbury, Peter
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE, 2010, 103 (04) : 123 - 124
  • [5] ECONOMIC APPRAISAL IN THE NATIONAL-HEALTH-SERVICE - A SURVEY
    LUDBROOK, A
    HEALTH POLICY, 1986, 6 (01) : 21 - 31
  • [6] The impact of ageing on expenditures in the National Health Service
    Seshamani, M
    Gray, A
    AGE AND AGEING, 2002, 31 (04) : 287 - 294
  • [7] Psoriasis and health economic impact in a developing country like Nepal
    Dutta, Shambu
    Joshi, Mandeep
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2024, 191
  • [8] Patient preferences for psoriasis treatments: impact of treatment experience
    Schaarschmidt, M. -L.
    Umar, N.
    Schmieder, A.
    Terris, D. D.
    Goebeler, M.
    Goerdt, S.
    Peitsch, W. K.
    JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY AND VENEREOLOGY, 2013, 27 (02) : 187 - 198
  • [9] Health economic burden that wounds impose on the National Health Service in the UK
    Guest, Julian F.
    Ayoub, Nadia
    Mcilwraith, Tracey
    Uchegbu, Ijeoma
    Gerrish, Alyson
    Weidlich, Diana
    Vowden, Kathryn
    Vowden, Peter
    BMJ OPEN, 2015, 5 (12):
  • [10] Administration Service of systemic Setroids in Psoriasis - economic Implications for the inpatient Treatment
    Herger, S.
    Glaenz, T.
    Allmacher, C.
    Amon, U.
    JOURNAL DER DEUTSCHEN DERMATOLOGISCHEN GESELLSCHAFT, 2011, 9 : 192 - 193