Industry 4.0 Development Multi-Criteria Assessment: An Integrated Fuzzy DEMATEL, ANP and VIKOR Methodology

被引:18
|
作者
Sadeghi-Niaraki, Abolghasem [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] KN Toosi Univ Technol, Fac Geodesy & Geomat Engn, Geoinformat Technol Ctr Excellence, Tehran 19697, Iran
[2] Sejong Univ, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Seoul 05006, South Korea
关键词
Industry; 4; 0; multi criteria assessment framework; fuzzy; DEMATEL; ANP; VIKOR; MODEL; PERSPECTIVE; REVOLUTION; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2965979
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Industry 4.0 (I4.0) includes an important regeneration of production and management systems within manufacturing, where the majority of the procedures will be entirely or partially automated. However, there are insufficient research studies related to I4.0 development assessment based on the various requirement factors to enable countries to measure their own conditions and to make future national strategies and roadmaps for their activities in this field. Thus, this paper develops a comprehensive framework to assess the countries' readiness level in I4.0 development. The research is conducted in several steps. First, the main required clusters and their criteria of I4.0 development assessment such as technological, social, economic, political and environmental clusters are determined. Second, the importance of the clusters and their criteria are specified using the Fuzzy DEMATLE and Fuzzy ANP techniques. Third, the countries are ranked using the VIKOR technique. In this study, the conditions of I4.0 development for South Korea, the United States, China, Iran, Japan, and Germany are assessed based on the proposed framework. The ranking results show the United States, Germany, and Japan got ranked first to third, based on the obtained VIKOR index, 0.000, 0.528, and 0.559, respectively. The framework is verified using sensitivity analysis and validated based on the countries' existing plans. The evaluation results are rescannable. The result shows that the United States, Germany, Japan, and South Korea got high scores especially in the technological cluster and also some challenges in the criteria related to the social and cultural clusters. On the other hand, China and Iran got the highest score in the labor force criterion of the social cluster (0.023) and the intercultural understanding criterion of the cultural cluster (0.006), respectively, however, they need to strengthen the technological cluster "to be hopeful of having" an active role in future global marketing.
引用
收藏
页码:23689 / 23704
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Fuzzy multi-criteria lifecycle system maturity decision making based on an integrated Fuzzy AHP and VIKOR methodology
    Zhang, Haiqing
    Bouras, Abdelaziz
    Ouzrout, Yacine
    Sekhari, Aicha
    [J]. 2014 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (ICCST), 2014,
  • [2] Multi-Criteria Decision Making for PLM Maturity Analysis based on an Integrated Fuzzy AHP and VIKOR Methodology
    Yu, Xi
    Zhang, Haiqing
    Bouras, Abdelaziz
    Ouzrout, Yacine
    Sekhari, Aicha
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS, 2018, 17 (02) : 155 - 179
  • [3] A Multi-Criteria Approach for FMEA in Product Development in Industry 4.0
    de Andrade, Jose M. M.
    Leite, Athon F. C. S. de M.
    Canciglieri, Matheus B.
    Szejka, Anderson L.
    Loures, Eduardo de F. R.
    Canciglieri Junior, Osiris
    [J]. TRANSDISCIPLINARY ENGINEERING FOR COMPLEX SOCIO-TECHNICAL SYSTEMS - REAL-LIFE APPLICATIONS, 2020, 12 : 311 - 320
  • [4] Multi-criteria decision analysis by using fuzzy VIKOR
    Wang, Tien-Chin
    Liang, Jia-Ling
    Ho, Chun-Yen
    [J]. 2006 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SERVICE SYSTEMS AND SERVICE MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1 AND 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, : 901 - 906
  • [5] A multi-criteria decision-making methodology on the selection of facility location: fuzzy ANP
    Ozdagoglu, Askin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 59 (5-8): : 787 - 803
  • [6] A multi-criteria decision-making methodology on the selection of facility location: fuzzy ANP
    Aşkın Özdağoğlu
    [J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2012, 59 : 787 - 803
  • [7] Multi expert and multi criteria evaluation of sectoral investments for sustainable development: An integrated fuzzy AHP, VIKOR/DEA methodology
    Suganthi, L.
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2018, 43 : 144 - 156
  • [8] Mass customization model in food industry using industry 4.0 standard with fuzzy-based multi-criteria decision making methodology
    Simon, Janos
    Trojanova, Monika
    Zbihlej, Jozef
    Sarosi, Jozsef
    [J]. ADVANCES IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 10 (03):
  • [9] An integrated multi-criteria decision making methodology for health technology assessment
    Karatas, Mumtaz
    Karacan, Ilknur
    Tozan, Hakan
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 12 (04) : 504 - 534
  • [10] A multi-criteria decision tool for FMEA in the context of product development and industry 4.0
    de Andrade, Jose M. M.
    Leite, Athon F. C. S. de M.
    Canciglieri, Matheus B.
    Szejka, Anderson L.
    Loures, Eduardo de F. R.
    Canciglieri, Osiris
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING, 2022, 35 (01) : 36 - 49