Maps of current density using density-functional methods

被引:43
|
作者
Soncini, A. [1 ]
Teale, A. M. [1 ]
Helgaker, T. [1 ]
De Proft, F. [2 ]
Tozer, D. J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oslo, Ctr Theoret & Computat Chem, N-0315 Oslo, Norway
[2] Vrije Univ Brussels, Fac Wetenschappen, Eenheid Algemene Chem ALGC, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
[3] Univ Durham, Dept Chem, Durham DH1 3LE, England
来源
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS | 2008年 / 129卷 / 07期
关键词
D O I
10.1063/1.2969104
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The performance of several density-functional theory (DFT) methods for the calculation of current densities induced by a uniform magnetic field is examined. Calculations are performed using the BLYP and KT3 generalized-gradient approximations, together with the B3LYP hybrid functional. For the latter, both conventional and optimized effective potential (OEP) approaches are used. Results are also determined from coupled-cluster singles-and-doubles (CCSD) electron densities by a DFT constrained search procedure using the approach of Wu and Yang (WY). The current densities are calculated within the CTOCD-DZ2 distributed origin approach. Comparisons are made with results from Hartree-Fock (HF) theory. Several small molecules for which correlation is known to be especially important in the calculation of magnetic response properties are considered-namely, O(3), CO, PN, and H(2)CO. As examples of aromatic and antiaromatic systems, benzene and planarized cyclooctatetraene molecules are considered, with specific attention paid to the ring current phenomenon and its Kohn-Sham orbital origin. Finally, the o-benzyne molecule is considered as a computationally challenging case. The HF and DFT induced current maps show qualitative differences, while among the DFT methods the maps show a similar qualitative structure. To assess quantitative differences in the calculated current densities with different methods, the maximal moduli of the induced current densities are compared and integration of the current densities to yield shielding constants is performed. In general, the maximal modulus is reduced in moving from HF to B3LYP and BLYP, and further reduced in moving to KT3, OEP(B3LYP), and WY(CCSD). The latter three methods offer the most accurate shielding constants in comparison with both experimental and ab initio data and hence the more reliable route to DFT calculation of induced current density in molecules. (C) 2008 American Institute of Physics.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Spin-current density-functional methods
    Goerling, Andreas
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2006, 231
  • [2] Revisiting density-functional theory of the total current density
    Laestadius, Andre
    Penz, Markus
    Tellgren, Erik, I
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSICS-CONDENSED MATTER, 2021, 33 (29)
  • [3] INDEPENDENT VARIATION OF THE DENSITY AND THE POTENTIAL IN DENSITY-FUNCTIONAL METHODS
    METHFESSEL, M
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 1995, 52 (11): : 8074 - 8081
  • [4] STRUCTURES OF THE WATER HEXAMER USING DENSITY-FUNCTIONAL METHODS
    LEE, CT
    CHEN, H
    FITZGERALD, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1994, 101 (05): : 4472 - 4473
  • [5] Current and polarization in density-functional theory
    Resta, R
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1997, 213 : 317 - COMP
  • [6] Current densities in density-functional theory
    Lieb, Elliott H.
    Schrader, Robert
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2013, 88 (03):
  • [7] Density-functional methods in chemistry: An overview
    Laird, BB
    Ross, RB
    Ziegler, T
    [J]. CHEMICAL APPLICATIONS OF DENSITY-FUNCTIONAL THEORY, 1996, 629 : 1 - 17
  • [8] DENSITY-FUNCTIONAL APPROACH TO LCAO METHODS
    GARCIAVIDAL, FJ
    MERINO, J
    PEREZ, R
    RINCON, R
    ORTEGA, J
    FLORES, F
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 1994, 50 (15) : 10537 - 10547
  • [9] ELECTRON CORRELATION AND DENSITY-FUNCTIONAL METHODS
    COOK, M
    KARPLUS, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY, 1987, 91 (01): : 31 - 37
  • [10] Density-functional theory vs density-functional fits
    Becke, Axel D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 156 (21):