Treating Class II malocclusion in children. Vertical skeletal effects of high-pull or low-pull headgear during comprehensive orthodontic treatment and retention

被引:8
|
作者
Antonarakis, G. S. [1 ]
Kiliaridis, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Geneva, Sch Dent, Dept Orthodont, CH-1205 Geneva, Switzerland
关键词
angle Class II; cephalometry; extraoral traction appliances; malocclusion; MASSETER MUSCLE THICKNESS; CERVICAL HEADGEAR; CRANIOFACIAL MORPHOLOGY; GROWTH; FORCES; DIMENSION; FACE;
D O I
10.1111/ocr.12062
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
ObjectivesTo evaluate, in Class II malocclusion children, vertical skeletal changes occurring with high- and low-pull headgear during non-extraction comprehensive orthodontic treatment, and retention. Setting and sample populationTwo groups of thirty Class II malocclusion children (mean age 10.8years) who had undergone non-extraction comprehensive orthodontic treatment with either high- or low-pull headgear and fixed appliances. Material and MethodsRetrospective longitudinal study, where pre-treatment, post-treatment and at least 2year post-retention lateral cephalometric radiographs were analyzed. Comparisons were made concerning changes during treatment and retention in high- or low-pull headgear-treated children. Correlation analyses were carried out investigating changes in vertical cephalometric parameters and pre-treatment vertical facial pattern or type of headgear used. ResultsDuring treatment, sagittal relationships improved in all children and remained stable during retention. Vertically, in both high- and low-pull headgear groups, the intermaxillary angle as well as the maxillary and mandibular plane angles did not show statistically significant changes during treatment or retention, and large variation was seen between patients. When pooling the whole patient sample, change in the vertical facial pattern was independent of the pre-treatment vertical facial pattern or type of headgear used. ConclusionWhen treating Class II malocclusion children non-extraction with high- or low-pull headgear and fixed appliances, changes in vertical skeletal relationships demonstrate wide variation, both during treatment and retention. Dentoalveolar changes brought about by these appliancesmay not be able to make a predictable difference in vertical skeletal patterns of growing patients.
引用
收藏
页码:86 / 95
页数:10
相关论文
共 8 条
  • [1] DENTAL AND ORTHOPEDIC EFFECTS OF HIGH-PULL HEADGEAR IN TREATMENT OF CLASS-II, DIVISION-1 MALOCCLUSION
    FIROUZ, M
    ZERNIK, J
    NANDA, R
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1992, 102 (03) : 197 - 205
  • [2] Two-phase treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion with the combination of the Twin-block appliance and high-pull headgear
    Lv, Yan
    Yan, Bin
    Wang, Lin
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2012, 142 (02) : 246 - 255
  • [3] Long-term skeletal effects of high-pull headgear followed by fixed appliances for the treatment of Class II malocclusions
    Bilbo, E. Erin
    Marshall, Steven D.
    Southard, Karin A.
    Allareddy, Verrasathpurush
    Holton, Nathan
    Thames, Allyn M.
    Otsby, Marlene S.
    Southard, Thomas E.
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2018, 88 (05) : 530 - 537
  • [4] Effect of cervical or high-pull headgear on the vertical dimensions of Class II Division 1 patients response
    Zervas, Erin Dobbins
    Galang-Boquiren, Maria Therese S.
    Viana, Maria Grace Costa
    Kusnoto, Budi
    Oppermann, Nelson
    Sanchez, Flavio
    Romero, Enrique Garcia
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2017, 152 (01) : 10 - 11
  • [5] Comparison of cephalometric changes in Class II growing patients with increased vertical dimension after high-pull and cervical headgear treatment
    Sambataro, S.
    Rossi, O.
    Bocchieri, S.
    Fastuca, R.
    Oppermann, N.
    Levrini, L.
    Cicciu, M.
    Caprioglio, A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, 2023, 24 (01) : 36 - 41
  • [6] Change in the vertical dimension of Class II Division 1 patients after use of cervical or high-pull headgear
    Zervas, Erin Dobbins
    Galang-Boquiren, Maria Therese S.
    Obrez, Ales
    Costa Viana, Maria Grace
    Oppermann, Nelson
    Sanchez, Flavio
    Romero, Enrique Garcia
    Kusnoto, Budi
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2016, 150 (05) : 771 - 781
  • [7] Effects of Class II activator and Class II activator high-pull headgear combination on the mandible: A 3-dimensional finite element stress analysis study
    Ulusoy, Cagri
    Darendeliler, Niluefer
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2008, 133 (04) : 490.e9 - 490.e15
  • [8] Long term stability of a high-angle skeletal Class II open bite treated with high-pull headgear and modified transpalatal arch: A case report
    Sabri, Roy
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHODONTICS, 2023, 21 (01)