Digital and online symptom checkers and health assessment/triage services for urgent health problems: systematic review

被引:106
|
作者
Chambers, Duncan [1 ]
Cantrell, Anna J. [1 ]
Johnson, Maxine [1 ]
Preston, Louise [1 ]
Baxter, Susan K. [1 ]
Booth, Andrew [1 ]
Turner, Janette [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Sch Hlth & Related Res, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2019年 / 9卷 / 08期
关键词
urgent care; symptom checkers; systematic reviews; WEB-BASED TRIAGE; CARE; LIMITATIONS; DOCTORS; ADVICE;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027743
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives In England, the NHS111 service provides assessment and triage by telephone for urgent health problems. A digital version of this service has recently been introduced. We aimed to systematically review the evidence on digital and online symptom checkers and similar services. Design Systematic review. Data sources We searched Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Health Management Information Consortium, Web of Science and ACM Digital Library up to April 2018, supplemented by phrase searches for known symptom checkers and citation searching of key studies. Eligibility criteria Studies of any design that evaluated a digital or online symptom checker or health assessment service for people seeking advice about an urgent health problem. Data extraction and synthesis Data extraction and quality assessment (using the Cochrane Collaboration version of QUADAS for diagnostic accuracy studies and the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute tool for observational studies) were done by one reviewer with a sample checked for accuracy and consistency. We performed a narrative synthesis of the included studies structured around pre-defined research questions and key outcomes. Results We included 29 publications (27 studies). Evidence on patient safety was weak. Diagnostic accuracy varied between different systems but was generally low. Algorithm-based triage tended to be more risk averse than that of health professionals. There was very limited evidence on patients' compliance with online triage advice. Study participants generally expressed high levels of satisfaction, although in mainly uncontrolled studies. Younger and more highly educated people were more likely to use these services. Conclusions The English 'digital 111' service has been implemented against a background of uncertainty around the likely impact on important outcomes. The health system may need to respond to short-term changes and/or shifts in demand. The popularity of online and digital services with younger and more educated people has implications for health equity. PROSPERO registration number CRD42018093564.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Triage and Diagnostic Accuracy of Online Symptom Checkers: Systematic Review
    Riboli-Sasco, Eva
    El-Osta, Austen
    Alaa, Aos
    Webber, Iman
    Karki, Manisha
    El Asmar, Marie Line
    Purohit, Katie
    Painter, Annabelle
    Hayhoe, Benedict
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2023, 25
  • [2] Evaluation of Baseline Health Literacy for Diagnostic and Triage Accuracy of Online Symptom Checkers for Gastrointestinal Illnesses
    Berry, Andrew C.
    Berry, Bruce
    Wang, Bin
    Mulekar, Madhuri
    Kanar, Ozdemir
    Nakshabendi, Rahman
    Berry, Nicholas
    Kichler, Kandace
    Sharma, Vicki
    Kishore, Varsha
    Elden, Andrew C.
    Nafisi, Shirin
    Nakshabandi, Ahmad
    Savani, Umair
    Pernenkil, Vikash
    Rifai, Fareed
    Sturdivant, Tyler L.
    Matese, Morgan
    Sperling, Alexandra
    Haas, Carly H.
    Harris, Ciel
    Cutrell, Patrick K.
    Turner, Justin
    Gunn, Brady
    Cash, Brooks D.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 111 : S435 - S435
  • [3] Will online symptom checkers improve health care in Australia?
    Dunn, Adam G.
    [J]. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2020, 212 (11) : 512 - 512
  • [4] The diagnostic and triage accuracy of digital and online symptom checker tools: a systematic review
    William Wallace
    Calvin Chan
    Swathikan Chidambaram
    Lydia Hanna
    Fahad Mujtaba Iqbal
    Amish Acharya
    Pasha Normahani
    Hutan Ashrafian
    Sheraz R. Markar
    Viknesh Sounderajah
    Ara Darzi
    [J]. npj Digital Medicine, 5
  • [5] The diagnostic and triage accuracy of digital and online symptom checker tools: a systematic review
    Wallace, William
    Chan, Calvin
    Chidambaram, Swathikan
    Hanna, Lydia
    Iqbal, Fahad Mujtaba
    Acharya, Amish
    Normahani, Pasha
    Ashrafian, Hutan
    Markar, Sheraz R.
    Sounderajah, Viknesh
    Darzi, Ara
    [J]. NPJ DIGITAL MEDICINE, 2022, 5 (01)
  • [6] Health Professionals' Experiences of the Benefits and Challenges of Online Symptom Checkers
    Kujala, Sari
    Horhammer, Iiris
    Hanninen-Ervasti, Riitta
    Heponiemi, Tarja
    [J]. DIGITAL PERSONALIZED HEALTH AND MEDICINE, 2020, 270 : 966 - 970
  • [7] A scoping review on the use and usefulness of online symptom checkers and triage systems: How to proceed?
    Pairon, Anthony
    Philips, Hilde
    Verhoeven, Veronique
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2023, 9
  • [8] Strengths Assessment in Mental Health Services: A Systematic Review
    Chen, Qi-Rong
    Young, Daniel Kim-Wan
    Ng, Yat-Nam Petrus
    Cheng, Daphne Yi-Ting
    Zhang, Wen-Feng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASED SOCIAL WORK, 2022, 19 (06) : 746 - 775
  • [9] Digital health for cancer symptom management in palliative medicine: systematic review
    Hamdoune, Meryem
    Jounaidi, Khaoula
    Ammari, Nada
    Gantare, Abdellah
    [J]. BMJ SUPPORTIVE & PALLIATIVE CARE, 2024,
  • [10] Search Engines vs. Symptom Checkers: A Comparison of their Effectiveness for Online Health Advice
    Cross, Sebastian
    Mourad, Ahmed
    Zuccon, Guido
    Koopman, Bevan
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE WORLD WIDE WEB CONFERENCE 2021 (WWW 2021), 2021, : 206 - 216