Regenerate Healing Outcomes in Unilateral Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis Using Quantitative Histomorphometry

被引:7
|
作者
Schwarz, Daniel A.
Arman, Krikor G.
Kakwan, Mehreen S.
Jamali, Ameen M.
Elmeligy, Ayman A.
Buchman, Steven R.
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Sch Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Toledo, Toledo, OH 43606 USA
[3] Ain Shams Univ, Cairo, Egypt
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
IN-VIVO EVIDENCE; CLINICAL-EXPERIENCE; BONE-FORMATION; HARD PALATE; OSTEOCYTES; MINERALIZATION; ADVANCEMENT; EXPRESSION; MIDFACE; OSTEODISTRACTION;
D O I
10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181e3b351
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The authors' goal was to ascertain regenerate bone-healing metrics using quantitative histomorphometry at a single consolidation period. Methods: Rats underwent either mandibular distraction osteogenesis (n = 7) or partially reduced fractures (n = 7); their contralateral mandibles were used as controls (n = 11). External fixators were secured and unilateral osteotomies performed, followed by either mandibular distraction osteogenesis (4 days' latency, then 0.3 mm every 12 hours for 8 days; 5.1 mm) or partially reduced fractures (fixed immediately postoperatively; 2.1 mm); both groups underwent 4 weeks of consolidation. After tissue processing, bone volume/tissue volume ratio, osteoid volume/tissue volume ratio, and osteocyte count per high-power field were analyzed by means of quantitative histomorphometry. Results: Contralateral mandibles had statistically greater bone volume/tissue volume ratio and osteocyte count per high-power field compared with both mandibular distraction osteogenesis and partially reduced fractures by almost 50 percent, whereas osteoid volume/tissue volume ratio was statistically greater in both mandibular distraction osteogenesis specimens and partially reduced fractures compared with contralateral mandibles. No statistical difference in bone volume/tissue volume ratio, osteoid volume/tissue volume ratio, or osteocyte count per high-power field was found between mandibular distraction osteogenesis specimens and partially reduced fractures. Conclusions: The authors' findings demonstrate significantly decreased bone quantity and maturity in mandibular distraction osteogenesis specimens and partially reduced fractures compared with contralateral mandibles using the clinically analogous protocols. If these results are extrapolated clinically, treatment strategies may require modification to ensure reliable, predictable, and improved outcomes. (Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 126: 795, 2010.)
引用
收藏
页码:795 / 805
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Unilateral mandibular widening with distraction osteogenesis
    Tea, KC
    Kang, KH
    Kim, SC
    [J]. ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2005, 75 (06) : 1053 - 1060
  • [2] Biomechanical Assessment of Regenerate Integrity in Irradiated Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis
    Schwarz, Daniel A.
    Jamali, Ameen M.
    Kakwan, Mehreen S.
    Fregene, Alero
    Arman, Krikor G.
    Buchman, Steven R.
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2009, 123 (02) : 114S - 122S
  • [3] Numerical simulation of unilateral mandibular distraction osteogenesis
    Li, Biao
    Wang, Qin-Meng
    Chen, Ying
    [J]. Yiyong Shengwu Lixue/Journal of Medical Biomechanics, 2011, 26 (03): : 274 - 278
  • [4] Sequential histomorphometric analysis of regenerate osteogenesis following mandibular distraction in the rat
    Williams, BE
    King, GJ
    Liu, ZJ
    Rafferty, KL
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF ORAL BIOLOGY, 2005, 50 (05) : 497 - 506
  • [5] Quantitative Histomorphometric Assessment of Regenerate Cellularity and Bone Quality in Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis After Radiation Therapy
    Inyang, Alero F.
    Schwarz, Daniel A.
    Jamali, Ameen M.
    Buchman, Steven R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2010, 21 (05) : 1438 - 1442
  • [6] Unilateral mandibular ramus elongation by intraoral distraction osteogenesis
    Kofod, T
    Norholt, SE
    Pedersen, TK
    Jensen, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2005, 16 (02) : 247 - 254
  • [7] Effect of nicotine on bone healing in mandibular distraction osteogenesis
    Zheng, LW
    Ma, L
    Cheung, LK
    [J]. BONE, 2006, 38 (03) : S21 - S22
  • [8] Mandibular remodeling: The fifth stage in distraction osteogenesis healing
    Guerrero, C
    Bell, W
    Gonzalez, M
    [J]. 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON CRANIAL AND FACIAL BONE DISTRACTION PROCESSES: 2001 DISTRACTION ODYSSEY, 2001, : 267 - 273
  • [9] Biomechanical characteristics of cortical bone regenerate after mandibular distraction osteogenesis in dogs
    Zapata, Uriel
    Kontogiorgos, Elias
    Elsalanty, Mohammed E.
    Dechow, Paul C.
    Opperman, Lynne A.
    [J]. FASEB JOURNAL, 2009, 23
  • [10] Experimental evaluation of acute molding of the regenerate in mandibular distraction osteogenesis in a rabbit model
    Candirli, Celal
    Dolanmaz, Dogan
    Etoz, Osman A.
    Avunduk, Mustafa Cihat
    [J]. ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY, 2010, 110 (05): : 554 - 559