Determination of Benzophenones in Water and Cosmetics Samples: A Comparison of Solid-Phase Extraction and Microextraction by Packed Sorbent Methods

被引:11
|
作者
Wejnerowska, Grazyna [1 ]
Narloch, Izabela [1 ]
机构
[1] Bydgoszcz Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Food Anal & Environm Protect, Fac Chem Technol & Engn, 3 Seminaryjna St, PL-85326 Bydgoszcz, Poland
来源
MOLECULES | 2021年 / 26卷 / 22期
关键词
benzophenones; analysis of cosmetics; microextraction by packed sorbent; solid-phase extraction; water analysis; BAR SORPTIVE EXTRACTION; LIQUID-LIQUID MICROEXTRACTION; CHROMATOGRAPHY-MASS SPECTROMETRY; PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS; GAS-CHROMATOGRAPHY; UV FILTERS; ULTRAVIOLET FILTERS; RAPID-DETERMINATION; SUNSCREEN AGENTS; BATHING WATERS;
D O I
10.3390/molecules26226896
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Benzophenones (BPs) are extensively used in a wide variety of cosmetic products and other materials (e.g., textiles or plastics) to avoid damaging effects of UV radiation. In the present work, we compared two extraction methods for the determination of BPs, namely, 2,4-dihydroxybenzophenone (BP-1), 2-hydroxy-4-methoxybenzophenone (BP-3) and 2,2-dihydroxy-4-methoxybenzophenone (BP-8), in water and cosmetics samples. The following extraction methods were used for the research: solid-phase extraction (SPE) and microextraction by packed sorbent (MEPS), whereas analysis was performed by gas chromatography with mass spectrometric detection. A comparison between the methods indicates that the MEPS technique(s) can be reliably used for analysis of BPs (sunscreen residue) in water samples and cosmetic samples with satisfactory results. This microextraction technique is cheap, easy, quick to implement, and consumes small amounts of solvents. On the other hand, the main advantage of the SPE method are low detection limits for the determination of BPs in water samples, i.e., from 0.034 to 0.067 mu g L-1, while, for the MEPS method, LODs were at the level of 1.8-3.2 mu g L-1. For both methods, the recoveries of BPs were 96-107% and 44-70% for water and cosmetics samples, respectively. The presented methods are suitable for use in cosmetics quality control and environmental pollution assessment.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Determination of nitrate esters in water samples comparison of efficiency of solid-phase extraction and solid-phase microextraction
    Jezova, Vera
    Skladal, Jan
    Eisner, Ales
    Bajerova, Petra
    Ventura, Karel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2007, 1174 (1-2) : 13 - 19
  • [2] Comparison of Solid-Phase Extraction and Solid-Phase Microextraction Using Octadecylsilane Phase for the Determination of Pesticides in Water Samples
    Prieto, Avismelsi
    Araujo, Lilia
    Navalon, Alberto
    Vilchez, Jose L.
    [J]. CURRENT ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2009, 5 (03) : 219 - 224
  • [3] Development of solid-phase extraction and solid-phase microextraction methods for the determination of chlorophenols in cork macerate and wine samples
    Insa, S
    Salvadó, V
    Anticó, E
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2004, 1047 (01) : 15 - 20
  • [4] Development of a solid-phase microextraction method with micellar desorption for the determination of chlorophenols in water samples -: Comparison with conventional solid-phase microextraction method
    Mahugo Santana, C.
    Torres Padron, M. E.
    Sosa Ferrera, Z.
    Santana Rodriguez, J. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2007, 1140 (1-2) : 13 - 20
  • [5] Application of single-drop microextraction and comparison with solid-phase microextraction and solid-phase extraction for the determination of α- and β-endosulfan in water samples by gas chromatography-electron-capture detection
    López-Blanco, MC
    Blanco-Cid, S
    Cancho-Grande, B
    Simal-Gándara, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2003, 984 (02) : 245 - 252
  • [6] Ethanol/water extraction combined with solid-phase extraction and solid-phase microextraction concentration for the determination of chlorophenols in cork stoppers
    Insa, S
    Besalú, E
    Iglesias, C
    Salvadó, V
    Anticó, E
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2006, 54 (03) : 627 - 632
  • [7] Comparison of the performance of analytical methods based on solid-phase extraction and on solid-phase microextraction for the determination of antifouling booster biocides in natural waters
    I. K. Konstantinou
    D. G. Hela
    D. A. Lambropoulou
    V. A. Sakkas
    T. A. Albanis
    [J]. Chromatographia, 2002, 56 : 745 - 751
  • [8] Comparison of the performance of analytical methods based on solid-phase extraction and on solid-phase microextraction for the determination of antifouling booster biocides in natural waters
    Konstantinou, IK
    Hela, DG
    Lambropoulou, DA
    Sakkas, VA
    Albanis, TA
    [J]. CHROMATOGRAPHIA, 2002, 56 (11-12) : 745 - 751
  • [9] Application of biocharcoal aerogel sorbent for solid-phase microextraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in water samples
    Ji, Xiangping
    Feng, Juanjuan
    Li, Chunying
    Han, Sen
    Sun, Min
    Feng, Jiaqing
    Sun, Haili
    Fan, Jing
    Guo, Wenjuan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE, 2020, 43 (23) : 4364 - 4373
  • [10] Solid-phase microextraction for herbicide determination in environmental samples
    Krutz, LJ
    Senseman, SA
    Sciumbato, AS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2003, 999 (1-2) : 103 - 121