Place prioritization for biodiversity conservation using probabilistic surrogate distribution data

被引:40
|
作者
Sarkar, S [1 ]
Pappas, C [1 ]
Garson, J [1 ]
Aggarwal, A [1 ]
Cameron, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas, Sect Integrat Biol, Biodivers & Biocultural Conservat Lab, Austin, TX 78712 USA
关键词
area selection; conservation planning; integer programming; linear programming; probabilistic data analysis; reserve network selection; site selection;
D O I
10.1111/j.1366-9516.2004.00060.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
We analyse optimal and heuristic place prioritization algorithms for biodiversity conservation area network design which can use probabilistic data on the distribution of surrogates for biodiversity. We show how an Expected Surrogate Set Covering Problem (ESSCP) and a Maximal Expected Surrogate Covering Problem (MESCP) can be linearized for computationally efficient solution. For the ESSCP, we study the performance of two optimization software packages (XPRESS and CPLEX) and five heuristic algorithms based on traditional measures of complementarity and rarity as well as the Shannon and Simpson indices of alpha-diversity which are being used in this context for the first time. On small artificial data sets the optimal place prioritization algorithms often produced more economical solutions than the heuristic algorithms, though not always ones guaranteed to be optimal. However, with large data sets, the optimal algorithms often required long computation times and produced no better results than heuristic ones. Thus there is generally little reason to prefer optimal to heuristic algorithms with probabilistic data sets.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 133
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluating the performance of rarity as a surrogate in site prioritization for biodiversity conservation
    Astudillo-Scalia, Yaiyr
    de Albuquerque, Fabio Suzart
    [J]. GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2019, 18
  • [2] Accounting for multiple dimensions of biodiversity to assess surrogate performance in a freshwater conservation prioritization
    Brumm, Kyle J.
    Hanks, R. Daniel
    Baldwin, Robert F.
    Peoples, Brandon K.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2021, 122
  • [3] Place prioritization for biodiversity content
    Sarkar, S
    Aggarwal, A
    Garson, J
    Margules, CR
    Zeidler, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOSCIENCES, 2002, 27 (04) : 339 - 346
  • [4] Place prioritization for biodiversity content
    Sahotra Sarkar
    Anshu Aggarwal
    Justin Garson
    Chris R. Margules
    Juliane Zeidler
    [J]. Journal of Biosciences, 2002, 27 : 339 - 346
  • [5] Tradeoffs in the value of biodiversity feature and cost data in conservation prioritization
    Rodewald, Amanda D.
    Strimas-Mackey, Matt
    Schuster, Richard
    Arcese, Peter
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
  • [6] Tradeoffs in the value of biodiversity feature and cost data in conservation prioritization
    Amanda D. Rodewald
    Matt Strimas-Mackey
    Richard Schuster
    Peter Arcese
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 9
  • [7] Conservation prioritization using GAP data
    Kiester, AR
    Scott, JM
    Csuti, B
    Noss, RF
    Butterfield, B
    Sahr, K
    White, D
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 1996, 10 (05) : 1332 - 1342
  • [8] Conservation prioritization when species distribution data are scarce
    Politi, Natalia
    Rivera, Luis
    Martinuzzi, Sebastian
    Radeloff, Volker C.
    Pidgeon, Anna M.
    [J]. LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2021, 210
  • [9] Mapping winter waterbird biodiversity hotspots for conservation prioritization: Bridging gaps using citizen science data
    Chen, Wan-Jyun
    Chang, An -Yu
    Lin, Ruey-Shing
    Lee, Pei -Fen
    [J]. TAIWANIA, 2024, 69 (02)
  • [10] Spatial prioritization for biodiversity conservation in a megadiverse country
    Mendoza-Ponce, Alma V.
    Corona-Nunez, O.
    Kraxner, Florian
    Estrada, Francisco
    [J]. ANTHROPOCENE, 2020, 32