A probabilistic model for distinguishing between sheep and goat postcranial remains

被引:13
|
作者
Wolfhagen, Jesse [1 ]
Price, Max D. [2 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Stony Brook, Interdept Doctoral Program Anthropol Sci, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Dept Anthropol, Cambridge, England
关键词
CLASSIFICATION; SIZE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jasrep.2017.02.022
中图分类号
K85 [文物考古];
学科分类号
0601 ;
摘要
Distinguishing morphologically-similar taxa is a perennial problem for zooarchaeologists. As an example, zooarchaeological methods to distinguish sheep and goat bones are limited by the fact that diagnostic traits are not exclusive to each species. For this reason, we argue that sheep/goat bones should be considered probabilistically, not absolutely. That is, each bone should be considered as falling along a spectrum from sheep to goat. To that end, we present a probabilistic method for assigning taxonomic status to sheep/goat postcranial specimens. Suites of diagnostic traits present on each specimen are translated into probabilities, which we then use in simulations to estimate the number of sheep and goat bones. We apply our model to two assemblages: 'Ain Dara (Syria) and Tell Sakhariya (Iraq). We evaluate the effectiveness of standard diagnostic traits, finding that distal tibias and second phalanges particularly problematic to identify to species. In addition, our probabilistic method improves the reliability and replicability of sheep/goat identifications in zooarchaeological assemblages by making explicit the diagnostic criteria used and providing clear standards that other projects can follow and thus be directly compared. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:625 / 631
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A morphometric system to distinguish sheep and goat postcranial bones
    Salvagno, Lenny
    Albarella, Umberto
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (06):
  • [2] Distinguishing between archaeological sheep and goat bones using a single collagen peptide
    Buckley, Mike
    Kansa, Sarah Whitcher
    Howard, Sarah
    Campbell, Stuart
    Thomas-Oates, Jane
    Collins, Matthew
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2010, 37 (01) : 13 - 20
  • [3] INTERSPECIFIC CHIMAERISM BETWEEN SHEEP AND GOAT
    FEHILLY, CB
    WILLADSEN, SM
    TUCKER, EM
    [J]. NATURE, 1984, 307 (5952) : 634 - 636
  • [4] Comparison of N excretion between Goat and Sheep
    Choirunnisa, R.
    Luthfi, N.
    Prima, A.
    Restitrisnani, V
    Subagyo, W.
    Arifin, M.
    Rianto, E.
    Purnomoadi, A.
    [J]. 1ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF ANIMAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (ICAST) 2018, 2019, 247
  • [5] Distinguishing between sheep and goat in archaeological fumiers through faecal lipid biomarkers: The case of Belmaco Cave (Canary Islands, Spain)
    Fernandez-Palacios, Enrique
    Herrera-Herrera, Antonio, V
    Gilson, Simon -Pierre
    Eguez, Natalia
    Jambrina-Enriquez, Margarita
    Santana, Jonathan
    Mallol, Carolina
    [J]. QUATERNARY INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 683 : 135 - 144
  • [6] SHEEP AND GOAT BREEDING IN ROMANIA - BETWEEN TRADITION AND CONSUMPTION
    Chiurciu, Irina-Adriana
    Zaharia, Iuliana
    Fintineru, Gina
    Dinu, Toma Adrian
    Soare, Elena
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC PAPERS-SERIES MANAGEMENT ECONOMIC ENGINEERING IN AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, 2023, 23 (02) : 135 - 144
  • [7] A presentation of the differences between the sheep and goat genetic maps
    Maddox, JF
    [J]. GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2005, 37 : S1 - S10
  • [8] A presentation of the differences between the sheep and goat genetic maps
    Jillian F Maddox
    [J]. Genetics Selection Evolution, 37 (Suppl 1)
  • [9] The Contribution of the Sheep and the Goat Model to the Study of Ovarian Ageing
    Montenegro, Luis
    Magalhaes, Paulo
    Guerreiro, Adriana Costa
    Brandao, Catarina
    Pinto, Anabela
    Almeida, Henrique
    Martins-Bessa, Ana
    Silva, Elisabete
    [J]. BIOLOGY-BASEL, 2023, 12 (02):
  • [10] ANTIGENIC RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE GOAT POX VIRUS AND THE KENYA SHEEP AND GOAT POX VIRUS
    KALPANA, G
    KRISHNAMURTHY, GV
    RAGHAVAN, R
    [J]. INDIAN VETERINARY JOURNAL, 1995, 72 (07): : 675 - 679