Evaluation of alternative land-use scenarios using an ecosystem services-based strategic environmental assessment approach

被引:17
|
作者
Nijhum, Farzana [1 ]
Westbrook, Cherie [1 ]
Noble, Bram [1 ]
Belcher, Ken [2 ]
Lloyd-Smith, Patrick [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Saskatchewan, Dept Geog & Planning, 117 Sci Pl, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5C8, Canada
[2] Univ Saskatchewan, Dept Agr & Resource Econ, 51 Campus Dr, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A8, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Ecosystem services; Strategic environmental assessment; Land use planning; Choice experiment; Alternative future land use; Urban wetlands; CHOICE EXPERIMENT; WETLAND CONSERVATION; IMPACT ASSESSMENT; PREFERENCE; SEA; INTEGRATION; VALUATION; QUALITY; DESIGN; VALUES;
D O I
10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105540
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Ecosystem services valuation is not new, but few approaches have been developed to support ecosystem service consideration at the strategic level of futures-based planning. This paper demonstrates a practical, strategic environmental assessment approach to incorporate the valuation of ecosystem services in a futures-based assessment to support land use planning decisions for urban ecological areas. The application is based on the Northeast Swale, a valued natural area consisting of prairie grasslands and ephemeral wetlands in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada, which is subject to the cumulative pressures of urban development. Land use attributes or end points are adopted as proxies for ecosystem services to simplify the complexity of ecosystem services and to ensure outcomes that are practical and relevant to those who make land use decisions. The value of land use attributes is assessed using a choice experiment that incorporates visual interpretations of alternative land use futures, from which residents' marginal willingness to pay for attributes are determined. Using compensating surplus values, tradeoffs between alternative future scenarios are explored and a range of preferred land use futures identified that depict different land use attributes and thus the suite of benefits residents derive from ecosystem services. Lessons are discussed for improved integration of ecosystem services valuation in strategic land use planning, and for translating complex ecosystem service concepts into practical directions for urban residents and for those responsible for land use policy and planning decisions.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Developing an Ecosystem Services-Based Approach for Land Use Planning
    Cai, Wenbo
    Jiang, Wei
    Cai, Yongli
    [J]. LAND, 2021, 10 (04)
  • [2] Benefits and challenges of using an Assessment of Ecosystem Services approach in land-use planning
    Forkink, Annet
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 60 (11) : 2071 - 2084
  • [3] Ecosystem services-based land planning for environmental impact avoidance
    Nin, Mariana
    Soutullo, Alvaro
    Rodriguez-Gallego, Lorena
    Di Minin, Enrico
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2016, 17 : 172 - 184
  • [4] Strategic environmental assessment of land-use planning in China
    Tang, T
    Zhu, T
    Xu, H
    Wu, J
    [J]. Environmental Informatics, Proceedings, 2005, : 41 - 51
  • [5] Strategic environmental assessment in Australian land-use planning
    Marsden, Simon
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL AND PLANNING LAW JOURNAL, 2013, 30 (05):
  • [6] Land-use elements and attributed ecosystem services: an archetype approach to land-use evaluation at the German North Sea coast
    Karrasch, Leena
    Klenke, Thomas
    Kleyer, Michael
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2019, 24 (02):
  • [7] Identifying ecological production functions for use in ecosystem services-based environmental risk assessment of chemicals
    Faber, J. H.
    Marshall, S.
    Brown, A. R.
    Holt, A.
    van den Brink, P. J.
    Maltby, L.
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 791
  • [8] A protocol for an intercomparison of biodiversity and ecosystem services models using harmonized land-use and climate scenarios
    Kim, Hyejin
    Rosa, Isabel M. D.
    Alkemade, Rob
    Leadley, Paul
    Hurtt, George
    Popp, Alexander
    van Vuuren, Detlef P.
    Anthoni, Peter
    Arneth, Almut
    Baisero, Daniele
    Caton, Emma
    Chaplin-Kramer, Rebecca
    Chini, Louise
    De Palma, Adriana
    Di Fulvio, Fulvio
    Di Marco, Moreno
    Espinoza, Felipe
    Ferrier, Simon
    Fujimori, Shinichiro
    Gonzalez, Ricardo E.
    Gueguen, Maya
    Guerra, Carlos
    Harfoot, Mike
    Harwood, Thomas D.
    Hasegawa, Tomoko
    Haverd, Vanessa
    Havlik, Petr
    Hellweg, Stefanie
    Hill, Samantha L. L.
    Hirata, Akiko
    Hoskins, Andrew J.
    Janse, Jan H.
    Jetz, Walter
    Johnson, Justin A.
    Krause, Andreas
    Leclere, David
    Martins, Ines S.
    Matsui, Tetsuya
    Merow, Cory
    Obersteiner, Michael
    Ohashi, Haruka
    Poulter, Benjamin
    Purvis, Andy
    Quesada, Benjamin
    Rondinini, Carlo
    Schipper, Aafke M.
    Sharp, Richard
    Takahashi, Kiyoshi
    Thuiller, Wilfried
    Titeux, Nicolas
    [J]. GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 11 (11) : 4537 - 4562
  • [9] Land-use Dynamic and Ecosystem Services Valuation: Guidelines for Environmental Policies
    Andrade, Daniel Caixeta
    Romeiro, Ademar Ribeiro
    Ramos Fasiaben, Maria do Carmo
    Garcia, Junior Ruiz
    [J]. DESENVOLVIMENTO E MEIO AMBIENTE, 2012, 25 : 53 - 71