Information cascades in online reading: an empirical investigation of panel data

被引:13
|
作者
Liu, Qihua [1 ]
Zhang, Liyi [2 ]
机构
[1] Jiangxi Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Informat Technol, Nanchang, Peoples R China
[2] Wuhan Univ, Sch Informat Management, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Electronic publishing; Chinese; User studies; Electronic books; Qualitative methods; WORD-OF-MOUTH; E-BOOK USAGE; HERD BEHAVIOR; NETWORK EXTERNALITIES; TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION; SOCIAL-INFLUENCE; MODEL; USERS; BOX; DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1108/LHT-06-2014-0052
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine information cascades in the context of users' e-book reading behavior and differentiate it from alternative factors that lead to herd behavior, such as network externalities and word-of-mouth effects. Design/methodology/approach - This paper constructed panel data using information concerning 226 e-books in 30 consecutive days from Sina. com's reading channel (Book.Sina.com.cn) from October 2, 2013, to October 31, 2013 of the same year in China. A multinomial logit market-share model was employed. Findings - E-books' ranking has a significant impact on their market share, as predicted by informational cascades theory. Higher ranking e-books' clicks will see a greater increase as a result of an increase in clicks ranking. Due to the information cascades effect, review volume had no impact on the market share of popular e-books. Total votes had a powerful impact on the market share of e-books, showing that once information cascade occurred, it could be enhanced by the increase in total votes. The total clicks of e-books had a significant impact on their market share, suggesting that online reading behavior would be influenced by network externalities. Practical implications - As important information, the ranking or popularity of e-books should be carefully considered by online reading web sites, publishers, and authors. It is not enough for the authors and publishers of e-books to simply pay attention to the content. They should design their marketing strategies to allow network externalities and informational cascades to work for them, not against them. Online reading web sites should also focus on eliminating certain behavior, such as "brush clicks" and "brush votes," in order to prevent an undesirable information cascade due to false information. Originality/value - To the best of the knowledge, this is the first study to examine information cascades in the context of users' e-book reading behavior. Moreover, this study can help other researchers by utilizing a large sample of daily data from one of the earliest online reading platforms in China.
引用
收藏
页码:687 / 705
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The interaction effects of information cascades, word of mouth and recommendation systems on online reading behavior: an empirical investigation
    Qihua Liu
    Xiaoyu Zhang
    Liyi Zhang
    Yang Zhao
    [J]. Electronic Commerce Research, 2019, 19 : 521 - 547
  • [2] The interaction effects of information cascades, word of mouth and recommendation systems on online reading behavior: an empirical investigation
    Liu, Qihua
    Zhang, Xiaoyu
    Zhang, Liyi
    Zhao, Yang
    [J]. ELECTRONIC COMMERCE RESEARCH, 2019, 19 (03) : 521 - 547
  • [3] Do online reviews matter? - An empirical investigation of panel data
    Duan, Wenjing
    Gu, Bin
    Whinston, Andrew B.
    [J]. DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2008, 45 (04) : 1007 - 1016
  • [4] The influence of information cascades on online reading behaviors of free and paid e-books
    Liu, Qihua
    Zhang, Xiaoyu
    Li, Yiran
    [J]. LIBRARY & INFORMATION SCIENCE RESEARCH, 2020, 42 (01)
  • [5] Political determinants of fiscal transparency: a panel data empirical investigation
    Cicatiello, Lorenzo
    De Simone, Elina
    Gaeta, Giuseppe Lucio
    [J]. ECONOMICS OF GOVERNANCE, 2017, 18 (04) : 315 - 336
  • [6] Political determinants of fiscal transparency: a panel data empirical investigation
    Lorenzo Cicatiello
    Elina De Simone
    Giuseppe Lucio Gaeta
    [J]. Economics of Governance, 2017, 18 : 315 - 336
  • [7] What makes people happy? An empirical investigation of panel data
    Kim, Rae Yule
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2021, 28 (02) : 91 - 94
  • [8] Does online observational learning matter? Empirical evidence from panel data
    Lu, Jian
    Su, Xiang
    Diao, Yajing
    Wang, Nianxin
    Zhou, Bin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RETAILING AND CONSUMER SERVICES, 2021, 60
  • [9] An empirical investigation of online review helpfulness: A big data perspective
    Choi, Hoon S.
    Leon, Steven
    [J]. DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2020, 139
  • [10] CEO Compensation and Firm Performance: an Empirical Investigation of UK Panel Data
    Ozkan, Neslihan
    [J]. EUROPEAN FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2011, 17 (02) : 260 - 285