Comparative Evaluation of Mobile Forensic Tools

被引:1
|
作者
Alhassan, J. K. [1 ]
Oguntoye, R. T. [1 ]
Misra, Sanjay [2 ]
Adewumi, Adewole [2 ]
Maskeliunas, Rytis [3 ]
Damasevicius, Robertas [3 ]
机构
[1] Fed Univ Technol, Minna, Nigeria
[2] Covenant Univ, Otta, Nigeria
[3] Kaunas Univ Technol, Kaunas, Lithuania
关键词
Mobile; Mobile phone; Smartphone; Forensics; Digital investigation; Digital evidence;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-319-73450-7_11
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The rapid rise in the technology today has brought to limelight mobile devices which are now being used as a tool to commit crime. Therefore, proper steps need to be ensured for Confidentiality, Integrity, Authenticity and legal acquisition of any form of digital evidence from the mobile devices. This study evaluates some mobile forensic tools that were developed mainly for mobile devices memory and SIM cards. An experiment was designed with five android phones with different Operating System. Four tools were used to find out the capability and efficiency of the tools when used on the sampled phones. This would help the forensic investigator to know the type of tools that will be suitable for each phone to be investigated for acquiring digital evidence. The evaluation result showed that AccessData FTK imager and Paraben device seizure performs better than Encase and Mobiledit. The experimental result shows that, Encase could detect the unallocated space on the mobile deice but could retrieve an deleted data.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 114
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative Study of Mobile Forensic Tools
    Agrawal, Animesh Kumar
    Khatri, Pallavi
    Sinha, Sumitra Ranjan
    [J]. ADVANCES IN DATA AND INFORMATION SCIENCES, VOL 1, 2018, 38 : 39 - 47
  • [2] Comparative Analysis of Commercial and Open Source Mobile Device Forensic Tools
    Padmanabhan, Radhika
    Lobo, Karen
    Ghelani, Mrunali
    Sujan, Dhanika
    Shirole, Mahesh
    [J]. 2016 NINTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONTEMPORARY COMPUTING (IC3), 2016, : 278 - 283
  • [3] A Study of Mobile Forensic Tools Evaluation on Android-Based LINE Messenger
    Riadi, Imam
    Fadlil, Abdul
    Fauzan, Ammar
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED COMPUTER SCIENCE AND APPLICATIONS, 2018, 9 (10) : 201 - 206
  • [4] Comparative analysis on integrated digital forensic tools for digital forensic investigation
    Lee, Jae-ung
    Soh, Woo-young
    [J]. 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING 2019 (ICAME 2019), 2020, 834
  • [5] Forensic Tools for Mobile Phone Subscriber Identity Modules
    Jansen, Wayne
    Ayers, Rick
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DIGITAL FORENSICS SECURITY AND LAW, 2006, 1 (02) : 75 - 94
  • [6] A comparative evaluation of CASE tools
    Post, G
    Kagan, A
    Keim, RT
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE, 1998, 44 (02) : 87 - 96
  • [7] An Evaluation of Mobile Health Application Tools
    Sama, Preethi R.
    Eapen, Zubin J.
    Weinfurt, Kevin P.
    Shah, Bimal R.
    Schulman, Kevin A.
    [J]. JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH, 2014, 2 (02):
  • [8] Methodologies and Forensic Analysis Tools on Android Mobile Devices: A Systematic Literature Review
    Cristian, Pozo-Calderon
    Hernan, Tones-Carrion
    Rene, Guaman-Quinche
    Francisco, Alvarez-Pineda
    Cristian, Narvaez-Guillen
    [J]. 2020 15TH IBERIAN CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES (CISTI'2020), 2020,
  • [9] Payment card forensic analysis: From concepts to desktop and mobile analysis tools
    Souvignet, T.
    Hatin, J.
    Maqua, F.
    Tesniere, D.
    Leger, P.
    Hormiere, R.
    [J]. DIGITAL INVESTIGATION, 2014, 11 (03) : 143 - 153
  • [10] Mobile Application testing tools and their challenges: A comparative study
    Arif, Khawaja Sarmad
    Ali, Usman
    [J]. 2019 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTING, MATHEMATICS AND ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGIES (ICOMET), 2019,